IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Targeting Of U.S. Agricultural Export Subsidies: A Theoretical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Haley, Stephen L.

Abstract

The United States has proposed that all direct and most indirect agricultural export subsidies be eliminated by the year 2000. Prospects for success depend on major agricultural exporters reaching a consensus that elimination of the subsidies would be mutually beneficial. This report illustrates a methodology that can be refined to show whether the United States has the power to influence other exporters, especially the European Community (EC). It is assumed that the United States seeks a consensus based on U.S. capacity to threaten to use targeted export subsidies to disrupt world wheat and corn markets to its own benefit. Preliminary results indicate that there are potentially large gains to a targeted subsidy program for wheat but probably not for corn. The marginal gain to a program involving more than $2.5 billion is likely to be small. If the EC decides to target its wheat subsidies in response to the U.S. program, it can more than offset the losses due to the U.S. program.

Suggested Citation

  • Haley, Stephen L., 1988. "Targeting Of U.S. Agricultural Export Subsidies: A Theoretical Analysis," Staff Reports 278018, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278018
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278018/files/ers-report-344.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip C. Abbott & Philip L. Paarlberg & Jerry A. Sharples, 1987. "Targeted Agricultural Export Subsidies and Social Welfare," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(4), pages 723-732.
    2. Sharples, Jerry A., 1984. "The Economics of Targeted Export Subsidies," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279071, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Sharples, Jerry A. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1988. "Forces that Could Expand U.S. Wheat Exports: Estimates From a World Wheat Trade Model," Staff Reports 277990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Roningen, Vernon & Sullivan, John & Wainio, John, 1987. "The Impact of the Removal of Support to Agriculture in Developed Countries," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269904, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Gardiner, Walter H. & Dixit, Praveen M, 1987. "Price Elasticity of Export Demand: Concepts and Estimates," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 305286, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liapis, Peter S., 1989. "Estimation and Evaluation of Economic Community Wheat Export Subsidies," Staff Reports 278253, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seitzinger, Ann Hillberg & Paarlberg, Philip L., 1989. "A Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Literature Related to Export Assistance," Staff Reports 278240, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Grigsby, S. Elaine & Dixit, Praveen M., 1986. "Alternative Export Strategies And U.S. Agricultural Policies For Grains And Oilseeds, 1950-83," Staff Reports 277896, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Young, Linda M. & Abbott, Philip C. & Leetmaa, Susan E., 2001. "Export Competition: Issues And Options In The Agricultural Negotiations," Commissioned Papers 14624, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Mahe, L P & Tavera, C, 1988. "Bilateral Harmonization of EC and U.S. Agricultural Policies," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 15(4), pages 327-348.
    5. Unknown, 2006. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 2, Number 2, Fall 2006," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 2(2).
    6. Herlihy, Michael T. & Young, C. Edwin, 1996. "Issues in Agricultural Commodity Policy," Staff Reports 278808, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Canning, Patrick N. & Vroomen, Harry, 1994. "Welfare Impacts of a Trade Restriction: An Equilibrium Approach and Application in the Potash Industry," Technical Bulletins 156762, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Haley, Stephen L., 1995. "Product Differentiation in Wheat Trade Modeling," Technical Bulletins 156766, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & C. Tavéra & T. Trochet, 1991. "Technical Change And Ec‐Us Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 119-137, May.
    10. Sharples, Jerry A. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1988. "Forces that Could Expand U.S. Wheat Exports: Estimates From a World Wheat Trade Model," Staff Reports 277990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Roningen, Vernon & Dixit, Praveen & Sullivan, John & Hart, Tracey, 1991. "Overview of the Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278390, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Ballenger, Nicole S., 1990. "Export Enhancement, Exporting Firms, And Efficiency Of International Commodity Markets," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270895, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Roningen, Vernon & Dixit, Praveen & Sullivan, John & Hart, Tracy, 1991. "Overview of the Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278513, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Debnath, Deepayan & Thompson, Wyatt & Helmar, Michael & Julian, Binfield, 2014. "Long term consequences of changing global food consumption patterns on U.S. agricultural commodity export demand," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170490, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Haley, Stephen L., 1988. "Joint Products In The Swopsim Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Lee, Dae-Seob & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2002. "A Game Theoretic Analysis Of U.S. Rice Export Policy: The Case Of Japan And Korea," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19686, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Labson, B. Stephen, 1994. "Modeling distortionary aspects of the U.S. wheat program and policy reform," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 237-263, June.
    18. Saxowsky, David M. & Krause, Joyce Hall & Gustafson, Cole R., 1998. "Export Enhancement Strategies For Small And Medium Rural And Agricultural Firms," Agricultural Economics Reports 23307, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    19. Johnston, Brian G., 0. "An Australian Perspective On Agricultural Trade And The Uruguay Round," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    20. Johnston, B. G., 1990. "Targeting Australian Agricultural Policies For Trade Liberalization," Staff Reports 278342, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.