IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332626.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A new generation of scientists? The impact of STEM-qualified workers on the Australian economy

Author

Listed:
  • Dixon, Janine

Abstract

Developing capacity in “STEM” (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) is often considered by policy makers to be a panacea for economic growth. We investigate the potential impacts on the Australian economy of a boost to the STEM sector using the single-region, dynamic Victoria University (VU) model of the Australian economy. We consider two scenarios. In the first, we explore the potential for growth through building up the supply of STEM qualified workers. We find a positive deviation in GDP from the business-as-usual forecast in the medium term. The benefit to the economy of additional STEM qualified workers gradually declines as the supply of these workers grows, until the average wage received by STEM workers, initially more than the national average, falls to below the national average wage. For every additional STEM worker, demographic constraints mean that the economy loses a non-STEM worker – perhaps an artist, a labourer, or a hairdresser. In the long run, this has a negative impact. In the second scenario, we analyse the impact of a boost to demand for exports of STEM commodities. The scenario is set up to reflect a compositional change only, with the demand for non-STEM exports declining so that the terms of trade remains on its business-as-usual forecast trajectory. Over the forecast period of 20 years, we find that this compositional change has a positive impact on economic growth. In addition to the usual CGE framework embedded in the 115-industry VU model, in this project we use two detailed industry by occupation matrices, the first specified in wage bill weights and the second in head counts. For these matrices, 97 occupations are identified. Furthermore, we utilise matrices of occupation by skill in wage bill and head count weights, in which 56 “skills” are identified, comprised of 11 fields of study cross-classified by 5 levels of attainment and a final category for no post-school qualification.

Suggested Citation

  • Dixon, Janine, 2015. "A new generation of scientists? The impact of STEM-qualified workers on the Australian economy," Conference papers 332626, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332626/files/7726.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Andrew Giesecke & Nhi Hoang Tran & Gerald Anthony Meagher & Felicity Pang, 2015. "A decomposition approach to labour market forecasting," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 243-270, April.
    2. Boeters, Stefan & Savard, Luc, 2013. "The Labor Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1645-1718, Elsevier.
    3. G.A.Meagher & Felicity Pang, 2011. "Labour Market Forecasting, Reliability and Workforce Development," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-225, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    4. Christine Carmody, 2013. "Slowing Productivity Growth - A developed economy," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 2, pages 57-78, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glyn Wittwer & Janine Dixon, 2015. "The Labour Module in a dynamic, regional CGE model," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-257, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    2. Janine Dixon, 2017. "Victoria University Employment Forecasts: 2017 edition," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-277, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    3. Aaron B. Gertz & James B. Davies & Samantha L. Black, 2019. "A CGE Framework for Modeling the Economics of Flooding and Recovery in a Major Urban Area," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1314-1341, June.
    4. Mark Sommer & Kurt Kratena, 2016. "The Carbon Footprint of European Households and Income Distribution. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 113," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58787, March.
    5. Mark Sommer & Raimund Kurzmann, 2016. "Kurzbeschreibung der Modelllandschaft im Projekt "Beschäftigungsmultiplikatoren und die Besetzung von Arbeitsplätzen in Österreich"," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58838, March.
    6. Martín Cicowiez & Javier Alejo & Luciano Di Gresia & Sergio Olivieri & World Bank & Ana Pacheco, 2016. "Export Taxes, World Prices, and Poverty in Argentina: A Dynamic CGEMicrosimulation Analysis [model, Argentina. Classification-JEL: C68, D58, I38, E62]," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(1), pages 24-54.
    7. Tim Jackson & Ben Drake & Peter Victor & Kurt Kratena & Mark Sommer, 2014. "Foundations for an Ecological Macroeconomics. Literature Review and Model Development. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 65," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47497, March.
    8. Marc Jim M. Mariano & James A. Giesecke, 2016. "Forecasting development outcomes under alternative surplus labour assumptions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(42), pages 4019-4032, September.
    9. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph F. Francois & Hugo Rojas†Romagosa, 2018. "Melting Ice Caps and the Economic Impact of Opening the Northern Sea Route," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(610), pages 1095-1127, May.
    10. Popp, Martin, 2023. "How elastic is labor demand? A meta-analysis for the German labor market," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 57, pages 1-14.
    11. Kenneth Castellanos & Garth Heutel, 2024. "Unemployment, Labor Mobility, and Climate Policy," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-40.
    12. Roberto Roson, 2022. "Underemployment in a Computable General Equilibrium Model," Working Papers 2022:17, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    13. Sommer, Mark & Kratena, Kurt, 2017. "The Carbon Footprint of European Households and Income Distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 62-72.
    14. Konstantins Benkovskis & Eduards Goluzins & Olegs Tkacevs, 2016. "CGE model with fiscal sector for Latvia," Working Papers 2016/01, Latvijas Banka.
    15. Ina Meyer & Mark Sommer & Kurt Kratena, 2018. "Energy Scenarios 2050 for Austria," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61089, March.
    16. Kurt Kratena & Mark Sommer, 2014. "Labour Market Policy and Environmental Fiscal Devaluation: A Cure for Spain in the Aftermath of the Great Recession?," WIFO Working Papers 476, WIFO.
    17. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph Francois, 2014. "Bilateral Exchange Rates and Jobs," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 275-298, May.
    18. Lichter, Andreas & Peichl, Andreas & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2015. "The own-wage elasticity of labor demand: A meta-regression analysis," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 94-119.
    19. Dorothée Boccanfuso & Massa Coulibaly & Luc Savard & Govinda Timilsina, 2018. "Macroeconomic and Distributional Impacts of Jatropha Based Biodiesel in Mali," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Andreas Peichl, 2016. "Linking Microsimulation and CGE models," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(1), pages 167-174.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor and Human Capital;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.