Scalable Estimation of Multinomial Response Models with Random Consideration Sets
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Crawford, Gregory S. & Griffith, Rachel & Iaria, Alessandro, 2021. "A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 4-43.
- Chiang, Jeongwen & Chib, Siddhartha & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 1998. "Markov chain Monte Carlo and models of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 223-248, November.
- Jason Abaluck & Abi Adams-Prassl, 2021. "What do Consumers Consider Before They Choose? Identification from Asymmetric Demand Responses," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(3), pages 1611-1663.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Roy Allen, 2024. "Exogenous Consideration and Extended Random Utility," Papers 2405.13945, arXiv.org.
- Victor Aguirregabiria & Alessandro Iaria & Senay Sokullu, 2023.
"Identification and Estimation of Demand Models with Endogenous Product Entry and Exit,"
Papers
2308.14196, arXiv.org.
- Victor Aguirregabiria & Alessandro Iaria & Senay Sokullu, 2023. "Identification and Estimation of Demand Models with Endogenous Product Entry and Exit," Working Papers tecipa-755, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
- Aguirregabiria, Victor & Iaria, Alessandro & Sokullu, Senay, 2023. "Identification and Estimation of Demand Models with Endogenous Product Entry and Exit," CEPR Discussion Papers 18398, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Nail Kashaev & Natalia Lazzati & Ruli Xiao, 2023. "Peer Effects in Consideration and Preferences," Papers 2310.12272, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
- Takeshi Fukasawa, 2022. "The Biases in Applying Static Demand Models under Dynamic Demand," Discussion Paper Series DP2022-18, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Jul 2022.
- Greg Lewis & Bora Ozaltun & Georgios Zervas, 2021. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Differentiated Products Demand Systems," Papers 2111.12397, arXiv.org.
- Kovach, Matthew & Suleymanov, Elchin, 2023.
"Reference dependence and random attention,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 421-441.
- Matthew Kovach & Elchin Suleymanov, 2021. "Reference Dependence and Random Attention," Papers 2106.13350, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
- Christina Gravert, 2024. "From Intent to Inertia: Experimental Evidence from the Retail Electricity Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 11139, CESifo.
- Kashaev, Nail & Aguiar, Victor H., 2022.
"A random attention and utility model,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
- Nail Kashaev & Victor H. Aguiar, 2021. "A Random Attention and Utility Model," Papers 2105.11268, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
- Nail Kashaev & Victor H. Aguiar, 2022. "A Random Attention and Utility Model," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20223, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
- Crawford, Gregory S. & Griffith, Rachel & Iaria, Alessandro, 2021. "A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 4-43.
- Tamara Bischof & Michael Gerfin & Tobias Mueller, 2021. "Attention Please! Health Plan Choice and (In-)Attention," Diskussionsschriften dp2111, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
- Vardit Landsman & Moshe Givon, 2010. "The diffusion of a new service: Combining service consideration and brand choice," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 91-121, March.
- C. Angelo Guevara, 2022. "A Note on "A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity" by Gregory S. Crawford, Rachel Griffith, and Alessandro Iaria," Papers 2205.00852, arXiv.org.
- Helmers, Christian & Krishnan, Pramila & Patnam, Manasa, 2019.
"Attention and saliency on the internet: Evidence from an online recommendation system,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 216-242.
- Christian Helmers & Pramila Krishnan & Manasa Patnam, 2015. "Attention and Saliency on the Internet: Evidence from an Online Recommendation System," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1563, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Krishnan, Pramila & Helmers, Christian & Patnam, Manasa, 2015. "Attention and Saliency on the Internet: Evidence from an Online Recommendation System," CEPR Discussion Papers 10939, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Christian Helmers & Pramila Krishnan & Manasa Patnam, 2015. "Attention and Saliency on the Internet: Evidence from an online recommendation system," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1532, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Ben Aoki-Sherwood & Catherine Bregou & David Liben-Nowell & Kiran Tomlinson & Thomas Zeng, 2024. "Bounding Consideration Probabilities in Consider-Then-Choose Ranking Models," Papers 2401.11016, arXiv.org.
- Michel, Christian & Stenzel, André, 2021.
"Model-based evaluation of cooling-off policies,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 270-293.
- Christian Michel & André Stenzel, 2018. "Model-Based Evaluation of Cooling-off Policies," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_061v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Christian Michel & André Stenzel, 2018. "Policy Evaluation in Behavioral Models," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_061v1, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Mueller, Milton L. & Park, Yuri & Lee, Jongsu & Kim, Tai-Yoo, 2006. "Digital identity: How users value the attributes of online identifiers," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 405-422, November.
- Yao, Rui & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2022. "A variational autoencoder approach for choice set generation and implicit perception of alternatives in choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 273-294.
- Chunhua Wu & Koray Cosguner, 2020. "Profiting from the Decoy Effect: A Case Study of an Online Diamond Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 974-995, September.
- Roger Haefen, 2008. "Latent Consideration Sets and Continuous Demand Systems," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 41(3), pages 363-379, November.
- Tonna Emenuga, 2023. "Filtering Down to Size: A Theory of Consideration," Papers 2301.05649, arXiv.org.
More about this item
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-DCM-2023-09-25 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-ECM-2023-09-25 (Econometrics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2308.12470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.