IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gadadp/260786.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Luxusmarketing bei Lebensmitteln: Eine empirische Studie zu Dimensionen des Luxuskonsums in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Schneider, Thea
  • Hartmann, Laura
  • Spiller, Achim

Abstract

Heutzutage zeigt sich das Ernährungsverhalten der deutschen Konsumenten immer differenzierter und ist mit einem wachsenden Involvement beim Kauf von Lebens- mitteln verbunden. In diesem Zusammenhang steigt die Nachfrage nach Qualitätsle- bensmitteln und Premium-Marken. Für das Marketing im Bereich hochpreisiger Le- bensmittel ergibt sich die Frage nach den kaufmotivierenden Produkteigenschaften und der Abgrenzung zum Konsumentenverhalten auf dem allgemeinen Lebensmit- telmarkt. Die Konzeptionierung zielgruppenspezifischer Marketingmaßnahmen er- fordert die Kenntnis der Einstellungen und Einflussfaktoren von Konsumenten der sogenannten Luxus-Lebensmittel. Bislang sind unseres Wissens hierzu jedoch kaum empirische Studien vorhanden. Basierend auf einer explorativen Faktorenanalyse untersucht die vorliegende Studie, welche Produktdimensionen Konsumenten beim Kauf von hochpreisigen Lebensmitteln leiten und in welchem Zusammenhang diese mit dem allgemeinen Lebensmittelmarkt stehen. Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Kauf- entscheidungen im Hochpreissegment wesentlich von den Attributen Qualität, Nach- haltigkeit und Genusswert beeinflusst werden. Nowadays, the nutritional behavior of German consumers appears to become more differentiated and is moreover related to a high involvement during the purchase of food. As a result, the demand for high quality food products has increased. The ques- tion arises which consumption motives are significant in the market for high-price food products and how these differ in comparison to the conventional food market. For the conception of target-group specific marketing strategies, new empirical con- sumer studies on the market for this so-called luxury food are needed. The develop- ments on the German food market have a high topicality, but there is a lack of those investigations. Based on an explorative factor analysis, this study investigates which product dimensions decisively influence purchase intentions for high-price food products in Germany. Moreover, it highlights the links to the conventional German food market. Results of the analysis show that different dimensions emerge. Espe- cially quality, sustainability and indulgence can be revealed as significant consump- tion motives on the market for high-price foods.

