IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2002s-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Multi-Group Investigation of the CES-D's Measurement Structure Across Adolescents, Young Adults and Middle-Aged Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Blais
  • Ursula Hess
  • Andrea S. Riddle

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to investigate, via multi-group analyses, the dimensional structure of the CES-D (Radloff, 1977) across three age groups. For this, three studies were conducted on cross-sectional samples of French speaking respondents, varying in age and drawn from the Quebec educational system: 599 adolescent high school students, 291 young adults attending university, and 844 middle-aged adult employees of a school board. Five a priori hypothesized models were tested via structural equation modeling: a single-factor, two three-factors, a four-factor and a second-order factor model. The four-factor and the second-order factor model provided the best fit and the latter model remained largely invariant across the groups when tested via multi-group comparisons. Other psychometric characteristics of the French Canadian version of the scale (e.g., test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent-discriminant validity) were also shown to be satisfactory. Possible applications of subcomponent scores in research (based on the multidimensional structure of the scale), rather than the commonly used composite CES-D score, are discussed. Le but de cette recherche était d'évaluer, à l'aide d'analyses multi-groupes, la structure factorielle de notre version française du CES-D (Radloff, 1977) parmi trois groupes d'âge. Trois études transversales ont été réalisées auprès d'échantillons francophones du Québec provenant du système d'éducation : 599 élèves du secondaire, 291 étudiants à l'Université et 844 employés d'une commission scolaire. Cinq modèles a priori ont été évalués à l'aide d'analyses de modélisation par équations structurales : un modèle unidimensionnel, deux modèles à trois dimensions, un modèle à quatre facteurs et un modèle hiérarchique. Les deux derniers modèles se sont avérés les meilleurs. Les analyses multi-groupes révèlent que le modèle hiérarchique était le plus invariant parmi les différents groupes d'âges. D'autres caractéristiques psychométriques de cette version canadienne française du CES-D, au niveau de la fiabilité temporelle, de la consistance interne et de la validité convergente-discriminante, se sont avérées satisfaisantes. Les implications concernant l'utilisation des scores des dimensions plutôt que du score total de l'ensemble de la mesure sont discutées.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Blais & Ursula Hess & Andrea S. Riddle, 2002. "A Multi-Group Investigation of the CES-D's Measurement Structure Across Adolescents, Young Adults and Middle-Aged Adults," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-36, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2002s-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2002s-36.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.
    2. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    3. Guarnaccia, Peter J. & Angel, Ronald & Worobey, Jacqueline Lowe, 1989. "The factor structure of the CES-D in the Hispanic health and nutrition examination survey: The influences of ethnicity, gender and language," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 85-94, January.
    4. Iwata, Noboru & Roberts, Robert E., 1996. "Age differences among Japanese on the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: An ethnocultural perspective on somatization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 967-974, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Blais & Ursula Hess & Andrea S. Riddle, 2002. "Static Versus Dynamic Structural Models of Depression: The Case of the CES-D," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-37, CIRANO.
    2. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    3. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Preferences for Driver Traveler Information Using Wireless Internet-enabled Devices," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt40q8h6sf, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Naiara Escalante Mateos & Eider Goñi Palacios & Arantza Fernández-Zabala & Iratxe Antonio-Agirre, 2020. "Internal Structure, Reliability and Invariance across Gender Using the Multidimensional School Climate Scale PACE-33," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Jung, Hyekyung & Schafer, Joseph L. & Seo, Byungtae, 2011. "A latent class selection model for nonignorably missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 802-812, January.
    7. repec:jss:jstsof:06:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lin Ting Hsiang, 2006. "A comparison of model selection indices for nested latent class models," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 239-259, October.
    9. Wedel, Michel & Böckenholt, Ulf & Kamakura, Wagner A., 2003. "Factor models for multivariate count data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 356-369, November.
    10. Pendharkar, Parag C., 2006. "Scale economies and production function estimation for object-oriented software component and source code documentation size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 1040-1050, August.
    11. Koufteros, Xenophon & Lu, Guanyi & Peters, Richard C. & Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2014. "Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 83-97.
    12. Yang, Chih-Chien, 2006. "Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 1090-1104, February.
    13. Ando, Tomohiro, 2009. "Bayesian factor analysis with fat-tailed factors and its exact marginal likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(8), pages 1717-1726, September.
    14. GONZALO, Jesus & PITARAKIS, Jean-Yves, 1994. "Comovements in Large Systems," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1994065, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    15. Qi Yuan & Tee Hng Tan & Peizhi Wang & Fiona Devi & Hui Lin Ong & Edimansyah Abdin & Magadi Harish & Richard Goveas & Li Ling Ng & Siow Ann Chong & Mythily Subramaniam, 2020. "Staging dementia based on caregiver reported patient symptoms: Implications from a latent class analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Tuan, Luu Trong & Ngan, Vu Thanh, 2021. "Leading ethically to shape service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior among tourism salespersons: Dual mediation paths and moderating role of service role identity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    17. Qi Chen & Wen Luo & Gregory J. Palardy & Ryan Glaman & Amber McEnturff, 2017. "The Efficacy of Common Fit Indices for Enumerating Classes in Growth Mixture Models When Nested Data Structure Is Ignored," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440177, March.
    18. Roy Levy & Gregory R. Hancock, 2011. "An Extended Model Comparison Framework for Covariance and Mean Structure Models, Accommodating Multiple Groups and Latent Mixtures," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(2), pages 256-278, May.
    19. Munzel, Andreas & Meyer-Waarden, Lars & Galan, Jean-Philippe, 2018. "The social side of sustainability: Well-being as a driver and an outcome of social relationships and interactions on social networking sites," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 14-27.
    20. Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández & Iker Izar-de-la-Fuente & Naiara Escalante & Lorea Azpiazu, 2021. "Perceived Social Support for a Sustainable Adolescence: A Theoretical Model of Its Sources and Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    21. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gw166zk, University of California Transportation Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2002s-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.