IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt65s0d62v.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance Comparison of Crane Double CyclingStrategies

Author

Listed:
  • Goodchild, Anne V.
  • Daganzo, Carlos

Abstract

This report compares the performance of three double-cycling algorithms used to determine the sequence with which to load and unload containers from a vessel with a quay crane. Double cycling is a technique which can improve the efficiency of a quay crane and container port by unloading and loading containers in the same crane cycle. The three algorithms, the greedy strategy, the proximal strategy, and Johnson’s rule, are introduced and results from applying the three strategies to a set of simulated vessels are compared. While Johnson’s rule provides the minimum number of cycles required to unload and load a vessel using double cycling, it is operationally less convenient. The proximal strategy is operationally convenient, but provides a smaller benefit when compared to single cycling. All strategies provide significant benefit (about a 40% reduction over single cycling for hatchless ships), and the results are not particularly sensitive to the algorithm used.

Suggested Citation

  • Goodchild, Anne V. & Daganzo, Carlos, 2005. "Performance Comparison of Crane Double CyclingStrategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt65s0d62v, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt65s0d62v
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/65s0d62v.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodchild, Anne V. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2005. "Crane Double Cycling in Container Ports: Affect on Ship Dwell Time," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9qp7p7jq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. S. M. Johnson, 1954. "Optimal two‐ and three‐stage production schedules with setup times included," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 61-68, March.
    3. Goodchild, Anne Victoria, 2005. "Crane Double Cycling in Container Ports: Algorithms, Evaluation, and Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0nt8t1db, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanling Chu & Xiaoju Zhang & Zhongzhen Yang, 2017. "Multiple quay cranes scheduling for double cycling in container terminals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Dusan Ku & Tiru S. Arthanari, 2016. "On double cycling for container port productivity improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 55-70, August.
    3. Liu, Ming & Chu, Feng & Zhang, Zizhen & Chu, Chengbin, 2015. "A polynomial-time heuristic for the quay crane double-cycling problem with internal-reshuffling operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 52-74.
    4. Anne V. Goodchild & Carlos F. Daganzo, 2006. "Double-Cycling Strategies for Container Ships and Their Effect on Ship Loading and Unloading Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 473-483, November.
    5. Raja Awais Liaqait & Shermeen Hamid & Salman Sagheer Warsi & Azfar Khalid, 2021. "A Critical Analysis of Job Shop Scheduling in Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Wlodzimierz Szwarc & Jatinder N. D. Gupta, 1987. "A flow‐shop problem with sequence‐dependent additive setup times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 619-627, October.
    7. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu & Shisheng Li, 2016. "New results on two-machine flow-shop scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1493-1504, May.
    8. Bock, Felix & Bruhn, Henning, 2021. "Case study on scheduling cyclic conveyor belts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Yuan Yuan & Yan Lan & Ning Ding & Xin Han, 2022. "A PTAS for non-resumable open shop scheduling with an availability constraint," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 350-362, March.
    10. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    11. Dar-Li Yang & Wen-Hung Kuo, 2019. "Minimizing Makespan in A Two-Machine Flowshop Problem with Processing Time Linearly Dependent on Job Waiting Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Lee, Kangbok & Zheng, Feifeng & Pinedo, Michael L., 2019. "Online scheduling of ordered flow shops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 50-60.
    13. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2021. "Minmax due-date assignment on a two-machine flowshop," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 191-209, October.
    14. S. S. Panwalkar & Christos Koulamas, 2019. "The evolution of schematic representations of flow shop scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 379-391, August.
    15. Vincent T’kindt & Federico Della Croce & Mathieu Liedloff, 2022. "Moderate exponential-time algorithms for scheduling problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 533-566, December.
    16. Said Aqil & Karam Allali, 2021. "On a bi-criteria flow shop scheduling problem under constraints of blocking and sequence dependent setup time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 615-637, January.
    17. Jan Gmys, 2022. "Exactly Solving Hard Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problems on Peta-Scale GPU-Accelerated Supercomputers," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2502-2522, September.
    18. José Alves & Francisco Baptista & José Carlos Coelho, 2024. "The impact of labor share on economic growth: a panel data analysis for European Union," Working Papers REM 2024/0319, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    19. Fernando Luis Rossi & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2022. "Beam search-based heuristics for the mixed no-idle flowshop with total flowtime criterion," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1311-1346, December.
    20. Hosseini, Amir & Otto, Alena & Pesch, Erwin, 2024. "Scheduling in manufacturing with transportation: Classification and solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 821-843.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt65s0d62v. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.