IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2301.04853.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing for Coefficient Randomness in Local-to-Unity Autoregressions

Author

Listed:
  • Mikihito Nishi

Abstract

In this study, we propose a test for the coefficient randomness in autoregressive models where the autoregressive coefficient is local to unity, which is empirically relevant given the results of earlier studies. Under this specification, we theoretically analyze the effect of the correlation between the random coefficient and disturbance on tests' properties, which remains largely unexplored in the literature. Our analysis reveals that the correlation crucially affects the power of tests for coefficient randomness and that tests proposed by earlier studies can perform poorly when the degree of the correlation is moderate to large. The test we propose in this paper is designed to have a power function robust to the correlation. Because the asymptotic null distribution of our test statistic depends on the correlation $\psi$ between the disturbance and its square as earlier tests do, we also propose a modified version of the test statistic such that its asymptotic null distribution is free from the nuisance parameter $\psi$. The modified test is shown to have better power properties than existing ones in large and finite samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikihito Nishi, 2023. "Testing for Coefficient Randomness in Local-to-Unity Autoregressions," Papers 2301.04853, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.04853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.04853
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Bruce E., 1992. "Convergence to Stochastic Integrals for Dependent Heterogeneous Processes," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 489-500, December.
    2. Campbell, John Y. & Yogo, Motohiro, 2006. "Efficient tests of stock return predictability," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 27-60, July.
    3. Elliott, Graham & Rothenberg, Thomas J & Stock, James H, 1996. "Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 813-836, July.
    4. Jen-Je Su & Eduardo Roca, 2012. "Examining the power of stochastic unit root tests without assuming independence in the error processes of the underlying time series," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 373-377, March.
    5. S. Y. Hwang & I. V. Basawa, 2005. "Explosive Random‐Coefficient AR(1) Processes and Related Asymptotics for Least‐Squares Estimation," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 807-824, November.
    6. Horváth, Lajos & Trapani, Lorenzo, 2019. "Testing for randomness in a random coefficient autoregression model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 338-352.
    7. Stock, James H., 1991. "Confidence intervals for the largest autoregressive root in U.S. macroeconomic time series," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 435-459, December.
    8. Jonathan Hill & Liang Peng, 2014. "Unified Interval Estimation For Random Coefficient Autoregressive Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 282-297, May.
    9. Cavanagh, Christopher L. & Elliott, Graham & Stock, James H., 1995. "Inference in Models with Nearly Integrated Regressors," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(5), pages 1131-1147, October.
    10. Phillips, Peter C.B. & Lee, Ji Hyung, 2013. "Predictive regression under various degrees of persistence and robust long-horizon regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 250-264.
    11. Peter C. B. Phillips, 2014. "On Confidence Intervals for Autoregressive Roots and Predictive Regression," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 1177-1195, May.
    12. Phillips, Peter C.B. & Lee, Ji Hyung, 2016. "Robust econometric inference with mixed integrated and mildly explosive regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 433-450.
    13. Nishi, Mikihito & 西, 幹仁 & Kurozumi, Eiji & 黒住, 英司, 2022. "Stochastic Local and Moderate Departures from a Unit Root and Its Application to Unit Root Testing," Discussion Papers 2022-02, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Distaso, Walter, 2008. "Testing for unit root processes in random coefficient autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 581-609, January.
    15. Leybourne, S J & McCabe, B P M & Tremayne, A R, 1996. "Can Economic Time Series Be Differenced to Stationarity?," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 14(4), pages 435-446, October.
    16. Nagakura, Daisuke, 2009. "Asymptotic theory for explosive random coefficient autoregressive models and inconsistency of a unit root test against a stochastic unit root process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(24), pages 2476-2483, December.
    17. Alexandros Kostakis & Tassos Magdalinos & Michalis P. Stamatogiannis, 2015. "Robust Econometric Inference for Stock Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(5), pages 1506-1553.
    18. Phillips, Peter C B & Ouliaris, S, 1990. "Asymptotic Properties of Residual Based Tests for Cointegration," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 165-193, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikihito Nishi, 2023. "Testing for Stationary or Persistent Coefficient Randomness in Predictive Regressions," Papers 2309.04926, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yijie Fei & Yiu Lim Lui & Jun Yu, 2024. "Testing Predictability in the Presence of Persistent Errors," Working Papers 202401, University of Macau, Faculty of Business Administration.
    2. Andersen, Torben G. & Varneskov, Rasmus T., 2021. "Consistent inference for predictive regressions in persistent economic systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 215-244.
    3. Lorenzo Trapani, 2021. "Testing for strict stationarity in a random coefficient autoregressive model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 220-256, April.
    4. Lee, Ji Hyung, 2016. "Predictive quantile regression with persistent covariates: IVX-QR approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 105-118.
    5. Demetrescu, Matei & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M., 2022. "Residual-augmented IVX predictive regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 429-460.
    6. Phillips, Peter C.B. & Lee, Ji Hyung, 2013. "Predictive regression under various degrees of persistence and robust long-horizon regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 250-264.
    7. Demetrescu, Matei & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2023. "Transformed regression-based long-horizon predictability tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    8. Demetrescu, Matei & Georgiev, Iliyan & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2022. "Testing for episodic predictability in stock returns," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 85-113.
    9. Liu, Guannan & Yao, Shuang, 2020. "A robust test for predictability with unknown persistence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Bas Werker & Bo Zhou, 2020. "Semiparametric Testing with Highly Persistent Predictors," Papers 2009.08291, arXiv.org.
    11. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Break-Point Date Estimation for Nonstationary Autoregressive and Predictive Regression Models," Papers 2308.13915, arXiv.org.
    12. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Predictability Tests Robust against Parameter Instability," Papers 2307.15151, arXiv.org.
    13. Chengwang Liao & Ziwei Mei & Zhentao Shi, 2024. "Nickell Meets Stambaugh: A Tale of Two Biases in Panel Predictive Regressions," Papers 2410.09825, arXiv.org.
    14. Erik Hjalmarsson & Pär Österholm, 2007. "A residual-based cointegration test for near unit root variables," International Finance Discussion Papers 907, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    15. Liyu Dou & Ulrich K. Müller, 2021. "Generalized Local‐to‐Unity Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1825-1854, July.
    16. Horváth, Lajos & Trapani, Lorenzo, 2019. "Testing for randomness in a random coefficient autoregression model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 338-352.
    17. James A. Duffy & Jerome R. Simons, 2020. "Cointegration without Unit Roots," Papers 2002.08092, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    18. Rustam Ibragimov & Jihyun Kim & Anton Skrobotov, 2020. "New robust inference for predictive regressions," Papers 2006.01191, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    19. Trapani, Lorenzo, 2021. "A test for strict stationarity in a random coefficient autoregressive model of order 1," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Liu, Yanbo & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2023. "Robust inference with stochastic local unit root regressors in predictive regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 563-591.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.04853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.