IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v117y2018icp184-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing the transition: Empirical evidence on the evolution of electricity rate structures in North America

Author

Listed:
  • Langlois-Bertrand, Simon
  • Pineau, Pierre-Olivier

Abstract

Over recent years, utilities supplying the residential electricity sector have struggled with a growing discrepancy between revenues and costs. The increasing share of fixed costs became difficult to recover through traditional rate structures, based on volumetric pricing. This trend is exacerbated by the increase in distributed and intermittent generation from renewable sources, and by changes in demand profiles. This study asks whether utilities across North America are adapting to these changes and taking advantage of dynamic pricing tools and demand response technologies, by taking stock of common tariffing practices to see if utilities do implement rates better tailored to support these transformations. We look at the U.S. Energy Information Administration's national survey, and then refine our analysis with 31 cases across North America. By looking at utilities’ current rate practices with regard to dynamic pricing, distributed generation, the integration of new technologies, demand response possibilities, as well as electric vehicle recharge, this exploration makes it clear that a large majority are not ready for these challenges and must innovate rapidly. Moreover, regulatory agencies must ensure that utilities do have the option of designing rates that move away from volume-based pricing and allow for the deployment of sophisticated demand response management.

Suggested Citation

  • Langlois-Bertrand, Simon & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2018. "Pricing the transition: Empirical evidence on the evolution of electricity rate structures in North America," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 184-197.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:184-197
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421518301356
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fares, Robert L. & King, Carey W., 2017. "Trends in transmission, distribution, and administration costs for U.S. investor-owned electric utilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 354-362.
    2. Michael G. Pollitt, 2016. "Electricity Network Charging for Flexibility," Working Papers EPRG 1623, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521477185 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Chonghui & Bai, Chen & Su, Weihua & Balezentis, Tomas, 2024. "The centralised data envelopment analysis model integrated with cost information and utility theory for power price setting under carbon peak strategy at the firm-level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Öhrlund, Isak & Schultzberg, Mårten & Bartusch, Cajsa, 2019. "Identifying and estimating the effects of a mandatory billing demand charge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 885-895.
    3. Javier Borquez & Hector Chavez & Karina A. Barbosa & Marcela Jamett & Rodrigo Acuna, 2020. "A Simple Distribution Energy Tariff under the Penetration of DG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Beaufils, Timothé & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2019. "Assessing the impact of residential load profile changes on electricity distribution utility revenues under alternative rate structures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Timothé Beaufils & Pierre-Olivier Pineau, 2018. "Structures tarifaires et spirale de la mort : État des lieux des pratiques de tarification dans la distribution d’électricité résidentielle," CIRANO Working Papers 2018s-27, CIRANO.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    2. Gorman, Will & Mills, Andrew & Wiser, Ryan, 2019. "Improving estimates of transmission capital costs for utility-scale wind and solar projects to inform renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Faerber, Laura Antonia & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Connor, Peter M., 2018. "Innovative network pricing to support the transition to a smart grid in a low-carbon economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 210-219.
    4. Crampes, Claude & Renault, Jérôme, 2019. "How many markets for wholesale electricity when supply ispartially flexible?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 465-478.
    5. Rahdan, Parisa & Zeyen, Elisabeth & Gallego-Castillo, Cristobal & Victoria, Marta, 2024. "Distributed photovoltaics provides key benefits for a highly renewable European energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    6. Saleh Abushamah, Hussein Abdulkareem & Skoda, Radek, 2022. "Nuclear energy for district cooling systems – Novel approach and its eco-environmental assessment method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Simeone, Christina E. & Gagnon, Pieter & Cappers, Peter & Satchwell, Andrew, 2023. "The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Palmer, Graham, 2017. "An input-output based net-energy assessment of an electricity supply industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1504-1516.
    9. Ken Furusawa & Gert Brunekreeft & Toru Hattori, 2019. "Constrained Connection for Distributed Generation by DSOs in European Countries," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0028, Bremen Energy Research.
    10. Beaufils, Timothé & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2019. "Assessing the impact of residential load profile changes on electricity distribution utility revenues under alternative rate structures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Küfeoğlu, Sinan & Pollitt, Michael G., 2019. "The impact of PVs and EVs on domestic electricity network charges: A case study from Great Britain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 412-424.
    12. Wang, Yifei & He, Rui & Tian, Zhigang, 2023. "Opportunistic condition-based maintenance optimization for electrical distribution systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Rauschkolb, Noah & Limandibhratha, Nathalie & Modi, Vijay & Mercadal, Ignacia, 2021. "Estimating electricity distribution costs using historical data," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Gorman, Will & Jarvis, Stephen & Callaway, Duncan, 2020. "Should I Stay Or Should I Go? The importance of electricity rate design for household defection from the power grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    15. Schittekatte, Tim & Momber, Ilan & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "Future-proof tariff design: Recovering sunk grid costs in a world where consumers are pushing back," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 484-498.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:184-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.