IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2204.11451.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safe Delivery of Critical Services in Areas with Volatile Security Situation via a Stackelberg Game Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tien Mai
  • Arunesh Sinha

Abstract

Vaccine delivery in under-resourced locations with security risks is not just challenging but also life threatening. The current COVID pandemic and the need to vaccinate have added even more urgency to this issue. Motivated by this problem, we propose a general framework to set-up limited temporary (vaccination) centers that balance physical security and desired (vaccine) service coverage with limited resources. We set-up the problem as a Stackelberg game between the centers operator (defender) and an adversary, where the set of centers is not fixed a priori but is part of the decision output. This results in a mixed combinatorial and continuous optimization problem. As part of our scalable approximation of this problem, we provide a fundamental contribution by identifying general duality conditions of switching max and min when both discrete and continuous variables are involved. We perform detailed experiments to show that the solution proposed is scalable in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Tien Mai & Arunesh Sinha, 2022. "Safe Delivery of Critical Services in Areas with Volatile Security Situation via a Stackelberg Game Approach," Papers 2204.11451, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2204.11451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.11451
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mai, Tien & Lodi, Andrea, 2020. "A multicut outer-approximation approach for competitive facility location under random utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 874-881.
    2. Guillermo Gallego & Richard Ratliff & Sergey Shebalov, 2015. "A General Attraction Model and Sales-Based Linear Program for Network Revenue Management Under Customer Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 212-232, February.
    3. Wu, Tai-Hsi, 1997. "A note on a global approach for general 0-1 fractional programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 220-223, August.
    4. McKelvey Richard D. & Palfrey Thomas R., 1995. "Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 6-38, July.
    5. James M. Davis & Guillermo Gallego & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2014. "Assortment Optimization Under Variants of the Nested Logit Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 250-273, April.
    6. Benati, Stefano & Hansen, Pierre, 2002. "The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 518-530, December.
    7. Freire, Alexandre S. & Moreno, Eduardo & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2016. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the maximum capture problem with random utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 204-212.
    8. Werner Dinkelbach, 1967. "On Nonlinear Fractional Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(7), pages 492-498, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georg Bechler & Claudius Steinhardt & Jochen Mackert, 2021. "On the Linear Integration of Attraction Choice Models in Business Optimization Problems," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Basciftci, Beste & Ahmed, Shabbir & Shen, Siqian, 2021. "Distributionally robust facility location problem under decision-dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 548-561.
    3. Juan S. Borrero & Colin Gillen & Oleg A. Prokopyev, 2017. "Fractional 0–1 programming: applications and algorithms," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 255-282, September.
    4. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2023. "Robust maximum capture facility location under random utility maximization models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1128-1150.
    5. G．-Tóth, Boglárka & Anton-Sanchez, Laura & Fernández, José, 2024. "A Huff-like location model with quality adjustment and/or closing of existing facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 937-953.
    6. Méndez-Vogel, Gonzalo & Marianov, Vladimir & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2023. "The follower competitive facility location problem under the nested logit choice rule," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 834-846.
    7. Strauss, Arne K. & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2018. "A review of choice-based revenue management: Theory and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 375-387.
    8. Mai, Tien & Lodi, Andrea, 2020. "A multicut outer-approximation approach for competitive facility location under random utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 874-881.
    9. Lin, Yun Hui & Tian, Qingyun, 2021. "Branch-and-cut approach based on generalized benders decomposition for facility location with limited choice rule," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 109-119.
    10. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & He, Dongdong & Lee, Loo Hay, 2020. "Last-mile delivery: Optimal locker location under multinomial logit choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2022. "Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 953-965.
    12. Guang Li & Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2015. "The d -Level Nested Logit Model: Assortment and Price Optimization Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 325-342, April.
    13. Kameng Nip & Zhenbo Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Assortment Optimization under a Single Transition Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2122-2142, July.
    14. Laurent Alfandari & Alborz Hassanzadeh & Ivana Ljubić, 2021. "An Exact Method for Assortment Optimization under the Nested Logit Model," Working Papers hal-02463159, HAL.
    15. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Danny Segev & Chun Ye, 2020. "Constrained Assortment Optimization Under the Markov Chain–based Choice Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 698-721, February.
    16. Mika Sumida & Guillermo Gallego & Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu & James Davis, 2021. "Revenue-Utility Tradeoff in Assortment Optimization Under the Multinomial Logit Model with Totally Unimodular Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2845-2869, May.
    17. Nan Liu & Yuhang Ma & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "Assortment Optimization Under the Multinomial Logit Model with Sequential Offerings," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 835-853, July.
    18. Méndez-Vogel, Gonzalo & Marianov, Vladimir & Lüer-Villagra, Armin & Eiselt, H.A., 2023. "Store location with multipurpose shopping trips and a new random utility customers’ choice model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 708-721.
    19. Paat Rusmevichientong & Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "Dynamic Assortment Optimization for Reusable Products with Random Usage Durations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2820-2844, July.
    20. Erfan Mehmanchi & Andrés Gómez & Oleg A. Prokopyev, 2019. "Fractional 0–1 programs: links between mixed-integer linear and conic quadratic formulations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 273-339, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2204.11451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.