Suggested Citation

  • Schneider, Thea & Hartmann, Laura & Spiller, Achim, 2015. "Luxusmarketing bei Lebensmitteln: Eine empirische Studie zu Dimensionen des Luxuskonsums in Deutschland," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260786, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gadadp:260786
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.260786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260786/files/Diskussionspapier_1502_16-02-2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260786/files/Diskussionspapier_1502_16-02-2015.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.260786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DUBOIS, Bernard & LAURENT, Gilles & CZELLAR, Sandor, 2001. "Consumer rapport to luxury : Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes," HEC Research Papers Series 736, HEC Paris.
    2. Grunert, Klaus G., 2006. "How changes in consumer behaviour and retailing affect competence requirements for food producers and processors," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20.
    3. Brunsø, Karen & Fjord, Thomas Ahle & Grunert, Klaus G., 2002. "Consumers' food choice and quality perception," MAPP Working Papers 77, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    4. Veblen, Thorstein, 2009. "The Theory of the Leisure Class," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199552580 edited by Banta, Martha.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vollmer, Teresa & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2019. "The influence of Brazilian exports on price transmission processes in the coffee sector: a Markov-switching approach," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 291497, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Danne, M. & Musshoff, O. & Schulte, M., 2019. "Analysing the importance of glyphosate as part of agricultural strategies: A discrete choice experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 189-207.
    3. Matthias Buchholz & Oliver Musshoff, 2021. "Tax or green nudge? An experimental analysis of pesticide policies in Germany [A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(4), pages 940-982.
    4. Golo-Friedrich Bauermeister & Oliver Mußhoff, 2019. "Multiple switching behaviour in different display formats of multiple price lists," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 58-63, January.
    5. Gauly, Sarah & Kühl, Sarah & Spiller, Achim, 2017. "Uncovering strategies of hidden intention in multi-stakeholder initiatives: The case of pasture-raised milk," DARE Discussion Papers 1704, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    6. Steinhübel, Linda & Wenzel, Arne & Hulamani, Prashant & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan & Mason, Nicole M., 2021. "The role of space and time in the interaction of farmers' management decisions and bee communities: Evidence from South India," DARE Discussion Papers 2103, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    7. Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "Producers' valuation of animal welfare practices: Does herd size matter?," DARE Discussion Papers 1801, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    8. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2019. "Understanding the adoption of crop protection smartphone apps: An application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," DARE Discussion Papers 1905, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    9. Bilal, Muhammad & Barkmann, Jan & Jaghdani, Tinoush Jamali, 2017. "To analyse the suitability of a set of soical and economic indicators that assesses the impact on SI enhancing advanced technological inputs by farming households in Punjab Pakistan," DARE Discussion Papers 1708, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    10. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "E-commerce in agriculture: The case of crop protection product purchases in a discrete choice experiment," DARE Discussion Papers 1803, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    11. Elisabeth Vollmer & Daniel Hermann & Oliver Musshoff, 2019. "The disposition effect in farmers’ selling behavior: an experimental investigation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 177-189, March.
    12. Römer, Ulf & Mußhoff, Oliver & Weber, Ron & Turvey, Calum G., 2017. "Truth and consequences: Bogus pipeline experiment in informal small business lending," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260765, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Peth, Denise & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "Comparing compliance behaviour of students and farmers: Implications for agricultural policy impact analysis," DARE Discussion Papers 1809, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    14. Graskemper, Viktoria & Feil, Jan-Henning, 2021. "Values of farmers: Evidence from Germany," DARE Discussion Papers 2101, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. A. Rijpkema & E. M. T. Hendrix & R. Rossi & J. G. A. J. Vorst, 2016. "Application of stochastic programming to reduce uncertainty in quality-based supply planning of slaughterhouses," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(2), pages 613-624, April.
    2. Truong, Yann & McColl, Rod, 2011. "Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 555-561.
    3. Jiaen Hu & Luis Miguel López-Bonilla & Jesús Manuel López-Bonilla, 2023. "CSR Perceptions and Brand Attitudes in Chinese Luxury Hospitality: The Moderating Effect of Ads vs. Media Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Granato, Giulia & Fischer, Arnout R.H. & van Trijp, Hans C.M., 2022. "“Misalignments between users and designers as source of inspiration: A novel hybrid method for physical new product development”," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    6. Javier F. de la Ballina & Isabel de la Ballina, 2019. "Scarcity as a Desirable Attribute of Luxury Fashion Brands in Millennial Marketing," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(2), pages 153-170.
    7. F. Magnoni & Elyette Roux, 2011. "Stretching a luxury brand down: An experimental study of core brand dilution effects," Post-Print halshs-00644899, HAL.
    8. Alexandra Giuliana ANDRONIC, 2021. "Consumer Behaviour In Purchasing Luxury Goods During Economic Crises," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 25, pages 9-14, May.
    9. Ivis García, 2019. "Historically Illustrating the Shift to Neoliberalism in the U.S. Home Mortgage Market," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Alexander Antony Dunlap, 2015. "The Expanding Techniques of Progress: Agricultural Biotechnology and UN-REDD+," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 89-112, March.
    11. Zaif Alexandra & Cerchia Alina Elena, 2019. "The Importance of Integrating Digital Marketing within the Sales Strategy of Luxury Brands," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 119-127.
    12. Simona Bigerna & Andrea Marchini & Silvia Micheli & Paolo Polinori, 2023. "Pre- and during COVID-19: Households’ Willingness to Pay for Local Organic Food in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Silvia Ranfagni & Wilson Ozuem, 2022. "Luxury and Sustainability: Technological Pathways and Potential Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, April.
    14. BARTOLINI Stefano & SARRACINO Francesco, 2011. "Happy for How Long? How Social Capital and GDP relate to Happiness over Time," LISER Working Paper Series 2011-60, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    15. Lacroix, Caroline & Jolibert, Alain, 2017. "Mediational role of perceived personal legacy value between consumer agentic generativity and attitudes/buying intentions toward luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 203-211.
    16. Nobre, Helena & Simões, Cláudia, 2019. "NewLux Brand Relationship Scale: Capturing the scope of mass-consumed luxury brand relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 328-338.
    17. Stępień Beata, 2018. "Snobbish Bandwagoners: Ambiguity of Luxury Goods’ Perception," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 79-99, March.
    18. Llamas, Rosa & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2016. "The luxury of igniting change by giving: Transforming yourself while transforming others' lives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 166-176.
    19. Kim, Jae-Eun & Lloyd, Stephen & Cervellon, Marie-Cécile, 2016. "Narrative-transportation storylines in luxury brand advertising: Motivating consumer engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 304-313.
    20. Cavallo, Carla & Materia, Valentina C., 2018. "Insects or not Insects? Dilemmas or Attraction for Young Generations: A Case in Italy," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(3), June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gadadp:260786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iagoede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.