IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea21/313939.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impacts of reforming agricultural policy support on cereal prices: A CGE modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Balie, Jean
  • Valera, Harold Glenn A.
  • Narayanan Gopalakrishnan, Badri
  • Pede, Valerien O.

Abstract

Purpose - This paper investigates the effects of the total abolition of all forms of agricultural subsidies to producers and border tariffs on the prices of staple cereals. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use the GTAP global economy-wide model and focus on 27 countries and 8 regions. The GTAP database that is used contains information on budgetary transfers to producers and market price support such as domestic price support, tariffs, export subsidies, quotas on exports or imports and other border measures. Findings - The removal of subsidies is estimated to significantly increase the prices of wheat and other cereal grains in Japan, paddy rice in Malaysia and Indonesia, processed rice in Malaysia and Indonesia and wheat in Brazil and India. When border tariffs are removed, cereal prices are projected to fall in several countries, but the decline is more pronounced for wheat in Kenya and Japan, other cereal grains in South Korea and all staples in Nepal. Research limitations/implications - The alternative scenarios on the removal of agricultural subsidies in all agricultural sectors and the elimination of border tariffs are purely speculative as the analysis ignores important political economy considerations of agricultural and food policy reforms. Practical implications - The findings from this study point to the importance of implementing additional policy measures to mitigate the possible negative effect of repurposing the support to agriculture and ensure the food security and welfare of those categories of buyers who heavily depend on the price of staple food for their livelihoods. Social implications - This study’s findings confirm that the elimination of agricultural subsidies would impact global food security directly by making staple food less affordable to the poorest and indirectly by decreasing the available household budget for other presumably more nutritious food groups. Consequently, it is expected that these price increases could make segm
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Balie, Jean & Valera, Harold Glenn A. & Narayanan Gopalakrishnan, Badri & Pede, Valerien O., 2021. "The impacts of reforming agricultural policy support on cereal prices: A CGE modeling approach," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313939, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea21:313939
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313939/files/Abstracts_21_06_15_09_02_26_00__103_72_190_62_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans van Meijl & Petr Havlik & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Elke Stehfest & Peter Witzke & Ignacio Perez Dominguez & Benjamin Bodirsky & Michiel van Dijk & Jonathan Doelman & Thomas Fellmann & Florian Humpe, 2017. "Challenges of Global Agriculture in a Climate Change Context by 2050 (AgCLIM50)," JRC Research Reports JRC106835, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Laborde Debucquet, David & Mamun, Abdullah & Martin, Will & Piñeiro, Valeria & Vos, Rob, 2020. "Modeling the impacts of agricultural support policies on emissions from agriculture," IFPRI discussion papers 1954, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Marco Springmann & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Sherman Robinson & Keith Wiebe & H. Charles J. Godfray & Mike Rayner & Peter Scarborough, 2017. "Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 69-74, January.
    4. Abdullah Mamun & Will Martin & Simla Tokgoz, 2021. "Reforming Agricultural Support for Improved Environmental Outcomes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1520-1549, December.
    5. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    6. David Laborde & Abdullah Mamun & Will Martin & Valeria Pineiro & Rob Vos, 2020. "Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Support Policies on Emissions from Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 34453, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valera, Harold Glenn & Balie, Jean & Pede, Valerien, 2021. "The Future of Cereal Prices," SocArXiv mrfu6, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Wolfgang Britz & Roberto Roson, 2019. "G-RDEM: A GTAP-Based Recursive Dynamic CGE Model for Long-Term Baseline Generation and Analysis," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(1), pages 50-96, June.
    3. Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Gabriela Badareu & Claudia Gherțescu & Cătălin Valentin Mihai Lăpădat, 2024. "Does Common Agricultural Policy Influence Regional Disparities and Environmental Sustainability in European Union Countries?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Gaupp, F. & Ruggeri Laderchi, C. & Lotze-Campen, H. & DeClerck, F. & Bodirsky, B. L. & Lowder, S. & Popp, A. & Kanbur, R. & Edenhofer, O. & Nugent, R. & Fanzo, J. & Dietz, S. & Nordhagen, S. & Fan, S., 2021. "Food system development pathways for healthy, nature-positive and inclusive food systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113421, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Diaz-Bonilla, Eugenio & McNamara, Brian & Njuki, Jemimah & Swinnen, Johan & Vos, Rob, 2022. "The UN Food Systems Summit 2021: Lessons of the Gender and Finance Levers," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322751, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Simon J.Evenett & Mia Mikic & Ravi Ratnayake (ed.), 2011. "Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia," ARTNeT Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number brr10.
    7. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Trade policy analysis in the presence of duty drawbacks," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 353-371, April.
    8. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & George Philippidis, 2016. "Russian Roulette at the Trade Table: A Specific Factors CGE Analysis of an Agri-food Import Ban," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 272-291, June.
    9. Jiang, Tingsong, 2003. "The Impact of China's WTO Accession on its Regional Economies," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    10. Knut Einar Rosendahl & Jon Strand, 2011. "Carbon Leakage from the Clean Development Mechanism," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 27-50.
    11. Henseler, Martin & Piot-Lepetit, Isabelle & Ferrari, Emanuele & Mellado, Aida Gonzalez & Banse, Martin & Grethe, Harald & Parisi, Claudia & Hélaine, Sophie, 2013. "On the asynchronous approvals of GM crops: Potential market impacts of a trade disruption of EU soy imports," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 166-176.
    12. Adams, Philip D., 2008. "Insurance against Catastrophic Climate Change: How Much Will an Emissions Trading Scheme Cost Australia?," Conference papers 331770, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    14. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    15. Kym Anderson & Anna Strutt, 2012. "Agriculture and Food Security in Asia by 2030," Macroeconomics Working Papers 23309, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    16. Dhoubhadel, Sunil P. & Taheripour, Farzad & Stockton, Mathew C., 2016. "Livestock Demand, Global Land Use, and Induced Greenhouse Gas Emissions," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235271, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Federico Perali & Stefania Lovo, 2009. "Counterfactual analysis using a regional dynamic general equilibrium model with historical calibration," Working Papers 58/2009, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    18. Mai, Yinhua, 2008. "Removing border protection on wheat and rice: effects on rural income and food self-sufficiency in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(2), pages 1-19.
    19. Lucian Cernat & Sam Laird & Alessandro Turrini, 2003. "How Important are Market Access Issues for Developing Countries in the Doha Agenda?," International Trade 0302004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Palatnik, Ruslana R. & Kan, Iddo & Rapaport-Rom, Mickey & Ghermandi, Andrea & Eboli, Fabio & Shechter, Mordechai, 2011. "Land transformation analysis and application," Conference papers 332155, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; International Development; Research Methods/Statistical Methods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea21:313939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.