IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aua/wpaper/2015-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dealing with farm heterogeneity on modeling agricultural policy: An Agent Based Modeling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitris Kremmydas

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens)

  • Stelios Rozakis

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens)

  • Ioannis N. Athanasiadis

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. of Democritus University of Thrace, in Xanthi, Greece)

Abstract

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has been gradually transformed from directly supporting prices and production to a decoupled scheme, where farmers receive a payment per hectare regardless of their production decisions. Within this framework and given the multitude of CAP's objectives, ranging from market competiveness to multifunctionality of agriculture, the inclusion of the heterogeneity of farms on modeling CAP will continuously arise in the immediate future as a key research question. In this paper we make a brief discussion of the aspects of farm heterogeneity within the agricultural policy modeling context and we show that Agent Based Modeling approach, coupled with Object Oriented System Analysis, is a very good alternative for considering all aspects of diversity of farms. Finally we present Agroscape, a flexible ABM Agricultural Policy Framework that can easily incorporates both behavioral and capacity heterogeneity presenting a proof-of-concept case study

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitris Kremmydas & Stelios Rozakis & Ioannis N. Athanasiadis, 2015. "Dealing with farm heterogeneity on modeling agricultural policy: An Agent Based Modeling Approach," Working Papers 2015-3, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:aua:wpaper:2015-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aoatools.aua.gr/RePEc/aua/wpaper/files/2015-3.Kremmydas.Agroscape.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavlos Karanikolas & Stelios Rozakis & Dimitris Kremmydas, 2013. "The multiplicity of goals in tree-cultivating farms in Greece," Working Papers 2013-2, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Assuncao, Juliano J. & Ghatak, Maitreesh, 2003. "Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 189-194, August.
    3. D. Kremmydas & A. Petsakos & S. Rozakis, 2012. "Parametric Optimization of Linear and Non-Linear Models via Parallel Computing to Enhance Web-Spatial DSS Interactivity," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 4(1), pages 14-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliano Junqueira Assunção, 2005. "Non-agricultural land use and land reform: theory and evidence from Brazil," Textos para discussão 496, Department of Economics PUC-Rio (Brazil).
    2. Aragón, Fernando M. & Restuccia, Diego & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Are small farms really more productive than large farms?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. James Roumasset, 2010. "Wither the Economics of Agricultural Development?," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Klaus Deininger & Songqing Jin & Yanyan Liu & Sudhir K. Singh, 2018. "Can Labor-Market Imperfections Explain Changes in the Inverse Farm Size–Productivity Relationship? Longitudinal Evidence from Rural India," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 94(2), pages 239-258.
    5. Juan Wu & Wenjing Yu & Xiaobing Liu & Yali Wen, 2022. "Analysis of Influencing Factors and Income Effect of Heterogeneous Agricultural Households’ Forestland Transfer," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Kolawole Adewuyi Adekunle & Michael Amurtiya, 2021. "Economic analysis of rice production by small-holder women farmers in Adamawa State, Nigeria," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Sant'anna, André Albuquerque, 2017. "Land inequality and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Getu Hailu & Alfons Weersink & Bart Minten, 2017. "Determinants of the Productivity of Teff in Ethiopia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(4), pages 866-892, August.
    9. Rada, Nicholas & Wang, Chenggang & Qin, Lijian, 2015. "Subsidy or market reform? Rethinking China’s farm consolidation strategy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 93-103.
    10. Yao, Ling & Chen, Qihui & Wu, Laping, 2018. "Heterogeneous supply response: Does high price expectation attenuate the inverse farm size-productivity relationship in China?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274363, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Dilek Uz & Steven Buck & David Sunding, 2022. "Fixed or mixed? Farmer‐level heterogeneity in response to changes in salinity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1343-1363, August.
    12. Kilic, Talip & Zezza, Alberto & Carletto, Calogero & Savastano, Sara, 2017. "Missing(ness) in Action: Selectivity Bias in GPS-Based Land Area Measurements," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 143-157.
    13. Gautam, Madhur & Ahmed, Mansur, 2019. "Too small to be beautiful? The farm size and productivity relationship in Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 165-175.
    14. Carletto, Calogero & Savastano, Sara & Zezza, Alberto, 2013. "Fact or artifact: The impact of measurement errors on the farm size–productivity relationship," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 254-261.
    15. DJOKOTO, Justice G. & BADU-PRAH, Charlotte & GIDIGLO, Ferguson K. & SROFENYOH, Francis Y. & AGYEI-HENAKU, Kofi Aaron A-O. & AFRANE ARTHUR, Akua A., 2022. "Farm Size And Efficiency Nexus: Evidence From A Meta-Regression," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 25(1), March.
    16. Jozefine Nybom & Erik Hunter & Eric Micheels & Martin Melin, 2021. "Farmers’ strategic responses to competitive intensity and the impact on perceived performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Ji Yong Lee & Allen Featherstone & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Doo Bong Han, 2019. "The Long-Run and Short-Run Effects of Ethanol Production on U.S. Beef Producers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Marijn Verschelde & Marijke D’Haese & Glenn Rayp & Ellen Vandamme, 2013. "Challenging Small-Scale Farming: A Non-Parametric Analysis of the (Inverse) Relationship Between Farm Productivity and Farm Size in Burundi," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 319-342, June.
    19. Reddy, A. Amarender, 2015. "Regional Disparities in Profitability of Rice Production: Where Small Farmers Stand?," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 70(3), pages 1-13.
    20. Sarthak Gaurav & Srijit Mishra, 2011. "Size-class and returns to cultivation in India: A Cold case reopened," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2011-027, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Policy; Agent Based Modeling; Object Oriented System analysis; Farm heterogeneity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aua:wpaper:2015-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kremmydas dimitrios (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daauagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.