IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2104.06152.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Maximum Principle approach to deterministic Mean Field Games of Control with Absorption

Author

Listed:
  • Paulwin Graewe
  • Ulrich Horst
  • Ronnie Sircar

Abstract

We study a class of deterministic mean field games on finite and infinite time horizons arising in models of optimal exploitation of exhaustible resources. The main characteristic of our game is an absorption constraint on the players' state process. As a result of the state constraint the optimal time of absorption becomes part of the equilibrium. This requires a novel approach when applying Pontyagin's maximum principle. We prove the existence and uniqueness of equilibria and solve the infinite horizon models in closed form. As players may drop out of the game over time, equilibrium production rates need not be monotone nor smooth.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulwin Graewe & Ulrich Horst & Ronnie Sircar, 2021. "A Maximum Principle approach to deterministic Mean Field Games of Control with Absorption," Papers 2104.06152, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2104.06152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.06152
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2020. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Papers 2011.05589, arXiv.org.
    2. Jovanovic, Boyan & Rosenthal, Robert W., 1988. "Anonymous sequential games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 77-87, February.
    3. A. Bensoussan & K. Sung & S. Yam, 2013. "Linear–Quadratic Time-Inconsistent Mean Field Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 537-552, December.
    4. Horst, Ulrich, 2005. "Stationary equilibria in discounted stochastic games with weakly interacting players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 83-108, April.
    5. Blonski, Matthias, 1999. "Anonymous Games with Binary Actions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 171-180, August.
    6. Xuancheng Huang & Sebastian Jaimungal & Mojtaba Nourian, 2019. "Mean-Field Game Strategies for Optimal Execution," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 153-185, March.
    7. Daskalakis, Constantinos & Papadimitriou, Christos H., 2015. "Approximate Nash equilibria in anonymous games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 207-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moritz Voß, 2022. "A two-player portfolio tracking game," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 6, March.
    2. Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2021. "Trading with the Crowd," Papers 2106.09267, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    3. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2020. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Papers 2011.05589, arXiv.org.
    4. John Duggan, 2012. "Noisy Stochastic Games," RCER Working Papers 570, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    5. Dena Firoozi & Arvind V Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Principal agent mean field games in REC markets," Papers 2112.11963, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    6. Sachin Adlakha & Ramesh Johari, 2013. "Mean Field Equilibrium in Dynamic Games with Strategic Complementarities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 971-989, August.
    7. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich & Xia, Xiaonyu, 2022. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 327, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    8. Blonski, Matthias, 2005. "The women of Cairo: Equilibria in large anonymous games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 253-264, April.
    9. Duggan, John & Kalandrakis, Tasos, 2012. "Dynamic legislative policy making," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(5), pages 1653-1688.
    10. John Duggan, 2011. "Noisy Stochastic Games," RCER Working Papers 562, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    11. Yufan Chen & Lan Wu & Renyuan Xu & Ruixun Zhang, 2024. "Periodic Trading Activities in Financial Markets: Mean-field Liquidation Game with Major-Minor Players," Papers 2408.09505, arXiv.org.
    12. Piotr Więcek, 2017. "Total Reward Semi-Markov Mean-Field Games with Complementarity Properties," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 507-529, September.
    13. Light, Bar & Weintraub, Gabriel, 2018. "Mean Field Equilibrium: Uniqueness, Existence, and Comparative Statics," Research Papers 3731, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    14. Romuald Élie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Mean–field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 399-473, January.
    15. Camacho, Carmen & Kamihigashi, Takashi & Sağlam, Çağrı, 2018. "Robust comparative statics for non-monotone shocks in large aggregative games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 288-299.
    16. Eliaz, Kfir & Spiegler, Ran, 2015. "X-games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-100.
    17. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich, 2017. "Mean Field Games with Singular Controls," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 22, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    18. Vassili N. Kolokoltsov, 2021. "Quantum Mean-Field Games with the Observations of Counting Type," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    19. Qinglong Zhou & Gaofeng Zong, 2016. "Time-Inconsistent Stochastic Linear-quadratic Differential Game," Papers 1607.00638, arXiv.org.
    20. Arvind Shrivats & Dena Firoozi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "A Mean-Field Game Approach to Equilibrium Pricing in Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Markets," Papers 2003.04938, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2104.06152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.