IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2501.03919.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-Hypothesis Prediction for Portfolio Optimization: A Structured Ensemble Learning Approach to Risk Diversification

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez
  • Muhammad Shahzad
  • Xia Hong

Abstract

A framework for portfolio allocation based on multiple hypotheses prediction using structured ensemble models is presented. Portfolio optimization is formulated as an ensemble learning problem, where each predictor focuses on a specific asset or hypothesis. The portfolio weights are determined by optimizing the ensemble's parameters, using an equal-weighted portfolio as the target, serving as a canonical basis for the hypotheses. Diversity in learning among predictors is parametrically controlled, and their predictions form a structured input for the ensemble optimization model. The proposed methodology establishes a link between this source of learning diversity and portfolio risk diversification, enabling parametric control of portfolio diversification prior to the decision-making process. Moreover, the methodology demonstrates that the diversity in asset or hypothesis selection, based on predictions of future returns, before and independently of the ensemble learning stage, also contributes to the out-of-sample portfolio diversification. The sets of assets with more diverse but lower average return predictions are preferred over less diverse selections. The methodology enables parametric control of diversity in both the asset selection and learning stages, providing users with significant control over out-of-sample portfolio diversification prior to decision-making. Experiments validate the hypotheses across one-step and multi-step decisions for all parameter configurations and the structured model variants using equity portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez & Muhammad Shahzad & Xia Hong, 2025. "Multi-Hypothesis Prediction for Portfolio Optimization: A Structured Ensemble Learning Approach to Risk Diversification," Papers 2501.03919, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.03919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.03919
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lassance, Nathan & Martín-Utrera, Alberto & Simaan, Majeed, 2023. "The Risk of Expected Utility under Parameter Uncertainty," LIDAM Reprints LFIN 2023011, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    2. Stefano Giglio & Bryan Kelly & Dacheng Xiu, 2022. "Factor Models, Machine Learning, and Asset Pricing," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 337-368, November.
    3. Doron Avramov & Guofu Zhou, 2010. "Bayesian Portfolio Analysis," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 25-47, December.
    4. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    5. Adam N. Elmachtoub & Paul Grigas, 2022. "Smart “Predict, then Optimize”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 9-26, January.
    6. Maaz Mahadi & Tarig Ballal & Muhammad Moinuddin & Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri & Ubaid Al-Saggaf, 2022. "Portfolio Optimization Using a Consistent Vector-Based MSE Estimation Approach," Papers 2204.05611, arXiv.org.
    7. Kan, Raymond & Zhou, Guofu, 2007. "Optimal Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 621-656, September.
    8. Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiang Li & Sini Guo, 2018. "Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz’s mean–variance framework: a review of literature," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-158, June.
    9. Lasse Heje Pedersen & Abhilash Babu & Ari Levine, 2021. "Enhanced Portfolio Optimization," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 124-151, April.
    10. Cai, Zhaokun & Cui, Zhenyu & Lassance, Nathan & Simaan, Majeed, 2024. "The Economic Value of Mean Squared Error: Evidence from Portfolio Selection," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2024003, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Peñaranda & Enrique Sentana, 2024. "Portfolio management with big data," Working Papers wp2024_2411, CEMFI.
    2. David Bauder & Taras Bodnar & Nestor Parolya & Wolfgang Schmid, 2021. "Bayesian mean–variance analysis: optimal portfolio selection under parameter uncertainty," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 221-242, February.
    3. Johannes Bock, 2018. "An updated review of (sub-)optimal diversification models," Papers 1811.08255, arXiv.org.
    4. Bodnar, Taras & Mazur, Stepan & Okhrin, Yarema, 2017. "Bayesian estimation of the global minimum variance portfolio," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 292-307.
    5. Matthias M. M. Buehlmaier & Kit Pong Wong, 2020. "Should investors join the index revolution? Evidence from around the world," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 192-218, May.
    6. Fassino, Claudia & Torrente, Maria-Laura & Uberti, Pierpaolo, 2022. "A singular value decomposition based approach to handle ill-conditioning in optimization problems with applications to portfolio theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    7. Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiang Li & Sini Guo, 2018. "Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz’s mean–variance framework: a review of literature," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-158, June.
    8. Carmine De Franco & Johann Nicolle & Huyên Pham, 2019. "Dealing with Drift Uncertainty: A Bayesian Learning Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    10. Füss, Roland & Miebs, Felix & Trübenbach, Fabian, 2014. "A jackknife-type estimator for portfolio revision," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-28.
    11. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Voigt, Stefan, 2019. "Large-scale portfolio allocation under transaction costs and model uncertainty," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 221-240.
    12. Thomas J. Brennan & Andrew W. Lo, 2010. "Impossible Frontiers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 905-923, June.
    13. Jonathan Fletcher, 2009. "Risk Reduction and Mean‐Variance Analysis: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7‐8), pages 951-971, September.
    14. Thomas Trier Bjerring & Omri Ross & Alex Weissensteiner, 2017. "Feature selection for portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 21-40, September.
    15. Yan, Lei & Garcia, Philip, 2017. "Portfolio investment: Are commodities useful?," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 43-55.
    16. Rubesam, Alexandre, 2022. "Machine learning portfolios with equal risk contributions: Evidence from the Brazilian market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PB).
    17. Lassance, Nathan & Vanderveken, Rodolphe & Vrins, Frédéric, 2022. "On the optimal combination of naive and mean-variance portfolio strategies," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2022006, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    18. Hongseon Kim & Soonbong Lee & Seung Bum Soh & Seongmoon Kim, 2022. "Improving portfolio investment performance with distance‐based portfolio‐combining algorithms," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 941-959, December.
    19. Katrin Schöttle & Ralf Werner & Rudi Zagst, 2010. "Comparison and robustification of Bayes and Black-Litterman models," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(3), pages 453-475, June.
    20. Han, Chulwoo, 2020. "A nonparametric approach to portfolio shrinkage," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.03919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.