IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.05516.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Consumer Sensitivity to Audio Advertising: A Long-Run Field Experiment on Pandora Internet Radio

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Goli
  • Jason Huang
  • David Reiley
  • Nickolai M. Riabov

Abstract

A randomized experiment with almost 35 million Pandora listeners enables us to measure the sensitivity of consumers to advertising, an important topic of study in the era of ad-supported digital content provision. The experiment randomized listeners into nine treatment groups, each of which received a different level of audio advertising interrupting their music listening, with the highest treatment group receiving more than twice as many ads as the lowest treatment group. By maintaining consistent treatment assignment for 21 months, we measure long-run demand effects and find ad-load sensitivity three times greater than what we would have obtained from a month-long experiment. We show the negative impact on the number of hours listened, days listened, and probability of listening at all in the final month. Using an experimental design that separately varies the number of commercial interruptions per hour and the number of ads per commercial interruption, we find that listeners primarily respond to the total number of ads per hour, with a slight preference for more frequent but shorter ad breaks. Lastly, we find that increased ad load led to an increase in the number of paid ad-free subscriptions to Pandora. Importantly, we show that observational methods often lead to biased or even directionally incorrect estimates of these effects, highlighting the value of experimental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Goli & Jason Huang & David Reiley & Nickolai M. Riabov, 2024. "Measuring Consumer Sensitivity to Audio Advertising: A Long-Run Field Experiment on Pandora Internet Radio," Papers 2412.05516, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.05516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.05516
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.05516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.