IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnn/wpaper/24-022e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Transparency vs Privacy in Credit Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Makoto WATANABE
  • Yu Awaya
  • Hiroki Fukai

Abstract

We compare Transparency and Privacy in credit markets. A long-lived borrower, who has a risky investment opportunity, seeks loans from a sequence of short-lived lenders. Under Transparency, all the information about the past investment outcomes is shared among the future lenders, which helps the lenders learn the borrowers type. In contrast, no information is shared under Privacy. We first show that under both Transparency and Privacy, the iterated elimination of dominated strategies leaves unique outcomes. We then show that trade stops earlier under Transparency than under Privacy. A higher social welfare is achieved under Privacy than under Transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Makoto WATANABE & Yu Awaya & Hiroki Fukai, 2024. "Transparency vs Privacy in Credit Markets," CIGS Working Paper Series 24-022E, The Canon Institute for Global Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:24-022e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cigs.canon/en/uploads/2024/12/WP24-022E_m-watanabe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnn:wpaper:24-022e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Canon Institute for Global Studies (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/canonjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.