IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsrr/147004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Marketing Maine Tablestock Potatoes

Author

Listed:
  • Berney, Gerald
  • Grajewski, Gregory
  • Hinman, Don
  • Prater, Marvin E.
  • Taylor, April

Abstract

The Marketing Services Division of USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) was asked by USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) National Program Leader and ARS’s New England Soil and Water Research Laboratory personnel to help with existing efforts to assist Maine fresh potato farmers in their search for alternative marketing strategies, and reverse the recent decline in the profitability of their operations. ARS researchers previously had conducted an exhaustive study defining possible crop rotations for potatoes to maintain soil fertility, reduce pest infestation, and preserve crop yields. In the course of the investigation, they determined that Maine producers needed help in marketing their products and turned to AMS for expertise in marketing and distribution practices. As a result, AMS’s Marketing Services Division initiated a study to evaluate the Maine potato industry and identify changes in business planning, product aggregation and handling, grower organization, distribution practices, and marketing activities that might help Maine’s fresh potato growers. In order to more fully understand the Maine potato marketing situation, AMS and ARS staff interviewed people involved in the potato industry. In January 2007, they contacted Maine Potato Board members and staff and scheduled a meeting with the board. Also at that time, AMS and ARS staff met with the Maine Commissioner of Agriculture and the USDA State Farm Service Agency (FSA) Director who helped them understand the financial situation of Maine tablestock potato producers. Beginning in June 2007, AMS researchers arranged on-site meetings with wholesalers and market news reporters in Jessup, MD, and Boston, MA, and with several potato farm operators in northern Maine. This was followed in 2008 by interviews and conference calls with chain store buyers in Virginia and Washington, DC; Cooperative Extension educators in Maine; potato brokers; AMS Market News staff in Benton Harbor, MI, and Boston; and USDA Federal inspectors. To better learn how Maine’s fresh potato producers could best penetrate the markets for “sustainable,” “local,” and “eco-labeled” foods, they met with the management and staffs of Red Tomato, Whole Foods Market, and Appalachian Sustainable Development, retailers on the forefront of developing direct supply chains for locally grown food. To understand the different potato products marketed to consumers, AMS researchers conducted informal surveys of retail merchandising practices for Maine-origin and other potatoes at chain store outlets. AMS researchers also undertook several supplemental analyses to identify Maine’s relative competitiveness with other sources of supply in major market locations. Prices of Maine fresh potatoes were compared with those of potatoes from other production areas from AMS Market News data. The costs of rail, truck, and water transportation for Maine and other fresh potatoes to major market locations were also examined using waybill data, to understand the transportation burden faced by Maine’s fresh potato producers. The cost of energy and Maine’s position in the competitive world of electricity, fuel, and natural gas supply and rates were compared with other producing areas to highlight the challenges Maine faces. The report also examines how fresh potato growers, repackers, and marketers in other parts of the country use cooperative marketing and supply control mechanisms, category management, and branding/promotional programs to enhance marketing efficiency and performance, and how channel diversification into processed market items, such as dehydrated products, starch, and plastics can help support fresh potato growers by creating alternative outlets for grade 2 and cull potatoes.

Suggested Citation

  • Berney, Gerald & Grajewski, Gregory & Hinman, Don & Prater, Marvin E. & Taylor, April, 2010. "Marketing Maine Tablestock Potatoes," Research Reports 147004, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsrr:147004
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.147004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/147004/files/Maine%20Potatoes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.147004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Travis A. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Huang, Chung L., 2008. "Organic Premiums of U.S. Fresh Produce," 2008 Conference, April 21-22, 2008, St. Louis, Missouri 37626, NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    2. Stewart, Hayden, 2006. "How Low Has the Farm Share of Retail Food Prices Really Fallen?," Economic Research Report 7241, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Tropp, Debra & Ragland, Edward & Barham, James, 2008. "Supply Chain Basics: The Dynamics of Change in the U.S. Food Marketing Environment," Research Reports 148268, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    4. Smith, Travis A. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2012. "Consumers Willing To Pay a Premium for Organic Produce," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-2, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Owusu, Victor & Owusu, Michael Anifori, 2010. "Measuring Market Potential for Fresh Organic Fruit and Vegetable in Ghana," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 95955, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    3. Elofsson, Katarina & Bengtsson, Niklas & Matsdotter, Elina & Arntyr, Johan, 2016. "The impact of climate information on milk demand: Evidence from a field experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 14-23.
    4. Kuchler, Fred & Stewart, Hayden, 2008. "Price Trends Are Similar for Fruits, Vegetables, and Snack Foods," Economic Research Report 56447, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Edward C. Jaenicke & Andrea C. Carlson, 2015. "Estimating and Investigating Organic Premiums for Retail‐Level Food Products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 453-471, October.
    6. Schrock, Rebecca, 2010. "Determinants Of The Demand For Organic And Conventional Fresh Milk In Germany– An Econometric Analysis," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116387, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Kayode Ajewole & Elliott Dennis & Ted C. Schroeder & Jason Bergtold, 2021. "Relative valuation of food and non‐food risks with a comparison to actuarial values: A best–worst approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 927-943, November.
    8. Carlson, Andrea & Jaenicke, Edward, 2016. "Changes in Retail Organic Price Premiums from 2004 to 2010," Economic Research Report 242448, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Carlson, Andrea C. & Waldrop, Megan, 2018. "Estimating Retail Organic Price Premiums for Snack Foods Using Scanner Data from 2013 to 2016," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274053, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Abraben, Lane A. & Grogan, Kelly A. & Gao, Zhifeng, 2017. "Organic price premium or penalty? A comparative market analysis of organic wines from Tuscany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 154-165.
    11. Jones, Michael S. & Brown, Zachary S., 2023. "Food for thought: Assessing the consumer welfare impacts of deploying irreversible, landscape-scale biotechnologies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Ferrier, Peyton M. & Zhen, Chen & Bovay, John, 2023. "Price and Welfare Effects of the Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    13. López, Ramón E. & Yoon, Sang W., 2020. "Sustainable development: Structural transformation and the consumer demand," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 22-38.
    14. Ramón López & Sang Won Yoon, 2013. "Sustainable Economic Growth: Structural Transformation with Consumption Flexibility," Working Papers wp375, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    15. McFadden, Jonathan R. & Huffman, Wallace E., 2017. "Willingness-to-pay for natural, organic, and conventional foods: The effects of information and meaningful labels," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 214-232.
    16. Anuj Mittal & Caroline C. Krejci & Teri J. Craven, 2018. "Logistics Best Practices for Regional Food Systems: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-44, January.
    17. Kathryn Boys & David Willis & Carlos Carpio, 2014. "Consumer willingness to pay for organic and locally grown produce on Dominica: insights into the potential for an “Organic Island”," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 595-617, June.
    18. Zhuang, Yan & Dimitri, Carolyn & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2010. "Price Reactions And Organic Price Premiums For Private Label And Branded Milk," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116388, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Probst, Lorenz & Houedjofonon, Elysée & Ayerakwa, Hayford Mensah & Haas, Rainer, 2012. "Will they buy it? The potential for marketing organic vegetables in the food vending sector to strengthen vegetable safety: A choice experiment study in three West African cities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 296-308.
    20. He, Na & Bernard, John C., 2011. "Differences in WTP and Consumer Demand for Organic and Non-GM Fresh and Processed Foods," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsrr:147004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.