IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2018s-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structures tarifaires et spirale de la mort : État des lieux des pratiques de tarification dans la distribution d’électricité résidentielle

Author

Listed:
  • Timothé Beaufils
  • Pierre-Olivier Pineau

Abstract

Increasing penetration of decentralized energy resources (DER) is currently disrupting distribution grid’s monopoly. Basic tariff structures, mostly based on energy charges, are being outdated. Prosumers, a new class of residential ratepayers being both producers and consumers of electricity keep using the grid while their financial contribution is decreasing, causing tariff rises and inequities among users. This phenomenon, known under the term of “utility death spiral”, represents a major threat to utilities’ profitability. To tackle those new challenges, Distribution System Operators (DSOs) must improve their rate policies. In Europe, each utility is unbundled, allowing high flexibility in setting rates design. This results in a lot of different grid tariff structures applied, some of them being particularly daring. In North America, the situation is particularly unclear due to the heterogeneity of actor’s nature. Though, most utilities still seem to rely mostly on volumetric and fixed charges. Finally, this report aims to offer a global overview of the current challenges faced by grid utilities, and on how some DSOs are trying to move forward. By doing so, we hope that rate politics’ stakeholders will have a broader vision on the range of decent practices. Le développement des technologies décentralisées remet en question la place des réseaux dans le marché de l’électricité. Les structures tarifaires standards, principalement basées sur la quantité d’énergie consommée, ne sont désormais plus adaptées, et entraînent des risques de baisse de revenus pour les opérateurs de réseaux. Les consommacteurs, une nouvelle classe d’usagers qui investit dans les technologies de production et de stockage à domicile, continuent de bénéficier des avantages du réseau sans en payer une juste part. Ce phénomène, connu sous le nom de « spirale de la mort », est susceptible d’avoir des conséquences très néfastes sur la stabilité financière des opérateurs de réseau, et contrevient au principe d’équité censé guider la conception des structures tarifaires. Face à la nécessité de changer la composition du prix de l’électricité, on observe une grande hétérogénéité de pratiques autour du monde. Le marché européen, entièrement dégroupé entre producteurs, organismes de transmission, distributeurs et fournisseurs d’énergie, connait une grande variété de structures tarifaires, avec des prises de position très marquées en faveur de l’une ou l’autre des alternatives. En Amérique du Nord, si la diversité des statuts des opérateurs de distribution complique les comparaisons, l’introduction de nouveaux modes de tarification semble pour l’instant très marginale, et les tarifs volumétriques sont encore largement dominant. Finalement, ce rapport dresse un état des lieux succins des défis que doivent affronter les opérateurs de réseaux électriques, et propose un aperçu des réponses proposées autour du monde à ces divers enjeux. Il pourra apporter des points de repères sur les pratiques déjà en place, afin d’éclairer les acteurs impliqués dans la définition des politiques tarifaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothé Beaufils & Pierre-Olivier Pineau, 2018. "Structures tarifaires et spirale de la mort : État des lieux des pratiques de tarification dans la distribution d’électricité résidentielle," CIRANO Working Papers 2018s-27, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2018s-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2018s-27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veldhuis, Anton Johannes & Leach, Matthew & Yang, Aidong, 2018. "The impact of increased decentralised generation on the reliability of an existing electricity network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 479-502.
    2. Laws, Nicholas D. & Epps, Brenden P. & Peterson, Steven O. & Laser, Mark S. & Wanjiru, G. Kamau, 2017. "On the utility death spiral and the impact of utility rate structures on the adoption of residential solar photovoltaics and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 627-641.
    3. Langlois-Bertrand, Simon & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2018. "Pricing the transition: Empirical evidence on the evolution of electricity rate structures in North America," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 184-197.
    4. Castaneda, Monica & Franco, Carlos J. & Dyner, Isaac, 2017. "Evaluating the effect of technology transformation on the electricity utility industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 341-351.
    5. Brown, David P. & Sappington, David E.M., 2018. "On the role of maximum demand charges in the presence of distributed generation resources," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 237-249.
    6. Brown, Toby & Faruqui, Ahmad & Grausz, Léa, 2015. "Efficient tariff structures for distribution network services," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 139-149.
    7. Castaneda, Monica & Jimenez, Maritza & Zapata, Sebastian & Franco, Carlos J. & Dyner, Isaac, 2017. "Myths and facts of the utility death spiral," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 105-116.
    8. Clastres, Cédric, 2011. "Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5399-5408, September.
