IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2242-d1538842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Common Agricultural Policy Influence Regional Disparities and Environmental Sustainability in European Union Countries?

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Georgiana Manta

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Nicoleta Mihaela Doran

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Roxana Maria Bădîrcea

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Gabriela Badareu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Claudia Gherțescu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Cătălin Valentin Mihai Lăpădat

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) funds, specifically the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (FEADR) and the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (FEGA), on a range of economic, social, and environmental outcomes across European regions. Utilizing Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) estimators, this research analyses 13 equations corresponding to various dependent variables, including employment rates, poverty levels, agricultural productivity, and environmental indicators such as greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy production from agriculture. This analysis covers the period from 2010 to 2021, and draws upon a balanced sample of 301 observations to ensure robust estimations. Results indicate that both FEADR and FEGA payments significantly influence these regional outcomes, though the effects vary depending on the specific economic or environmental indicator examined. The findings reveal that while FEADR payments positively impact rural employment, agricultural income, and renewable energy production, they are less effective in addressing poverty reduction and productivity enhancement. Conversely, FEGA payments exhibit a stronger influence on agricultural productivity and income, but have mixed effects on environmental sustainability. This study highlights significant regional disparities, suggesting that the allocation of CAP funds is uneven in its impact across regions. The implications for policymakers are clear: a more tailored approach is required to enhance the effectiveness of CAP funds in meeting diverse regional needs, particularly in promoting economic development while minimizing environmental harm. This study also emphasizes the need for further research to explore alternative policy mechanisms and innovative agricultural practices that can bridge the gaps identified in the current CAP framework. Limitations of this study include data availability and the inherent complexity of agricultural systems, which may affect the generalizability of the results across different EU member states.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Gabriela Badareu & Claudia Gherțescu & Cătălin Valentin Mihai Lăpădat, 2024. "Does Common Agricultural Policy Influence Regional Disparities and Environmental Sustainability in European Union Countries?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2242-:d:1538842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2242/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2242/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Torbjörn Jansson & Ida Nordin & Fredrik Wilhelmsson & Peter Witzke & Gordana Manevska‐Tasevska & Franz Weiss & Alexander Gocht, 2021. "Coupled Agricultural Subsidies in the EU Undermine Climate Efforts," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1503-1519, December.
    3. Coleman, William D. & Skogstad, Grace D. & Atkinson, Michael M., 1996. "Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 273-301, September.
    4. Kao, Chihwa, 1999. "Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 1-44, May.
    5. Lankoski, Jussi & Thiem, Alrik, 2020. "Linkages between agricultural policies, productivity and environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Laborde, David & Mamun, Abdullah & Martin, Will & Pineiro, Valeria & Vos, Rob, 2020. "Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Support Policies on Emissions from Agriculture," Conference papers 333141, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Roberto Henke & Theo Benos & Fabrizio De Filippis & Mara Giua & Fabio Pierangeli & Maria Rosaria Pupo D'Andrea, 2018. "The New Common Agricultural Policy: Ηow do Member States Respond to Flexibility?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 403-419, March.
    8. Konrad Prandecki & Wioletta Wrzaszcz & Marek Zieliński, 2021. "Environmental and Climate Challenges to Agriculture in Poland in the Context of Objectives Adopted in the European Green Deal Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Stefano Magaudda & Romina D’Ascanio & Serena Muccitelli & Anna Laura Palazzo, 2020. "‘Greening’ Green Infrastructure. Good Italian Practices for Enhancing Green Infrastructure through the Common Agricultural Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balázs Égert, 2018. "Regulation, Institutions and Aggregate Investment: New Evidence from OECD Countries," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 415-449, April.
    2. Bui Huy Nhuong & Ho Dinh Bao & Le Thanh Ha, 2024. "Embracing Green Foreign Direct Investment in a Journey toward Global Sustainable Economy: An Empirical Approach Using Statistical Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 435-446, September.
    3. Balázs Égert, 2016. "Regulation, Institutions, and Productivity: New Macroeconomic Evidence from OECD Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 109-113, May.
    4. Polemis, Michail & Fotis, Panagiotis, 2011. "Gasoline price asymmetries in the Euro Zone," MPRA Paper 32755, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Dongwon Lee & Yu-chin Chen, 2014. "What Makes a Commodity Currency?," Working Papers 201420, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    7. Ciarlone, Alessio, 2011. "Housing wealth effect in emerging economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 399-417.
    8. Hosan, Shahadat & Rahman, Md Matiar & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2023. "Energy subsidies and energy technology innovation: Policies for polygeneration systems diffusion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    9. Valérie Mignon & Christophe Hurlin, 2007. "Une synthèse des tests de cointégration sur données de panel," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 180(4), pages 241-265.
    10. BADALYAN, Gohar & HERZFELD, Thomas & RAJCANIOVA, Miroslava, 2014. "Transport Infrastructure And Economic Growth: Panel Data Approach For Armenia, Georgia And Turkey," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Tang, Kin-Boon, 2011. "The precise form of uncovered interest parity: A heterogeneous panel application in ASEAN-5 countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 568-573, January.
    12. Ronald MacDonald & Flávio Vieira, "undated". "A panel data investigation of real exchange rate misalignment and growth," Working Papers 2010_13, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    13. Win Chou & Dominica Lee, 2005. "Panel Cointegration Analysis of Audit Pricing Model," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 423-439, June.
    14. Fatma Erdem & Erdal Özmen, 2015. "Exchange Rate Regimes and Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1041-1058, November.
    15. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Kurt Hafner, 2008. "The pattern of international patenting and technology diffusion," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(21), pages 2819-2837.
    17. Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Marius Dalian Doran & Florin Liviu Manta, 2024. "Is there a direct benefit of using electronic commerce and electronic banking in mitigating climate change?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(10), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Chebli Mongi & Kais Saidi, 2024. "The Impact of Corruption, Government Effectiveness, FDI, and GFC on Economic Growth: New Evidence from Global Panel of 48 Middle-Income Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 10696-10721, September.
    19. Hussein Moghaddam & Robert M. Kunst, 2023. "The Role of Natural Gas in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Major Gas-Producing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasreen, Samia & Ahmed, Khalid & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2017. "Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 221-232.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2242-:d:1538842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.