IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i10p1024-d80431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Deliberation on Developing Affordable Housing Strategies: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Transit-Oriented Developments

Author

Listed:
  • Jyothi Chava

    (Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Peter Newman

    (Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

Abstract

Transit-oriented developments (TODs) are commanding high land and rental values due to improved accessibility and economic opportunities. Owing to the increase in land and rental values, the highly desirable TODs are gradually becoming inaccessible to the poor, creating social exclusion and housing inequities within the TODs. To address this consequence, the study proposes a three-level stakeholder deliberation framework (inform, involve, and collaborate) towards developing inclusive housing strategies for equitable and sustainable TODs. The framework is applied to the context of the Yeshwanthpur industrial area, Bengaluru, India. The first level of deliberation, ‘information’, foregrounds the need for affordable housing strategies for stakeholders. In the second level of deliberation, the stakeholders involved identify the major challenges in incorporating affordable housing into TODs. In the third level of deliberation, stakeholders collaborate to contemplate strategies to combat each challenge. The results show that mandatory inclusionary zoning, special-purpose planning vehicles, land banking entities, innovative financing tools, and local area level plans in collaboration with the community, emerged as potentially feasible strategies to create inclusive housing outcomes in the TOD case study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyothi Chava & Peter Newman, 2016. "Stakeholder Deliberation on Developing Affordable Housing Strategies: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Transit-Oriented Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:1024-:d:80431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/10/1024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/10/1024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cervero, Robert & Day, Jennifer, 2008. "Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 315-323, September.
    2. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0d84c2f4, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. P. Topalovic & J. Carter & M. Topalovic & G. Krantzberg, 2012. "Light Rail Transit in Hamilton: Health, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 329-350, September.
    4. Satya Sai Kumar Jillella & Annie Matan & Peter Newman, 2015. "Participatory Sustainability Approach to Value Capture-Based Urban Rail Financing in India through Deliberated Stakeholder Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jd6r1t9, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Robert Cervero, 2010. "Transit Transformations: Private Financing and Sustainable Urbanism in Hong Kong and Tokyo," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: William Ascher & Corinne Krupp (ed.), Physical Infrastructure Development: Balancing the Growth, Equity, and Environmental Imperatives, chapter 0, pages 165-185, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt68r764df, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Cervero, Robert & Chapple, Karen & Landis, John & Wachs, Martin & Duncan, Michael & Scholl, Patricia Lynn & Blumenberg, Evelyn, 2006. "MAKING DO: How Working Families in Seven U.S. Metropolitan Areas Trade Off Housing Costs and Commuting Times," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9wf8x6p5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Machell, Erin & Reinhalter, Troy & Chapple, Karen, 2009. "Building Support for Transit-Oriented Development: Do Community-Engagement Toolkits Work?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt48q1v30c, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Robert Cervero & Jin Murakami, 2009. "Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2019-2043, September.
    11. Chase Billingham & Barry Bluestone & Stephanie Pollack, 2010. "Maintaining diversity in America's transit-rich neighborhoods: tools for equitable neighborhood change," New England Community Developments, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pages 1-6.
    12. Lin, Jeffrey, 2002. "Gentrification and Transit in Northwest Chicago," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 41(4).
    13. Cervero, Robert, 1994. "Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 174-183, June.
    14. Peter Newman, 2014. "Density, the Sustainability Multiplier: Some Myths and Truths with Application to Perth, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Annelise Grube-Cavers & Zachary Patterson, 2015. "Urban rapid rail transit and gentrification in Canadian urban centres: A survival analysis approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(1), pages 178-194, January.
    16. Mu, Rui & Jong, Martin de, 2012. "Establishing the conditions for effective transit-oriented development in China: the case of Dalian," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 234-249.
