IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uguaeb/258812.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of Nutritional Information on Attitude and Consumption: The Case of Yogurt

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor, Daphne S.
  • Weersink, Jeff
  • Funk, Tom
  • Goddard, Ellen W.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish an empirical link between information exposure, attitudes and behaviour. To do this, an after-only with control field experiment was undertaken using a print medium. The data resulting from the experiment was analysed using group comparison and regression analysis techniques.:] Both methods provided statistically significant results. From the group comparisons, it was found that the group exposed to the nutritionally positive advertisement when compared to the control group had a higher overall attitude toward the healthiness of yogurt consumption and a higher consumption level of yogurt. The group exposed to the article containing negative nutritional information had a lower overall attitude toward the healthiness of yogurt, fewer intentions of buying yogurt but had a higher consumption level when compared to the control group. From the regression analysis it was found that the advertisement affected consumption only by changing attitudes whereas the article affected consumption both indirectly through changes in attitude and directly by changing consumption. Surprisingly, the net affect of the negative nutritional information in the article was an increase in consumption. The implication is that information exposure in the form of articles appears to have a more direct impact on behaviour than does information exposure from advertisements. Unfortunately, exposure to an article does not necessarily imply recall of the content of the article, thus the intended impact on consumption, from exposure to the article, may be counter productive.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor, Daphne S. & Weersink, Jeff & Funk, Tom & Goddard, Ellen W., 1994. "The Effect of Nutritional Information on Attitude and Consumption: The Case of Yogurt," Department of Agricultural Economics and Business 258812, University of Guelph.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uguaeb:258812
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.258812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/258812/files/guelph-wp-028.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.258812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Venkateswaran, Meenakshi, 1990. "Effects of Generic Advertising on Perceptions and Behavior: The Case of Catfish," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 137-151, December.
    2. Richard P. Bagozzi & Alvin J. Silk, 1983. "Recall, Recognition, and the Measurement of Memory for Print Advertisements," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 95-134.
    3. Lutz, Richard J, 1977. "An Experimental Investigation of Causal Relations among Cognitions, Affect, and Behavioral Intention," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 3(4), pages 197-208, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aîda Mimouni & Ouidade Sabri-Zaaraoui & Béatrice Parguel, 2010. "Competitive Advertising Within Store Flyers: A Win-Win Strategy?," Post-Print halshs-00634439, HAL.
    2. Robert J. Shiller & John Pound, 1986. "Survey Evidence on Diffusion of Interest Among Institutional Investors," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 794, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    3. Robert J. Shiller & John Pound, 1986. "Survey Evidence on Diffusion of Investment Among Institutional Investors," NBER Working Papers 1851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Verhallen, T.M.M. & Pieters, R., 1984. "Attitude theory and behavioral costs," Other publications TiSEM 7cae95a3-287c-403e-ad95-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Jae-Hwan Han & R. Wes Harrison, 2007. "Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 700-719.
    6. Mimouni Chaabane, Aîda & Sabri, Ouidade & Parguel, Béatrice, 2010. "Competitive advertising within store flyers: A win–win strategy?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 478-486.
    7. Yi-Lin Tsai & Elisabeth Honka, 2021. "Informational and Noninformational Advertising Content," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1030-1058, November.
    8. Owens, Martin & Ramsey, Elaine & Loane, Sharon, 2018. "Resolving post-formation challenges in shared IJVs: The impact of shared IJV structure on inter-partner relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 584-593.
    9. Dominique M. Hanssens & Koen H. Pauwels & Shuba Srinivasan & Marc Vanhuele & Gokhan Yildirim, 2014. "Consumer Attitude Metrics for Guiding Marketing Mix Decisions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 534-550, July.
    10. Kongsompong, Kritika & Green, Robert T. & Patterson, Paul G., 2009. "Collectivism and social influence in the buying decision: A four-country study of inter- and intra-national differences," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 142-149.
    11. Teratanavat, Ratapol P. & Hooker, Neal H. & Haugtvedt, Curtis P. & Rucker, Derek D., 2004. "Consumer Understanding And Use Of Health Information On Product Labels: Marketing Implications For Functional Food," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20413, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Huang, Jinsong & Su, Song & Zhou, Liuning & Liu, Xi, 2013. "Attitude Toward the Viral Ad: Expanding Traditional Advertising Models to Interactive Advertising," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 36-46.
    13. Shunyao Yan & Klaus M. Miller & Bernd Skiera, 2020. "How Does the Adoption of Ad Blockers Affect News Consumption?," Papers 2005.06840, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    14. Salois, Matthew J. & Reilly, Amber, 2014. "Consumer Response to Perceived Value and Generic Advertising," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 43(1), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Herrmann, Robert O. & Rauniyar, Ganesh P. & Hanson, Gregory D. & Wang, Guoquing, 1994. "Identifying Frequent Seafood Purchasers In The Northeastern U.S," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Henry W. Kinnucan & Yuliang Miao, 1999. "Media-specific returns to generic advertising: The case of catfish," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 81-99.
    17. X. M. Gao & Anderson Reynolds & Jonq-Ying Lee, 1993. "A structural latent variable approach to modelling consumer perception: A case study of orange juice," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 317-324.
    18. Ramadania & Rianti Ardana Reswari & Endang Dhamayantie, 2018. "Discovering Chinese Product Strategies on Stimulating Attitude and Intention: Involvement of Innovation, Country-of-Origin and Knowledge," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 16(3 (Fall)), pages 215-234.
    19. Xu, Xun & Loke, Matthew K. & Leung, PingSun, 2015. "Is There a Price Premium for Local Food? The Case of the Fresh Lettuce Market in Hawaii," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 44(01), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Paul M. Patterson & Hans Olofsson & Timothy J. Richards & Sharon Sass, 1999. "An empirical analysis of state agricultural product promotions: A case study on Arizona Grown," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 179-196.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uguaeb:258812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dagueca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.