IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nbaece/306477.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Market Journal Toolbox

Author

Listed:
  • Small, Becky
  • Mark, Darrell R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Small, Becky & Mark, Darrell R., 2006. "Market Journal Toolbox," Cornhusker Economics 306477, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:306477
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.306477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/306477/files/11-1-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.306477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Berck, 1981. "Portfolio Theory and the Demand for Futures: The Case of California Cotton," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(3), pages 466-474.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Musser, Wesley N., 1992. "A Historical Overview of Estimation of Historical Risk Coefficients," 1992 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk Meeting, March 22-25, 1992, Orlando, Florida 307862, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    2. Larry S. Karp, 1987. "Methods for Selecting the Optimal Dynamic Hedge When Production is Stochastic," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 647-657.
    3. David J. Pannell & Getu Hailu & Alfons Weersink & Amanda Burt, 2008. "More reasons why farmers have so little interest in futures markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(1), pages 41-50, July.
    4. Michael S. Haigh & Matthew T. Holt, 2002. "Combining time-varying and dynamic multi-period optimal hedging models," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 29(4), pages 471-500, December.
    5. Gary E. Bond & Stanley R. Thompson & Jane M. Geldard, 1985. "Basis Risk And Hedging Strategies For Australian Wheat Exports," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 29(3), pages 199-209, December.
    6. Ford, Beth Pride & Musser, Wesley N. & Yonkers, Robert D., 1993. "Measuring Historical Risk In Quarterly Milk Prices," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-7, April.
    7. Blank, Steven C., 1989. "Research On Futures Markets: Issues, Approaches, And Empirical Findings," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Dote, Grace, 1982. "Economic Research Of Interest To Agriculture, 1979-1981," Economic Research of Interest to Agriculture 7291, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. Berck, Peter & Rosen, Kenneth T., 1984. "Hedging with a Housing Starts Futures Contract," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0789s2xp, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    10. Hegde, S. Aaron, 2004. "An Economic History Of The Failure Of Broiler Futures," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20397, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Karp, Larry, 1986. "Methods for Selecting the Optimal Dynamic Hedge When Production is Stochastic," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt5jp9q454, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    12. Bown, A.N. & Ortmann, G.F. & Darroch, M.A.G., 1999. "Use Of Maize Marketing Alternatives And Price Risk Management Tools By Commercial Maize Farmers In South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 38(3).
    13. Chalfant, James A. & Callender, Robert N. & Subramanian, Shankar, 1988. "The Mean And Variance Of The Mean-Variance Decision Rule," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259434, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Lin, Hua & Fortenbery, T. Randall, 2006. "Risk Premiums and the Storage of Agricultural Commodities," Staff Papers 10277, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. Frechette, Darren L., 2000. "Hedging With Futures And Options: A Demand Systems Approach," 2000 Conference, April 17-18 2000, Chicago, Illinois 18941, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    16. Alexander, Vickie J. & Musser, Wesley N. & Mason, George, 1986. "Futures Markets And Firm Decisions Under Price, Production, And Financial Uncertainty," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Chalfant, James & Collender, Robert N. & Subramanfar, Shankar, 1988. "The Mean and Variance of the Mean-Variance Decision Rule," CUDARE Working Papers 198476, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Dixon, Bruce L. & Barry, Peter J., 1983. "Portfolio Analysis Considering Estimation Risk And Imperfect Markets," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Falatoonzadeh, Hamid & Conner, J. Richard & Pope, Rulon D., 1985. "Risk Management Strategies To Reduce Net Income Variability For Farmers," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Simmons, Phil, 1999. "Does Separation Theorem Explain Why Farmers Have So Little Interest In Futures Markets?," Working Papers 12933, University of New England, School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production Economics; Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:306477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daunlus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.