    17. Yan, Sisi & Delmelle, Eric & Duncan, Michael, 2012. "The impact of a new light rail system on single-family property values in Charlotte, North Carolina," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(2), pages 60-67.
    18. Matthew E. Kahn, 2007. "Gentrification Trends in New Transit-Oriented Communities: Evidence from 14 Cities That Expanded and Built Rail Transit Systems," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 35(2), pages 155-182, June.
    19. Robert Cervero & Hiroaki Suzuki & Kanako Iuchi, 2013. "Transforming Cities with Transit : Transit and Land-Use Integration for Sustainable Urban Development [Transformando las ciudades con el transporte público : integración del transporte público y el," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shadi O. Tehrani & Shuling J. Wu & Jennifer D. Roberts, 2019. "The Color of Health: Residential Segregation, Light Rail Transit Developments, and Gentrification in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Abdi, Mohammad Hamed, 2021. "What the newcomers to transit-oriented development are confronted with? Evidence from Iranian policy and planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Sharma, Rohit & Newman, Peter, 2018. "Can land value capture make PPP's competitive in fares? A Mumbai case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 123-131.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cervero, Robert & Guerra, Erick, 2011. "Urban Densities and Transit: A Multi-dimensional Perspective," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3mb598qr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Dong, Hongwei, 2017. "Rail-transit-induced gentrification and the affordability paradox of TOD," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Heilmann, Kilian, 2018. "Transit access and neighborhood segregation. Evidence from the Dallas light rail system," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 237-250.
    4. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Teller, David, 2020. "Study design impacts on built environment and transit use research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Lin, Jen-Jia & Yang, Shu-Han, 2019. "Proximity to metro stations and commercial gentrification," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 79-89.
    6. Singh, Yamini Jain & Lukman, Azhari & Flacke, Johannes & Zuidgeest, Mark & Van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M., 2017. "Measuring TOD around transit nodes - Towards TOD policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 96-111.
    7. Wang, Jinshuo & Samsura, D. Ary A. & van der Krabben, Erwin, 2019. "Institutional barriers to financing transit-oriented development in China: Analyzing informal land value capture strategies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Nilsson, Isabelle & Delmelle, Elizabeth, 2018. "Transit investments and neighborhood change: On the likelihood of change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 167-179.
    9. Vale, David S. & Viana, Cláudia M. & Pereira, Mauro, 2018. "The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 282-293.
    10. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Rodriguez, Daniel A., 2018. "The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-184.
    11. Dohyung Kim & Yongjin Ahn & Simon Choi & Kwangkoo Kim, 2016. "Sustainable Mobility: Longitudinal Analysis of Built Environment on Transit Ridership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Pavkova, Katerina, 2016. "Does transit mode influence the transit-orientation of urban development? – An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 83-91.
    13. Jinbao Zhao & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Yueran Zhu, 2014. "Analysis of Metro ridership at station level and station-to-station level in Nanjing: an approach based on direct demand models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 133-155, January.
    14. Wang, Yiming & Feng, Suwei & Deng, Zhongwei & Cheng, Shuangyu, 2016. "Transit premium and rent segmentation: A spatial quantile hedonic analysis of Shanghai Metro," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 61-69.
    15. Li, Zekun & Han, Zixuan & Xin, Jing & Luo, Xin & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min, 2019. "Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 269-282.
    16. Zhao, Pengjun & Yang, Hanzi & Kong, Lu & Liu, Yunshu & Liu, Di, 2018. "Disintegration of metro and land development in transition China: A dynamic analysis in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 290-307.
    17. Lyu, Guowei & Bertolini, Luca & Pfeffer, Karin, 2016. "Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 40-50.
    18. Mishra, Sabyasachee & Welch, Timothy F. & Jha, Manoj K., 2012. "Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1066-1085.
    19. Jenny Schuetz & Genevieve Giuliano & Eun Jin Shin, 2018. "Does zoning help or hinder transit-oriented (re)development?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1672-1689, June.
    20. Rui Mu & Martin De Jong, 2018. "A Tale of Two Chinese Transit Metropolises and the Implementation of Their Policies: Shenyang and Dalian (Liaoning Province, China)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:1024-:d:80431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.