IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Analysis of a BIMSTEC-Japan Free Trade Area

Author

Listed:
  • Strutt, Anna

Abstract

The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is a subregional economic grouping comprising Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Myanmar, Bhutan, Thailand and Sri Lanka. The BIMSTEC Free Trade Framework Agreement sets out a program of ambitious preferential trade liberalization between the member countries. There has also been some discussion of promoting further economic integration with Japan. However, incorporating Japan into the preferential trade agreement would substantially change the composition of the group, offering a new range of opportunities and challenges for BIMSTEC economies. The current paper uses a dynamic global trade model in an effort to improve understanding of the potential impacts of a BIMSTEC-Japan Free Trade Agreement (FTA). We develop a baseline scenario to 2020 using GTAP-Dyn, a recursive dynamic version of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model. From this, carefully developed scenarios facilitate quantification of the impacts of progressive liberalization within the BIMSTEC FTA, both with and without the inclusion of Japan and also sensitive product liberalization. Our tentative results suggest that if the FTA is extended to include Japan, significant gains are likely for both the BIMSTEC region as a whole and for Japan. However, we find substantial variation in the impacts on individual BIMSTEC member economies, with results depending upon the exact form of the liberalization, including the timing of reform, the use of sensitive product categories and special treatment for countries categorized as Least Developed Countries. We also note the dynamic nature of the global trading environment, with implementation of other preferential agreements likely to impact on the outcomes of the agreements discussed here.

Suggested Citation

  • Strutt, Anna, 2008. "Dynamic Analysis of a BIMSTEC-Japan Free Trade Area," Conference papers 331715, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331715/files/4048.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Maria Mayda & Chad Steinberg, 2009. "Do South-South trade agreements increase trade? Commodity-level evidence from COMESA," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1361-1389, November.
    2. Antoine Bouët & Simon Mevel & David Orden, 2007. "More or Less Ambition in the Doha Round: Winners and Losers from Trade Liberalisation with a Development Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 1253-1280, August.
    3. Alemayehu Geda & Haile Kebret, 2008. "Regional Economic Integration in Africa: A Review of Problems and Prospects with a Case Study of COMESA," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 17(3), pages 357-394, June.
    4. Jean, Sebastien & Laborde, David & Martin, William J., 2005. "Sensitive Products: Selection and Implications for Agricultural Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 18860, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Borgatti, 2011. "Economic Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo & Mabe, Queen Magadi, 2020. "How financially integrated are trading blocs in Africa?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 84-94.
    3. Christopher Hartwell, 2022. "Institutions and trade‐related inequality," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3246-3264, July.
    4. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde, David, 2008. "The potential cost of a failed Doha Round," Issue briefs 56, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. von Braun, Joachim, 2007. "The world food situation: New driving forces and required actions," Food policy reports 18, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Ioannis N. Kessides, 2012. "Regionalising Infrastructure for Deepening Market Integration: The Case of East Africa," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 4(2), pages 115-138, December.
    7. Gregory N. Price & Juliet U. Elu, 2014. "Does regional currency integration ameliorate global macroeconomic shocks in sub-Saharan Africa? The case of the 2008-2009 global financial crisis," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(5), pages 737-750, September.
    8. Mehdi Shafaeddin, 2010. "The Political Economy of WTO with Special Reference to NAMA Negotiations," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 22(2), pages 175-196, April.
    9. Vincent Leyaro, 2021. "Trade effects of the East Africa Customs Union in Tanzania: Application of a structural gravity model," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-55, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Lohi Julie, 2013. "The Implications of HO and IRS Theories in Bilateral Trade Flows within Sub-Saharan Africa," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 175-202, September.
    11. Huan-Niemi, Ellen & Kerkela, Leena & Lehtonen, Heikki & Niemi, Jyrki S., 2009. "Implications of Trade Liberalization and Domestic Reforms on EU Agricultural Markets," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 12(4), pages 1-32, November.
    12. Bosello, Francesco & Eboli, Fabio & Parrado, Ramiro & Rosa, Renato, 2010. "REDD in the Carbon Market: A general equilibrium analysis," Conference papers 331978, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Bekkers, Eddy & Keck, Alexander, 2024. "Tariff spillovers and new rules for multilateral tariff negotiations," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2024-01, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    14. Alice Nicole Sindzingre, 2016. "From an Eroding Model to Questioned Trade Relationships: The European Union and Sub-Saharan Africa," Insight on Africa, , vol. 8(2), pages 81-95, July.
    15. Lionel Fontagné & Jean Fouré, 2013. "Opening a Pandora’s Box: Modeling World Trade Patterns at the 2035 Horizon," Working Papers hal-01299851, HAL.
    16. Hannah Muzee & Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe, 2019. "Towards an Inclusive Model of African Regional Integration: How Effective has the Linear Model been so Far?," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(1), pages 55-65.
    17. Gouel, Christophe & Mitaritonna, Cristina & Ramos, Maria Priscila, 2011. "Sensitive products in the Doha negotiations: The case of European and Japanese market access," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2395-2403.
    18. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & Mihaly Himics & Robert M'barek, 2016. "Cumulative economic impact of future trade agreements on EU agriculture," JRC Research Reports JRC103602, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Abdelaaziz Aït Ali & Rim Berahab, 2018. "Trade Integration in the Economic Community of West African States: Assessing Constraints and Opportunities Using an Augmented Gravity Model," Research papers & Policy papers 1817, Policy Center for the New South.
    20. Bosello, F. & Eboli, F. & Parrado, R., 2011. "Climate change impacts in the Mediterranean: a CGE analysis," Conference papers 332115, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.