IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2502.07518.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrating the implied regularity into implied volatility models: A study on free arbitrage model

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Angelini
  • Fabrizio Di Sciorio

Abstract

Implied volatility IV is a key metric in financial markets, reflecting market expectations of future price fluctuations. Research has explored IV's relationship with moneyness, focusing on its connection to the implied Hurst exponent H. Our study reveals that H approaches 1/2 when moneyness equals 1, marking a critical point in market efficiency expectations. We developed an IV model that integrates H to capture these dynamics more effectively. This model considers the interaction between H and the underlying-to-strike price ratio S/K, crucial for capturing IV variations based on moneyness. Using Optuna optimization across multiple indexes, the model outperformed SABR and fSABR in accuracy. This approach provides a more detailed representation of market expectations and IV-H dynamics, improving options pricing and volatility forecasting while enhancing theoretical and pratcical financial analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Angelini & Fabrizio Di Sciorio, 2025. "Integrating the implied regularity into implied volatility models: A study on free arbitrage model," Papers 2502.07518, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.07518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.07518
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Bianchi & A. Pantanella & A. Pianese, 2013. "Modeling stock prices by multifractional Brownian motion: an improved estimation of the pointwise regularity," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(8), pages 1317-1330, July.
    2. Poterba, James M & Summers, Lawrence H, 1986. "The Persistence of Volatility and Stock Market Fluctuations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1142-1151, December.
    3. Nicola F. Zaugg & Leonardo Perotti & Lech A. Grzelak, 2024. "Volatility Parametrizations with Random Coefficients: Analytic Flexibility for Implied Volatility Surfaces," Papers 2411.04041, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    4. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:4:p:1011-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Biao Guo & Qian Han & Bin Zhao, 2014. "The Nelson–Siegel Model of the Term Structure of Option Implied Volatility and Volatility Components," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(8), pages 788-806, August.
    6. Chalamandaris, Georgios & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E., 2010. "Predictable dynamics in implied volatility surfaces from OTC currency options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1175-1188, June.
    7. Angelini, Daniele & Bianchi, Sergio, 2023. "Nonlinear biases in the roughness of a Fractional Stochastic Regularity Model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Bo Yuan & Damiano Brigo & Antoine Jacquier & Nicola Pede, 2024. "Deep learning interpretability for rough volatility," Papers 2411.19317, arXiv.org.
    9. Jiro Akahori & Xiaoming Song & Tai-Ho Wang, 2022. "Probability Density of Lognormal Fractional SABR Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, August.
    10. See-Woo Kim & Jeong-Hoon Kim, 2020. "Volatility and variance swaps and options in the fractional SABR model," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(17), pages 1725-1745, November.
    11. Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Mehdi Tomas, 2021. "Deep learning volatility: a deep neural network perspective on pricing and calibration in (rough) volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 11-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biao Guo & Qian Han & Hai Lin, 2018. "Are there gains from using information over the surface of implied volatilities?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(6), pages 645-672, June.
    2. Kearney, Fearghal & Shang, Han Lin & Sheenan, Lisa, 2019. "Implied volatility surface predictability: The case of commodity markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. James T. Moser, 1992. "Determining margin for futures contracts: the role of private interests and the relevance of excess volatility," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 16(Mar), pages 2-18.
    4. Dimitrios D. Thomakos & Michail S. Koubouros, 2011. "The Role of Realised Volatility in the Athens Stock Exchange," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 15(1-2), pages 87-124, March - J.
    5. Cornelis A. Los, 2004. "Nonparametric Efficiency Testing of Asian Stock Markets Using Weekly Data," Finance 0409033, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. John M. Maheu & Thomas H. McCurdy, 2002. "Nonlinear Features of Realized FX Volatility," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(4), pages 668-681, November.
    7. Bujar Huskaj & Marcus Nossman, 2013. "A Term Structure Model for VIX Futures," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 421-442, May.
    8. Taufiq Choudhry & Ranadeva Jayasekera, 2015. "Level of efficiency in the UK equity market: empirical study of the effects of the global financial crisis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 213-242, February.
    9. Tanha, Hassan & Dempsey, Michael, 2016. "The evolving dynamics of the Australian SPI 200 implied volatility surface," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 44-57.
    10. Patrick Büchel & Michael Kratochwil & Maximilian Nagl & Daniel Rösch, 2022. "Deep calibration of financial models: turning theory into practice," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 109-136, July.
    11. Dimitrios D. Thomakos & Michail S. Koubouros, 2005. "Realized Volatility and Asymmetries in the A.S.E. Returns," Finance 0504009, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Jan 2006.
    12. Chalamandaris, Georgios & Rompolis, Leonidas S., 2012. "Exploring the role of the realized return distribution in the formation of the implied volatility smile," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1028-1044.
    13. Ezzat, Hassan, 2012. "The Application of GARCH and EGARCH in Modeling the Volatility of Daily Stock Returns During Massive Shocks: The Empirical Case of Egypt," MPRA Paper 50530, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Strauss, Jack & Yigit, Taner, 2001. "Present value model, heteroscedasticity and parameter stability tests," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 375-378, December.
    15. Bollerslev, Tim & Kretschmer, Uta & Pigorsch, Christian & Tauchen, George, 2009. "A discrete-time model for daily S & P500 returns and realized variations: Jumps and leverage effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 151-166, June.
    16. Li, Qi & Yang, Jian & Hsiao, Cheng & Chang, Young-Jae, 2005. "The relationship between stock returns and volatility in international stock markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 650-665, December.
    17. Baosheng Yuan & Kan Chen, 2005. "Impact of Investor's Varying Risk Aversion on the Dynamics of Asset Price Fluctuations," Papers physics/0506224, arXiv.org.
    18. Ghysels, E. & Harvey, A. & Renault, E., 1995. "Stochastic Volatility," Papers 95.400, Toulouse - GREMAQ.
    19. David M. Frankel, 2008. "Adaptive Expectations And Stock Market Crashes," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(2), pages 595-619, May.
    20. Ole E. Barndorff‐Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2002. "Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 253-280, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.07518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.