IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v44y2017i5d10.1007_s11116-016-9702-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: a case study of Redmond TOD, Seattle region

Author

Listed:
  • Guang Tian

    (University of Utah)

  • Reid Ewing

    (University of Utah)

  • Rachel Weinberger

    (Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates)

  • Kevin Shively

    (Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates)

  • Preston Stinger

    (Fehr & Peers Associates)

  • Shima Hamidi

    (University of Texas)

Abstract

The decision on how best to allocate land around transit stations is a debated topic, with transit officials often opting for park-and-ride lots over active uses such as multifamily housing, office, and retail organized into transit-oriented developments (TODs). In this study, we identify the ten best self-contained TODs in ten regions across United States based on seven criteria: dense, mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly, adjacent to transit, built after transit, fully developed, and with self-contained parking. We measure trip and parking generation at one of these TODs, the Redmond TOD in the Seattle region, as a pilot study, using an onsite count and intercept survey. The results show that the Redmond TOD has 1.7 times more trips made by walking and 3 times more trips made by transit than Seattle’s regional average. The actual vehicle trips we observed are only 37 % of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) expected value. The actual residential peak period parking demand is only 65 % of the ITE’s peak demand, and the actual commercial peak period parking demand is only 27 % of the ITE’s peak demand. Additionally, the peak period of transit parking was daytime, while the peak periods of commercial and residential were evening and nighttime. There is a real opportunity for sharing parking spaces among these different uses, something which is not realized at present.

Suggested Citation

  • Guang Tian & Reid Ewing & Rachel Weinberger & Kevin Shively & Preston Stinger & Shima Hamidi, 2017. "Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: a case study of Redmond TOD, Seattle region," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1235-1254, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:44:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-016-9702-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-016-9702-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-016-9702-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-016-9702-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Zhan, 2013. "Does residential parking supply affect household car ownership? The case of New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 18-28.
    2. Weinberger, Rachel, 2012. "Death by a thousand curb-cuts: Evidence on the effect of minimum parking requirements on the choice to drive," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 93-102.
    3. Shoup, Donald C, 2003. "Truth in Transportation Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt999346pn, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Cervero, Robert, 1994. "Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 174-183, June.
    5. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1997. "Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system: Land use and development impacts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 309-333, July.
    6. Daniel G. Chatman, 2013. "Does TOD Need the T?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 17-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phani Kumar, P. & Ravi Sekhar, Ch. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2018. "Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 166-177.
    2. Qi Chen & Yibo Yan & Xu Zhang & Jian Chen, 2022. "Impact of Subjective and Objective Factors on Subway Travel Behavior: Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Rao, Fujie & Pafka, Elek, 2021. "Shopping morphologies of urban transit station areas: A comparative study of central city station catchments in Toronto, San Francisco, and Melbourne," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Ibraeva, Anna & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Silva, Cecília & Antunes, António Pais, 2020. "Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 110-130.
    5. Xinyu Zhuang & Li Zhang & Jie Lu, 2022. "Past—Present—Future: Urban Spatial Succession and Transition of Rail Transit Station Zones in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-35, October.
    6. Moyano, Amparo & Solís, Eloy & Díaz-Burgos, Elena & Rodrigo, Alejandro & Coronado, José M., 2023. "Typologies of stations’ catchment areas in metropolitan urban peripheries: From car-oriented to sustainable urban strategies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Blanco, Hilda & Wikstrom, Alexander, 2018. "Transit-Oriented Development Opportunities Among Failing Malls," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3h62q04h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Tao Zhang & Yibo Yan & Qi Chen & Ze Liu, 2022. "Evaluation Method of Composite Development Bus Terminal Using Multi-Source Data Processing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. De Gruyter, Chris & Zahraee, Seyed Mojib & Shiwakoti, Nirajan, 2021. "Site characteristics associated with multi-modal trip generation rates at residential developments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 127-145.
    10. Xianchun Tan & Tangqi Tu & Baihe Gu & Yuan Zeng & Tianhang Huang & Qianqian Zhang, 2021. "Assessing CO 2 Emissions from Passenger Transport with the Mixed-Use Development Model in Shenzhen International Low-Carbon City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Woojung Kim & Xiaokun (Cara) Wang, 2022. "Double parking in New York city: a comparison between commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1315-1337, October.
    12. Xiang Tang & Jianxiao Ma & Peng He & Chubo Xu, 2022. "Parking Allocation Index Analysis of Office Building Based on the TOD Measurement Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Chao Zeng & Xu Zhou & Li Yu & Changxi Ma, 2023. "Parking Generating Rate Prediction Method Based on Grey Correlation Analysis and SSA-GRNN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scheiner, Joachim & Faust, Nico & Helmer, Johannes & Straub, Michael & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2020. "What's that garage for? Private parking and on-street parking in a high-density urban residential neighbourhood," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Albalate, Daniel & Gragera, Albert, 2020. "The impact of curbside parking regulations on car ownership," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Zhu, Yi & Diao, Mi, 2016. "The impacts of urban mass rapid transit lines on the density and mobility of high-income households: A case study of Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 70-80.
    4. Ying Huang & Yongli Zhang & Feifan Deng & Daiqing Zhao & Rong Wu, 2022. "Impacts of Built-Environment on Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Traffic: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0d84c2f4, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Qian Liu & James Wang & Peng Chen & Zuopeng Xiao, 2017. "How does parking interplay with the built environment and affect automobile commuting in high-density cities? A case study in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3299-3317, November.
    7. Gabbe, C.J. & Pierce, Gregory & Clowers, Gordon, 2020. "Parking policy: The effects of residential minimum parking requirements in Seattle," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Rodriguez, Daniel A., 2018. "The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-184.
    9. Budnitz, Hannah & Meelen, Toon & Schwanen, Tim, 2022. "Residential Neighbourhood Charging of Electric Vehicles: an exploration of user preferences," SocArXiv fsv7n, Center for Open Science.
    10. Evan Iacobucci, 2024. "“Would it be weird to live here without a car?”: Using social media to understand car ownership decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 475-500, April.
    11. Chen, Quanquan & Conway, Alison & Cheng, Jialei, 2017. "Parking for residential delivery in New York City: Regulations and behavior," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-60.
    12. Jukka Heinonen & Michał Czepkiewicz & Áróra Árnadóttir & Juudit Ottelin, 2021. "Drivers of Car Ownership in a Car-Oriented City: A Mixed-Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    13. Şafak Hengirmen Tercan, 2023. "Effect of Residential Parking Policy Derogations on Sustainability of Streets: The Case of Gaziantep, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Zhong, Haotian & Li, Wei, 2016. "Rail transit investment and property values: An old tale retold," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 33-48.
    15. Chakrabarti, Sandip, 2017. "How can public transit get people out of their cars? An analysis of transit mode choice for commute trips in Los Angeles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 80-89.
    16. Michael Wegener & Franz Fuerst, 2004. "Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art," Urban/Regional 0409005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Blanco, Hilda & Wikstrom, Alexander, 2018. "Transit-Oriented Development Opportunities Among Failing Malls," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3h62q04h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    18. Lin, Jen-Jia & Yang, Shu-Han, 2019. "Proximity to metro stations and commercial gentrification," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 79-89.
    19. Selzer, Sina, 2021. "Car-reduced neighborhoods as blueprints for the transition toward an environmentally friendly urban transport system? A comparison of narratives and mobility-related practices in two case studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. De Gruyter, Chris & Davies, Liam & Truong, Long T., 2021. "Examining spatial variations in minimum residential parking requirements in Melbourne," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:44:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-016-9702-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.