IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt347789n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

California Housing Trends: Implications for Transportation Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Shirgaokar, Manish
  • Deakin, Elizabeth

Abstract

A broad range of population forecasts and historic trends indicate that significant growth is on the horizon for California. Although population growth by geographic regions, racial/ethic groups, and age will vary, growth is a consistent trend. Naturally, growth in population implies growth in households and demand for housing units. It is imperative that any evaluation of regional growth trends to aid transportation infrastructure planning must look at housing patterns to grasp the complete picture.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirgaokar, Manish & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2001. "California Housing Trends: Implications for Transportation Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt347789n8, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt347789n8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/347789n8.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cervero, Robert & Menotti, Val, 1994. "Market Profiles of Rail-Based Housing Projects in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt89k664kz, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Steiner, Ruth L., 1998. "Traditional Shopping Centers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5c82t0dh, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Kirshner, Edward & Bigelow, Jennifer & Codina, Rick & Conover, Nancy, 1992. "California'S Lower-Income Housing Cooperatives," Research Reports 140052, University of California, Davis, Center for Cooperatives.
    4. Salomon, Ilan & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 1997. "Why Don't You Telecommute?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0z47k3jj, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Cervero, Robert, 1994. "Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 174-183, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deakin, Elizabeth & Thomas, John & Ferrell, Christopher & Wei, Kai & Shirgaokar, Manish & Kim, Songju & Mason, Jonathan & Scott, Lilia & Sood, Vikrant, 2001. "Twelve Trends for Consideration in California's Transportation Plan," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt29r3w4r6, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Deakin, Elizabeth & Thomas, John & Ferrell, Christopher & Wei, Kai & Shirgaokar, Manish & Kim, Songju & Mason, Jonathan & Scott, Lilia & Sood, Vikrant, 2001. "Overview and Summary: Twelve Trends for Consideration in California's Transportation Plan," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7v74f6bq, University of California Transportation Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirgaokar, Manish & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2001. "California Housing Trends: Implications for Transportation Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5q87h87h, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Cervero, Robert, 1996. "Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 361-377, September.
    3. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0d84c2f4, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Cynthia Chen & Hongmian Gong & Robert Paaswell, 2008. "Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 285-299, May.
    5. Bo Wan & Xudan Zhao & Yuhan Sun & Tao Yang, 2023. "Unraveling the Impact of Spatial Configuration on TOD Function Mix Use and Spatial Intensity: An Analysis of 47 Morning Top-Flow Stations in Beijing (2018–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Qing Su, 2017. "Travel Demand Management Policy Instruments, Urban Spatial Characteristics, and Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Travel in the US Urban Areas," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 157-166.
    7. Cervero, Robert & Guerra, Erick, 2011. "Urban Densities and Transit: A Multi-dimensional Perspective," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3mb598qr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Guang Tian & Reid Ewing & Rachel Weinberger & Kevin Shively & Preston Stinger & Shima Hamidi, 2017. "Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: a case study of Redmond TOD, Seattle region," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1235-1254, September.
    9. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Rodriguez, Daniel A., 2018. "The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-184.
    10. Gurmu, Shiferaw & Ihlanfeldt, Keith R. & Smith, William J., 2008. "Does residential location matter to the employment of TANF recipients Evidence from a dynamic discrete choice model with unobserved effects," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 325-351, January.
    11. Jyothi Chava & Peter Newman, 2016. "Stakeholder Deliberation on Developing Affordable Housing Strategies: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Transit-Oriented Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A., 2003. "Carsharing and Carfree Housing: Predicted Travel, Emission, and Economic Benefits: A Case Study of the Sacramento, California Region," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8549598k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2008. "Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt72p9n6qt, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Houshmand E. MASOUMI, 2014. "A Theoretical Approach To Capabilities Of The Traditional Urban Form In Promoting Sustainable Transportation," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 44-60, February.
    15. Peng, Ya-Ting & Li, Zhi-Chun & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 269-290.
    16. Beukes, E.A. & Vanderschuren, M.J.W.A. & Zuidgeest, M.H.P., 2011. "Context sensitive multimodal road planning: a case study in Cape Town, South Africa," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 452-460.
    17. Qing Shen, 2000. "New Telecommunications and Residential Location Flexibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1445-1463, August.
    18. Chakrabarti, Sandip, 2017. "How can public transit get people out of their cars? An analysis of transit mode choice for commute trips in Los Angeles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 80-89.
    19. Santoso, Djoen San & Yajima, Masaru & Sakamoto, Kunihiro & Kubota, Hisashi, 2012. "Opportunities and strategies for increasing bus ridership in rural Japan: A case study of Hidaka City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 320-329.
    20. Rodier, Caroline J, 2000. "Uncertainty in Travel and Emissions Models: A Case Study in the Sacramento Region," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7cg7f9dd, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt347789n8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.