IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa145/200228.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Supporting Farm’s Strategies in GI Areas

Author

Listed:
  • De Rosa, Marcello
  • Bartoli, Luca
  • Chiappini, Silvia

Abstract

The paper deals with the support system of geographical indications (GIs): more precisely, it aims at investigating the territorial dynamics of the rural knowledge, by analysing the role of agricultur al extension systems (AES) as tool to support farm’s management and innovation in GI areas. By putting forward a milieu innovateur approach, we intend to verify eventual differences between GI and not GI farms in knowledge transfer and innovation adoption. Interaction and learning logics at the basis of this approach confirm differences even though with some exception based on territorial characteristics and models of AES governance.

Suggested Citation

  • De Rosa, Marcello & Bartoli, Luca & Chiappini, Silvia, 2015. "The Role of Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Supporting Farm’s Strategies in GI Areas," 145th Seminar, April 14-15, 2015, Parma, Italy 200228, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa145:200228
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200228/files/M.%20De%20Rosa%20L.%20Bartoli%20S.%20Chiappini%20_2015_%20The%20Role%20of%20Knowledge%20and%20Innovation%20Systems%20in%20Supporting%20Farm_s%20Strategies%20in%20GI%20Areas.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Crevoisier, 2004. "The Innovative Milieus Approach: Toward a Territorialized Understanding of the Economy?," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(4), pages 367-379, October.
    2. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Les dynamiques territoriales de connaissance : relations multilocales et ancrage regional," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 77-99.
    3. Olivier Crevoisier, "undated". "Beyond Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach," GRET Journal Papers 10-11, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Cecilia Mancini & Filippo Arfini & Mario Veneziani & Erik Thévenod‐Mottet, 2017. "Geographical Indications and Transatlantic Trade Negotiations: Different US and EU Perspectives," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(2), pages 34-40, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Fritsch & Viktor Slavtchev, 2007. "What determines the efficiency of regional innovation systems?," Jena Economics Research Papers 2007-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Fabio Campanini & Serena Costa & Paolo Rizzi, 2013. "The Machine Tool Industry in Italy: Industrial Innovations and Performances," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1391, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    3. André Cherubini Alves & Bruno Brandão Fischer & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2021. "Ecosystems of entrepreneurship: configurations and critical dimensions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(1), pages 73-106, August.
    4. Cécile Perret, 2011. "Des Modeles De Croissance Aux Theories Du Developpement Territorial Endogene : Vers Une Prise En Compte Du Capital Social," Working Papers hal-00995429, HAL.
    5. Markus Grillitsch & Magnus Nilsson, 2015. "Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(1), pages 299-321, January.
    6. Benoit, Florence & Belderbos, René, 2024. "International connection, local disconnection: The (heterogeneous) role of global cities in local and global innovation networks," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    7. Franz Tödtling & Markus Grillitsch, 2015. "Does Combinatorial Knowledge Lead to a Better Innovation Performance of Firms?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1741-1758, September.
    8. Michael Bentlage & Matthias Dorner & Alain Thierstein, 2015. "The knowledge economy and the economic crisis in Germany. Regional development, structural change and labor market regions," ERSA conference papers ersa15p978, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Nedko Mintchev, 2007. "Clusters – Characteristics and Structure," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 96-125.
    10. Matthias Siller & Christoph Hauser & Janette Walde & Gottfried Tappeiner, 2015. "Measuring regional innovation in one dimension: More lost than gained?," Working Papers 2015-14, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    11. Rolf Sternberg, 2010. "Neither Planned Nor by Chance: How Knowledge-Intensive Clusters Emerge," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Joan Crespo, 2021. "Agencies, scales and times of path creation: The case of IoT in Toulouse," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1527-1545, October.
    13. Thierry Theurillat & Jose Corpataux & Olivier Crevoisier, 2008. "Property Sector Financialization: The Case of Swiss Pension Funds (1992--2005)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 189-212, December.
    14. Heidi Bjønnes Larsen, 2014. "Governance, Quality Conventions, and Product Innovation in a Value Chain: The Case of the Spanish Salted Fish Market," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 412-429, September.
    15. Bernhard Truffer, 2008. "Society, Technology, and Region: Contributions from the Social Study of Technology to Economic Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 966-985, April.
    16. Julien Cusin & Elodie Loubaresse, 2015. "L’interclustering. De la communauté de pratique aux réseaux d’innovation," Post-Print hal-03235818, HAL.
    17. Jennifer Clark, 2010. "Coordinating a conscious geography: the role of research centers in multi-scalar innovation policy and economic development in the US and Canada," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 460-474, October.
    18. Huiwen Gong & Bernhard Truffer, 2024. "Changing from within: the interplay between imaginary, culture and innovation system in regional transformation," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2024(02), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    19. Alexander Ebner, 2013. "Cluster policies and entrepreneurial states in East Asia," Chapters, in: Sören Eriksson (ed.), Clusters and Economic Growth in Asia, chapter 1, pages 1-20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Peter Maskell & Leïla Kebir, 2006. "What Qualifies as a Cluster Theory?," Working Papers hal-01675959, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa145:200228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.