IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25732.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving Agricultural Market Access for African LDCs: Deepening, Widening, Broadening and Strengthening Trade Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Wusheng

Abstract

The July Package of WTO agricultural trade negotiations and the recent Hong Kong WTO Ministerial declaration call for duty and quota-free access for imports originated from least developed countries, including the African LDCs (ALDCs). This paper discusses the merits of this proposal. The usefulness of preferences has been revealed by the high utilization rate of agricultural trade preferences and the case for improving trade preferences is supported by the possibility of preference erosions. Based on these, this paper interprets the July Package text as deepening, widening, broadening and strengthening trade preferences. A set of CGE simulations illustrates the potential impact of implementing this proposal. The first scenario confirms the ALDCs' vulnerability in multilateral liberalization. Deepening and widening trade preferences (scenario 2) would more than offset these negative effects. At the same time, harmonizing the preferences programs would help reveal true comparative advantages of the ALDCs. Adding selected advanced developing countries to the preference-granting group (i.e., broadening preferences) would further expand exports from the ALDCs. It should be noted that the added benefits from broadening preferences would be smaller than what could be achieved from the deepening and widening scenario. However, these estimated benefits would not be fully realized without strengthening the legal foundation of the preference programs and the ALDCs need to conduct domestic policies reforms aiming at creating an enabling environment for their exportoriented industry to take advantage of this opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Wusheng, 2006. "Improving Agricultural Market Access for African LDCs: Deepening, Widening, Broadening and Strengthening Trade Preferences," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25732, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25732
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25732/files/cp060309.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Ataman Aksoy & John C. Beghin, 2005. "Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7464.
    2. Brenton, Paul, 2003. "Integrating the least developed countries into the world trading system : the current impact of EU preferences under everything but arms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3018, The World Bank.
    3. S¯ren E. Frandsen & Hans G. Jensen & Wusheng Yu & Aage Walter-J¯rgensen, 2003. "Reform of EU sugar policy: price cuts versus quota reductions," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 30(1), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Giovanni Anania & Mary E.. Bohman & Colin A. Carter & Alex F. McCalla (ed.), 2004. "Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3471.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandre Gohin & J.C. Bureau, 2005. "Sugar market liberalization : modeling the EU supply of "C" sugar," Post-Print hal-01937090, HAL.
    2. Will Martin & Kym Anderson, 2006. "Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6889.
    3. Amani Elobeid & John Beghin, 2006. "Multilateral Trade and Agricultural Policy Reforms in Sugar Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 23-48, March.
    4. Aiello, Francesco & Demaria, Federica, 2009. "Do trade preferential agreements enhance the exports of developing countries? Evidence from the EU GSP," MPRA Paper 20093, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Jean, Sebastien & Matthews, Alan, 2006. "The Consequences of Agricultural Trade Liberalization for Developing Countries," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25471, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Elobeid, Amani & Beghin, John C., 2005. "Multilateral Trade and Agricultural Policy Reforms in Sugar Markets (Revised)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12419, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Jorge Nufiez Ferrer, 2006. "Increasing the Market Access for Agricultural Products from Bangladesh to the EU," CPD Working Paper 58, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    8. Jorge Nufiez Ferrer, 2006. "Increasing the Market Access for Agricultural Products from Bangladesh to the EU," Trade Working Papers 22288, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    9. Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Chakir, Raja & Gallezot, Jacques, 2006. "The Utilisation of EU and US Trade Preferences for Developing Countries in the Agri-Food Sector," Working Papers 18867, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    10. Federica Demaria & Sophie S. Drogue & Marie-Luise Rau, 2015. "EU preferences for agri-food products from developing countries: winning and losing due to the EU GSP reform 2013," Post-Print hal-02796661, HAL.
    11. Wainio, John & Shapouri, Shahla & Trueblood, Michael A. & Gibson, Paul R., 2005. "Agricultural Trade Preferences and the Developing Countries," Economic Research Report 7258, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. DeMaria, Federica & Drogue, Sophie & Matthews, Alan, 2008. "Agro-Food Preferences in the EU's GSP Scheme: An Analysis of Changes between 2004 and 2006," Working Papers 6151, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    13. Keck, Alexander & Low, Patrick, 2004. "Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when and how?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2004-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    14. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2021. "Investigating Alternative Poultry Trade Policies in the Context of African Countries: Evidence from Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315173, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. repec:lic:licosd:21408 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Luisa Menapace & GianCarlo Moschini, 2012. "Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 39(4), pages 539-566, September.
    17. John C. Beghin & Amani Elobeid, 2015. "The Impact of the U.S. Sugar Program Redux," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(1), pages 1-33.
    18. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman & Miriam Manchin, 2006. "Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 20(2), pages 197-216.
    19. Bo Xiong & John Beghin, 2017. "Disentangling Demand-Enhancing And Trade-Cost Effects Of Maximum Residue Regulations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 6, pages 105-108, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    20. Tanaka, Tetsuji & Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2007. "Productivity Shock and National Food Security for Japan," Conference papers 331597, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    21. Cornelius Hirsch & Harald Oberhofer, 2017. "Bilateral Trade Agreements and Trade Distortions in Agricultural Markets," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp240, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.