IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/337407.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bread Markets: A Systems Analysis of Interfirm Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Moriak, Theodore F.
  • Logan, Samuel H.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report Summary: This study developed a model of a bakery market to appraise the relative efficiencies of alternative methods of distributing bread. Particular emphasis was placed on simplicity in formulation, possibility of estimating parameters from available data, and keeping future data gathering costs low. The model was validated against behavior of wholesale bakers in 1960 and 1964. Analysis of three experiments shows the model to be a useful tool for measuring and appraising the relative efficiencies of alternative distribution systems and pricing policies. Market demand elasticities for bread were estimated from government and industry data. The estimated price elasticity was -0.372, and the income elasticity was +0.086. This means that a 10 percent increase in bread prices would cause a 3.7 percent decrease in per capita demand. A 10 percent increase in per capita disposable income would cause only a 0.9 percent increase in per capita demand. This model could be used to determine quantitative answers to important questions. What percentage of output might be wrapped as private label? What percentage of output might be distributed as drop stop or as dock pickup? What might happen to per unit profits if bakers more freely switched labels and distribution outlets? The answers to these questions could aid negotiation of contracts between labor unions and bakers as well as between bakers and chain stores.

Suggested Citation

  • Moriak, Theodore F. & Logan, Samuel H., 1977. "Bread Markets: A Systems Analysis of Interfirm Behavior," Miscellaneous Publications 337407, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:337407
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.337407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337407/files/AGERS-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.337407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard G. Walsh & Bert M. Evans & Eleanor M. Birch, 1964. "Some Consequences of Bilateral Oligopoly and Vertical Integration in Bread Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 161-172.
    2. Moriak, Theo F. & Logan, Samuel H., 1971. "Monthly Retail Demand for Bread," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 23(3), pages 1-5, July.
    3. Meinken, Kenneth W., 1955. "The Demand and Price Structure for Wheat," Technical Bulletins 157127, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Oliver E. Williamson, 1965. "A Dynamic Theory of Interfirm Behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 79(4), pages 579-607.
    5. George, P.S. & King, Gordon A., 1971. "Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States with Projections for 1980," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 11936, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornell, Laurence D. & Sorenson, Vernon L., 1986. "Implications of Structural Change in U.S. Demand for Meat on U.S. Livestock and Grain Markets," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201355, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    2. Tomek, William G. & Robinson, Kenneth L., 1977. "PART V. Agricultural Price Analysis and Outlook," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337217.
    3. Leathers, Howard D., 1979. "A Primer On Nutrition Policy In The United States," Staff Papers 13268, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Rembisz, Wlodzimierz, 1989. "The Anatomy Of 'Balanced' Growth In Agriculture," Staff Papers 13650, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Rae, A. N., 1973. "Economic Aspects of New Zealand Apple Production with Policy Alternatives," Market Research Centre Archive 260698, Massey University, Department of Applied and International Economics.
    6. LeVeen, E. Phillip & Gustafson, Mark R., 1978. "The Potential Impact of Direct-Marketing Policies on the Economic Viability of Small Fruit and Vegetable Farms in California," Research Reports 263837, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.
    7. Greenshields, Bruce L., 1977. "Impact of a Resale Price Increase on Japan's Wheat Imports," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 146227, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Vassilopoulos, Achilleas & Klonaris, Stathis & Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Lazaridis, Panagiotis, 2012. "Modeling quality demand with data from Household Budget Surveys: An application to meat and fish products in Greece," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2744-2750.
    10. Capps, Oral Jr. & Havlicek, Joseph Jr., 1980. "National And Regional Household Demands For Meats And Seafood In The U.S.: A Complete Systems Approach," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278409, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Griffith, G.R., 2000. "Competition in the Food Marketing Chain," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 171911, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Hoffman, Robert G., 1973. "Wheat -- Regional Supply Analysis," Miscellaneous Publications 324762, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Yeung, M.L., 1982. "Effects Of The Food Stamp Program On Food Consumption In The Southern United States," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, July.
    14. Byrne, Patrick J. & Capps, Oral, Jr. & Williams, Gary W., 1993. "U.S. Demand For Lamb: The Other Red Meat," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 24(1), pages 1-9, February.
    15. Griffith, Garry R., 2000. "Competition in the food marketing chain," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(3), pages 1-35.
    16. Lamm, R. McFall Jr., 1977. "Demand And Supply Of Vegetable Oil Products In The United States: A Short-Run Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, July.
    17. Ghosh, Somali & Williams, Gary W., 2015. "Returns to Stakeholders from the American Lamb Checkoff Program: A Supply Chain Analysis," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205413, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Chavas, Jean-Paul, 1982. "A Study Of Structural Change: The Demand For Meat," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279153, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. van Driel, Hugo, 2000. "Collusion in transport: group effects in a historical perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 385-404, April.
    20. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:337407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.