IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma22/345977.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Best-Worst Scaling Approach To Understand The Risk Management Preferences Of Saskatchewan Grain And Oilseed Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Atta, Cosmos
  • Micheels, Eric

Abstract

Farm managers must continuously manage risk in their farm business if they are to remain competitive and successful in their farm business operations. Although various risk management strategies can be adopted to reduce the uncertainties farmers face, the choice of a risk management strategy is influenced by the unique characteristics of the farm or the farm manager. Therefore, assuming a relationship between a particular risk and the strategy to be adopted may not necessarily be valid across heterogeneous decision makers. Using data from a 2017 survey, the risk management practices of grain and oilseed farmers in Saskatchewan is examined using a count-based approach of best-worst scaling and latent class cluster analysis. The results indicate there is considerable diversity among strategies producers perceive important.

Suggested Citation

  • Atta, Cosmos & Micheels, Eric, 2022. "A Best-Worst Scaling Approach To Understand The Risk Management Preferences Of Saskatchewan Grain And Oilseed Farmers," 23rd Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022 345977, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma22:345977
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345977/files/a_best-worst_scaling_approach_to_understand_the_risk_management_preferences_of_saskatchewan_grain_and_oilseed_farmers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Unterschultz, 2000. "Managing Market Risk in Western Canadian Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 48(4), pages 527-537, December.
    2. Ochieng’, Brian J. & Hobbs, Jill E., 2016. "Incentives for cattle producers to adopt an E. Coli vaccine: An application of best–worst scaling," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 78-87.
    3. Jeban Ganesalingam & Daniel Stahl & Lokesh Wijesekera & Clare Galtrey & Christopher E Shaw & P Nigel Leigh & Ammar Al-Chalabi, 2009. "Latent Cluster Analysis of ALS Phenotypes Identifies Prognostically Differing Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-6, September.
    4. Patrick, George R. & Wilson, Paul N. & Barry, Peter J. & Boggess, William G. & Young, Douglas L., 1985. "Risk Perceptions and Management Responses: Producer-Generated Hypotheses For Risk Modeling," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 231-238, December.
    5. David C. Hall & Thomas O. Knight & Keith H. Coble & Alan E. Baquet & George F. Patrick, 2003. "Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 430-448.
    6. Patrick, George F. & Wilson, Paul N. & Barry, Peter J. & Boggess, William G. & Young, Douglas L., 1985. "Risk Perceptions And Management Responses: Producer-Generated Hypotheses For Risk Modeling," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Mahnken, Curtis L. & Hadrich, Joleen C., 2018. "Does Revenue Diversification Improve Small and Medium-Sized Dairy Farm Profitability?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(4), November.
    8. Seda Erdem & Dan Rigby, 2013. "Investigating Heterogeneity in the Characterization of Risks Using Best Worst Scaling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1728-1748, September.
    9. Nathanael M. Thompson & Courtney Bir & Nicole J. Olynk Widmar, 2019. "Farmer perceptions of risk in 2017," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 182-199, April.
    10. Jesús Antón & Shingo Kimura & Roger Martini, 2011. "Risk Management in Agriculture in Canada," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 40, OECD Publishing.
    11. Sulewski, Piotr & Kłoczko-Gajewska, Anna, 2014. "Farmers’ risk perception, risk aversion and strategies to cope with production risk: an empirical study from Poland," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(3), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waweru, Caroline Waithira & Nyikal, Rose & Busienei, John R, 2017. "An Analysis Of Risk Attitudes And Risk Management Strategies Among Dairy Farmers In Murang’A County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 271063, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Larcher, Manuela & Schönhart, Martin & Schmid, Erwin, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Discussion Papers DP-59-2016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    3. Waithira, Waweru Caroline, 2017. "An Analysis Of Risk Attitudes And Risk Management Strategies Among Dairy Farmers In Murang’A County, Kenya," Research Theses 276428, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Malni Kumarathunga & Rodrigo N. Calheiros & Athula Ginige, 2022. "Smart Agricultural Futures Market: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Enabler between Smallholder Farmers and Buyers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Olson, Carl E., 1986. "Risk Management Over Time For Range Livestock Producers," Regional Research Projects > 1986: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 23-26, 1986, Tampa, Florida 272000, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    6. Heidelbach, Olaf & Bokusheva, Raushan & Kussaiynov, Talgat, 2004. "Which type of crop insurance for Kazakhstan? -- Empirical Results," IAMO Discussion Papers 14876, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    7. Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Azhar Abbas & Syed Asif Ali Naqvi & Muhammad Rizwan & Abdus Samie & Umar Ijaz Ahmed, 2020. "Drivers of Farm Households’ Perceived Risk Sources and Factors Affecting Uptake of Mitigation Strategies in Punjab Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Huirne, Ruud B.M. & Hardaker, J. Brian, 1999. "Perceptions Of Risks And Risk Management Strategies; An Analysis Of Dutch Livestock Farmers," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21507, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Manuela Larcher & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Working Papers 592016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    10. Nguyen, Nam C. & Wegener, Malcolm K. & Russell, Iean W. & Cameron, Donald & Coventry, David & Cooper, Ian M., 2007. "Risk management strategies by Australian farmers: two case studies," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 4(1-2), pages 1-8.
    11. Houston, Jack E. & Sun, Henglun, 1999. "Cost-Share Incentives And Best Management Practices In A Pilot Water Quality Program," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Meiring, J. A. & Oosthuizen, L. K., 1995. "Risiko-Bronne En Gepaardgaande Bestuursoptrede: Persepsies Van Besproeiingsboere Benede Die P.K. Le Rouxdam," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 34(1), March.
    13. repec:zbw:inwedp:592016 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. STEVEN C. BLANK & COLIN A. CARTER & JEFFREY McDONALD, 1997. "Is The Market Failing Agricultural Producers Who Wish To Manage Risks?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 103-112, July.
    15. Sonka, Steven T. & Hornbaker, Robert H. & Hudson, Michael A., 1986. "Managerial Performance And Income Variability For A Sample Of Illinois Cash Grain Producers," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278455, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Nguyen, Nam C. & Wegener, Malcolm K. & Russell, Iean W. & Cameron, Donald & Coventry, David & Cooper, Ian M., 2005. "Risk Management Strategies by Australian Farmers," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24295, International Farm Management Association.
    17. Vieth, Gary R. & Suppapanya, Pramote, 1996. "An Evaluation Of Selected Decision Models: A Case Of Crop Choice In Northern Thailand," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Heidelbach, Olaf & Bokusheva, Raushan & Kussaiynov, Talgat, 2004. "Which type of crop insurance for Kazakhstan? Empirical results," IAMO Discussion Papers 75, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    19. Dennis M. Conley, 1992. "Internal decision making in an agribusiness: A case study," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 387-397.
    20. Walker, Odell L. & Bernardo, Daniel J. & Gutierrez, Paul H., 1986. "A Monte Carlo Approach To Generating Distributions Of Cattle Returns," Regional Research Projects > 1986: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 23-26, 1986, Tampa, Florida 271997, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    21. S. Martin & F. McLeay, 1998. "The Diversity of Farmers' Risk Management Strategies in a Deregulated New Zealand Environment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 218-233, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty; Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma22:345977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.