IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma19/345897.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pr - A Comparison Of Succession Planning Consultancy Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Dooley, Anne Elizabeth
  • McCarthy, Iona Anne

Abstract

Farm succession planning is becoming increasingly complex requiring technical and process consultancy input from a range of rural professionals. However, despite the impact RPs have on succession planning, research on RPs’ farm succession consultancy is scarce. A case study with six rural professionals experienced in succession planning consultancy was conducted to seek information on farm succession consultancy roles and processes. This paper reports on the processes of the four who facilitated the entire process. All four incorporated the aspects recognised as being important in succession consultancy. However, there was considerable variation between their processes in the manner in which they processed through the steps, how they addressed issues, and managed people dynamics, their time frames and their emphasis on certain aspects. Their professional roles, client relationships, client’ expectations, their beliefs, skills and knowledge, confidence and background all contributed to these differences. This variability in their process suggests that defining a prescriptive process for effective succession planning consultancy beyond general guidelines is impractical. A range of approaches is likely to be effective, although some practices could be more effective than others and this may be worth further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Dooley, Anne Elizabeth & McCarthy, Iona Anne, 2019. "Pr - A Comparison Of Succession Planning Consultancy Processes," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345897, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345897
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345897/files/PR-2019-IFMA_McCarthy_97.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.