IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt7p3386qz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of the Anaheim Advanced Traffic Control System Field Operational Test: Introduction and Task A: Evaluation of SCOOT Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, James E. II
  • Jayakrishnan, R.
  • McNally, M. G.
  • MacCarley, C. Arthur

Abstract

This report provides an overview of the federally-sponsored Anaheim Advanced Traffic Control System Field Operations Test, and of the technical issues associated with the evaluation of SCOOT performance during this test. The primary FOT objective was the implementation and performance evaluation of adaptive traffic signal control technologies including an existing second generation approach, SCOOT, and a 1.5 generation control (1.5GC) approach under development. Also selected for implementation was a video traffic detection system (VTDS). The SCOOT evaluation was defined relative to existing, first generation UTCS-based control but using standard field detectorization rather than that normally associated with SCOOT. Furthermore, SCOOT was installed to operate in parallel to UTCS. The 1.5GC system was planned to be efficiently utilized to update baseline timing plans. The VTDS was planned for use as a low cost system detector for deployment in critical areas. Both SCOOT and the VTDS were implemented with some degree of success, with technical and institutional issues limiting expected performance. Technical issues that limited SCOOT performance included existing communication and controller systems of lower quality than anticipated. Corresponding institutional factors included inconsistent project management due to staff changes and delays due to contractual issues. Both SCOOT and a modified version of the VTDS are in current use in selected areas, with plans for system expansion. This evaluation report summarizes an introduction to the project, the evaluation objectives for Tasks A and B, and Task A of the three part evaluation project. Separate reports summarize Tasks B and C, assessment of institutional issues and the advanced Video Detection Systems, respectively

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, James E. II & Jayakrishnan, R. & McNally, M. G. & MacCarley, C. Arthur, 1999. "Evaluation of the Anaheim Advanced Traffic Control System Field Operational Test: Introduction and Task A: Evaluation of SCOOT Performance," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7p3386qz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt7p3386qz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7p3386qz.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Herman & Siamak Ardekani, 1985. "The Influence of Stops on Vehicle Fuel Consumption in Urban Traffic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Siamak Ardekani & Robert Herman, 1987. "Urban Network-Wide Traffic Variables and Their Relations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. MacCarley, Art, 1998. "City Of Anaheim / Caltrans / F H W A Advanced Traffic Control System Field Operational Test Evaluation: Task C Video Traffic Detection System," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4vm4188z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth Small, 2015. "The Bottleneck Model: An Assessment and Interpretation," Working Papers 141506, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    2. Arnott, Richard, 2013. "A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 110-121.
    3. Kenneth A. Small & Xuehao Chu, 2003. "Hypercongestion," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 37(3), pages 319-352, September.
    4. Wada, Kentaro & Satsukawa, Koki & Smith, Mike & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2019. "Network throughput under dynamic user equilibrium: Queue spillback, paradox and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-413.
    5. Jin, Wen-Long & Gan, Qi-Jian & Gayah, Vikash V., 2013. "A kinematic wave approach to traffic statics and dynamics in a double-ring network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 114-131.
    6. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Sun, Jie, 2011. "Hysteresis phenomena of a Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram in freeway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 966-979, November.
    7. Bou Sleiman, Lea, 2023. "Displacing Congestion: Evidence from Paris," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2302, CEPREMAP.
    8. Laval, Jorge A. & Aghamohammadi, Rafegh, 2022. "Network-wide Emissions Estimation Using the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8670m9jh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2011. "On the macroscopic stability of freeway traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 782-788, June.
    10. Alonso, Borja & Ibeas, Ángel & Musolino, Giuseppe & Rindone, Corrado & Vitetta, Antonino, 2019. "Effects of traffic control regulation on Network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram: A statistical analysis of real data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 136-151.
    11. Gayah, Vikash V. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2010. "Clockwise Hysteresis Loops in the MacroscopicFundamental Diagram," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2x98k1x2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Small, Kenneth A., 2015. "The bottleneck model: An assessment and interpretation," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 110-117.
    13. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2008. "An analytical approximation for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 771-781, November.
    14. Williams, James C. & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Herman, Robert, 1995. "Sampling strategies for two-fluid model parameter estimation in urban networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 229-244, May.
    15. Ranjan, Abhishek & Fosgerau, Mogens & Jenelius, Erik, 2016. "Emergence of a urban traffic macroscopic fundamental diagram," MPRA Paper 74350, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Oct 2016.
    16. Gonzales, Eric J., 2015. "Coordinated pricing for cars and transit in cities with hypercongestion," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 64-81.
    17. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    18. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2010. "On the Stability of Freeway Traffic," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4vf597r5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    19. Cheng, Qixiu & Lin, Yuqian & Zhou, Xuesong (Simon) & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2024. "Analytical formulation for explaining the variations in traffic states: A fundamental diagram modeling perspective with stochastic parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 182-197.
    20. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Sun, Jie, 2011. "Properties of a well-defined macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 605-617, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt7p3386qz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.