IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma19/345897.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pr - A Comparison Of Succession Planning Consultancy Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Dooley, Anne Elizabeth
  • McCarthy, Iona Anne

Abstract

Farm succession planning is becoming increasingly complex requiring technical and process consultancy input from a range of rural professionals. However, despite the impact RPs have on succession planning, research on RPs’ farm succession consultancy is scarce. A case study with six rural professionals experienced in succession planning consultancy was conducted to seek information on farm succession consultancy roles and processes. This paper reports on the processes of the four who facilitated the entire process. All four incorporated the aspects recognised as being important in succession consultancy. However, there was considerable variation between their processes in the manner in which they processed through the steps, how they addressed issues, and managed people dynamics, their time frames and their emphasis on certain aspects. Their professional roles, client relationships, client’ expectations, their beliefs, skills and knowledge, confidence and background all contributed to these differences. This variability in their process suggests that defining a prescriptive process for effective succession planning consultancy beyond general guidelines is impractical. A range of approaches is likely to be effective, although some practices could be more effective than others and this may be worth further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Dooley, Anne Elizabeth & McCarthy, Iona Anne, 2019. "Pr - A Comparison Of Succession Planning Consultancy Processes," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345897, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345897
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345897/files/PR-2019-IFMA_McCarthy_97.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvesson, Mats & Kärreman, Dan & Sturdy, Andrew & Handley, Karen, 2009. "Unpacking the client(s): Constructions, positions and client-consultant dynamics," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 253-263, September.
    2. Schein, Edgar H., 1997. "The concept of client from a process consultation perspective : a guide for change agents," Working papers WP 3946-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Momparler, Alexandre & Carmona, Pedro & Lassala, Carlos, 2015. "Quality of consulting services and consulting fees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1458-1462.
    2. Alvesson, Mats & Kärreman, Dan & Sturdy, Andrew & Handley, Karen, 2006. "Unpacking the Client(s): Constructions, Positions and Client-Consultant Dynamics," Working Paper Series 2006/6, Lund University, Institute of Economic Research.
    3. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Methodological Flexibility in Systems Thinking: Musings from the Standpoint of a Systems Consultant," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 59-86, February.
    4. Hanisch, Bastian & Wald, Andreas, 2014. "Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-213.
    5. Pichault, Francois & Fatien Diochon, Pauline & Nizet, Jean, 2020. "Autonomy of independent professionals: A political process perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 623-633.
    6. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2022. "Toward a System Theory of Corporate Sustainability: An Interim Struggle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Marimon Viadiu, F. & Casadesús Fa, M & Heras Saizarbitoria, I., 2004. "¿Ofrecen Calidad Las Consultorías En Calidad? /," Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 10(1), pages 189-208.
    8. James Lapalme & James Conklin, 2015. "Combining Process Consultation and Structural Interventions," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 298-311, May.
    9. Heusinkveld, Stefan & Visscher, Klaasjan, 2012. "Practice what you preach: How consultants frame management concepts as enacted practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 285-297.
    10. Kevin Mole & Robert Baldock & David North, 2013. "Who Takes Advice? Firm Size Threshold, Competence, Concerns and Informality in a Contingency Approach," Research Papers 0009, Enterprise Research Centre.
    11. Kanghee Park & Boyoung Kim, 2024. "Effects of Individual Client’s Competencies on Construction Project Performance: Mediating Participation Attitude and Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Marleen McCardle-Keurentjes & Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette, 2018. "Asking Questions: A Sine Qua Non of Facilitation in Decision Support?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 757-788, October.
    13. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2023. "What do We Know about Vision? A Sustainability Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.