    9. Cédric Clastres, 2011. "Smart grids : Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives," Post-Print halshs-00617702, HAL.
    10. Picciariello, Angela & Vergara, Claudio & Reneses, Javier & Frías, Pablo & Söder, Lennart, 2015. "Electricity distribution tariffs and distributed generation: Quantifying cross-subsidies from consumers to prosumers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 23-33.
    11. Simshauser, Paul, 2016. "Distribution network prices and solar PV: Resolving rate instability and wealth transfers through demand tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 108-122.
    12. Nijhuis, M. & Gibescu, M. & Cobben, J.F.G., 2017. "Analysis of reflectivity & predictability of electricity network tariff structures for household consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 631-641.
    13. Schittekatte, Tim & Momber, Ilan & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "Future-proof tariff design: Recovering sunk grid costs in a world where consumers are pushing back," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 484-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beaufils, Timothé & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2019. "Assessing the impact of residential load profile changes on electricity distribution utility revenues under alternative rate structures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Vaughan, Jim & Doumen, Sjoerd C. & Kok, Koen, 2023. "Empowering tomorrow, controlling today: A multi-criteria assessment of distribution grid tariff designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    3. Javier Borquez & Hector Chavez & Karina A. Barbosa & Marcela Jamett & Rodrigo Acuna, 2020. "A Simple Distribution Energy Tariff under the Penetration of DG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Günther, Claudia & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2021. "Prosumage of solar electricity: Tariff design, capacity investments, and power sector effects," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 152.
    5. Morell-Dameto, Nicolás & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Gómez San Román, Tomás & Schittekatte, Tim, 2023. "Forward-looking dynamic network charges for real-world electricity systems: A Slovenian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Govaerts, Niels & Bruninx, Kenneth & Le Cadre, Hélène & Meeus, Leonardo & Delarue, Erik, 2019. "Spillover effects of distribution grid tariffs in the internal electricity market: An argument for harmonization?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Küfeoğlu, Sinan & Pollitt, Michael G., 2019. "The impact of PVs and EVs on domestic electricity network charges: A case study from Great Britain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 412-424.
    8. Cambini, Carlo & Soroush, Golnoush, 2019. "Designing grid tariffs in the presence of distributed generation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Clastres, Cédric & Percebois, Jacques & Rebenaque, Olivier & Solier, Boris, 2019. "Cross subsidies across electricity network users from renewable self-consumption," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2021. "Rate design with distributed energy resources and electric vehicles: A Californian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Bovera, Filippo & Delfanti, Maurizio & Fumagalli, Elena & Lo Schiavo, Luca & Vailati, Riccardo, 2021. "Regulating electricity distribution networks under technological and demand uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Avau, Michiel & Govaerts, Niels & Delarue, Erik, 2021. "Impact of distribution tariffs on prosumer demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Junhyung Kim & Keon Baek & Eunjung Lee & Jinho Kim, 2023. "Analysis of Net-Metering and Cross-Subsidy Effects in South Korea: Economic Impact across Residential Customer Groups by Electricity Consumption Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Passey, Robert & Haghdadi, Navid & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2017. "Designing more cost reflective electricity network tariffs with demand charges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 642-649.
    15. Spiller, Elisheba & Esparza, Ricardo & Mohlin, Kristina & Tapia-Ahumada, Karen & Ünel, Burçin, 2023. "The role of electricity tariff design in distributed energy resource deployment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Manuel de Villena, Miguel & Jacqmin, Julien & Fonteneau, Raphael & Gautier, Axel & Ernst, Damien, 2021. "Network tariffs and the integration of prosumers: The case of Wallonia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Hoarau, Quentin & Perez, Yannick, 2019. "Network tariff design with prosumers and electromobility: Who wins, who loses?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-39.
    18. Nicolás Morell Dameto & José Pablo Chaves-Ávila & Tomás Gómez San Román, 2020. "Revisiting Electricity Network Tariffs in a Context of Decarbonization, Digitalization, and Decentralization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Askeland, Magnus & Backe, Stian & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Korpås, Magnus, 2021. "Helping end-users help each other: Coordinating development and operation of distributed resources through local power markets and grid tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Bjarghov, Sigurd & Farahmand, Hossein & Doorman, Gerard, 2022. "Capacity subscription grid tariff efficiency and the impact of uncertainty on the subscribed level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2018s-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.