IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bei/00bewp/0028.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Constrained Connection for Distributed Generation by DSOs in European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Furusawa
  • Gert Brunekreeft
  • Toru Hattori

Abstract

A high penetration of renewable energy sources (RES) connected to the distribution network due to Feed-in-Tariff (FIT) brought many challenges for DSOs. With the responsibility to connect, DSOs may be required to make investment in the network. In order to connect distributed generation (DG) while deferring the investment, European DSOs use “constrained connection” by which DG is connected conditional on the curtailment. Different approaches for constrained connection in Europe exist and case studies of the different approaches in Germany, France, and UK show that the relative acceptability of DG and ease of curtailment by DSOs are different, depending on the energy policy background and technology available in each country.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Furusawa & Gert Brunekreeft & Toru Hattori, 2019. "Constrained Connection for Distributed Generation by DSOs in European Countries," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0028, Bremen Energy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:bei:00bewp:0028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bremen-energy-research.de/wp-content/bewp/bewp28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Brandstätt & Gert Brunekreeft & Ken Furusawa & Toru Hattori, 2015. "Distribution Planning and Pricing in View of Increasing Shares of Intermittent, Renewable Energy in Germany and Japan," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0020, Bremen Energy Research.
    2. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2014. "Experience with smarter commercial arrangements for distributed wind generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 52-62.
    3. Brandstätt, Christine & Brunekreeft, Gert & Jahnke, Katy, 2011. "How to deal with negative power price spikes?--Flexible voluntary curtailment agreements for large-scale integration of wind," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3732-3740, June.
    4. Michael G. Pollitt, 2016. "Electricity Network Charging for Flexibility," Working Papers EPRG 1623, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Yong Soon & Park, Gye Hyun & Kim, Seung Wan & Kim, Dam, 2024. "Incentive design for hybrid energy storage system investment to PV owners considering value of grid services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    2. Martin Palovic, 2022. "Making market-based redispatch efficient: How to alter distribution effects without distorting the generation dispatch?," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0041, Bremen Energy Research.
    3. Shi, Wangying & Zhu, Jianzhong & Han, Minfang & Sun, Zaihong & Guo, Yaming, 2019. "Operating limitation and degradation modeling of micro solid oxide fuel cell-combined heat and power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morales-España, Germán & Nycander, Elis & Sijm, Jos, 2021. "Reducing CO2 emissions by curtailing renewables: Examples from optimal power system operation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2015. "Integrating distributed generation: Regulation and trends in three leading countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 475-486.
    3. Palovic, Martin, 2022. "Administrative congestion management meets electricity network regulation: Aligning incentives between the renewable generators and network operator," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Zhang, J. & Meng, M. & Wang, David, Z.W., 2019. "A dynamic pricing scheme with negative prices in dockless bike sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 201-224.
    5. Michael G. Pollitt and Karim L. Anaya, 2016. "Can current electricity markets cope with high shares of renewables? A comparison of approaches in Germany, the UK and the State of New York," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Bollino-M).
    6. Andor, Mark & Voss, Achim, 2016. "Optimal renewable-energy promotion: Capacity subsidies vs. generation subsidies," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 144-158.
    7. Auer, Benjamin R., 2016. "How does Germany's green energy policy affect electricity market volatility? An application of conditional autoregressive range models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 621-628.
    8. Ahmad, Ali & Saqib, Muhammad Asghar & Rahman Kashif, Syed Abdul & Javed, Muhammad Yaqoob & Hameed, Abdul & Khan, Muhammad Usman, 2016. "Impact of wide-spread use of uninterruptible power supplies on Pakistan's power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 629-636.
    9. Kyritsis, Evangelos & Andersson, Jonas & Serletis, Apostolos, 2017. "Electricity prices, large-scale renewable integration, and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 550-560.
    10. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Measuring a Paradox: Zero-negative Electricity Prices," Working Papers 13-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    11. Davi-Arderius, D. & Jamasb, T., 2024. "Measuring a Paradox: Zero-Negative Electricity Prices," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2451, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Hadush, Samson Yemane & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "DSO-TSO cooperation issues and solutions for distribution grid congestion management," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 610-621.
    13. Marco Badami & Gabriele Fambri & Salvatore Mancò & Mariapia Martino & Ioannis G. Damousis & Dimitrios Agtzidis & Dimitrios Tzovaras, 2019. "A Decision Support System Tool to Manage the Flexibility in Renewable Energy-Based Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    15. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2015. "Options for allocating and releasing distribution system capacity: Deciding between interruptible connections and firm DG connections," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 96-105.
    16. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2014. "The Role of Distribution Network Operators in Promoting Cost-Effective Distributed Generation: Lessons from the United States for Europe," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1448, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Faerber, Laura Antonia & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Connor, Peter M., 2018. "Innovative network pricing to support the transition to a smart grid in a low-carbon economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 210-219.
    18. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Früh, Wolf-Gerrit & Flynn, David, 2017. "Game-theoretic modeling of curtailment rules and network investments with distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 174-187.
    19. Langlois-Bertrand, Simon & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2018. "Pricing the transition: Empirical evidence on the evolution of electricity rate structures in North America," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 184-197.
    20. Brijs, Tom & De Vos, Kristof & De Jonghe, Cedric & Belmans, Ronnie, 2015. "Statistical analysis of negative prices in European balancing markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 53-60.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    electric utilities; regulation;

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bei:00bewp:0028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Pechan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bremen-energy-research.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.