IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/252704.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effects of “Fat Taxes” on Package Sizes, and Welfare Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Balagtas, Joseph V.
  • Nuno-Ledesma, Jose G.
  • Wu, Steven Y.

Abstract

We analytically study the pricing strategies a food retailer can execute under taxation when there is adverse selection. The questions are: how does the implementation of a tax regime affect the seller's ability to screen the market, and what effects do taxes have on package sizes and welfare distribution. We develop a parsimonious screening model in which the retailer offers a divisible good and does not know the buyers' willingness to pay. Under the more likely marketing strate- gies, we find that only consumers with high willingness to pay for the food see a reduction in their welfare; all package sizes are smaller, and the retailer sees her expected profit unambiguously diminished. These general results hold regardless of the type of implemented tax. Additionally, we briefly discuss how changes in ad valorem and specific taxes impact final prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Balagtas, Joseph V. & Nuno-Ledesma, Jose G. & Wu, Steven Y., 2016. "Effects of “Fat Taxes” on Package Sizes, and Welfare Distribution," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 252704, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:252704
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.252704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/252704/files/Balagtas%20Nuno%20_%20Wu-Fat%20Taxes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.252704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myerson, Roger B, 1979. "Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 61-73, January.
    2. Fletcher, Jason M. & Frisvold, David E. & Tefft, Nathan, 2010. "The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(11-12), pages 967-974, December.
    3. Zhen Miao & John C. Beghin & Helen H. Jensen, 2012. "Taxing Sweets: Sweetener Input Tax Or Final Consumption Tax?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 30(3), pages 344-361, July.
    4. Jeffrey Grogger, 2017. "Soda Taxes And The Prices of Sodas And Other Drinks: Evidence From Mexico," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(2), pages 481-498.
    5. Joanna P. MacEwan & Julian M. Alston & Abigail M. Okrent, 2014. "The Consequences of Obesity for the External Costs of Public Health Insurance in the United States," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 696-716.
    6. Sissel Jensen & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2011. "Indirect taxation and tax incidence under nonlinear pricing," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 18(5), pages 519-532, October.
    7. Bourquard, Brian & Wu, Steven, 2016. "An Economic Analysis of Beverage Size Restrictions," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235691, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuño Ledesma José G. & Wu Steven Y. & Balagtas Joseph V., 2022. "Nonlinear Pricing Under Regulation: Comparing Cap Rules and Taxes in the Laboratory," Working Papers 2022-10, Banco de México.
    2. John Cawley & Chelsea Crain & David Frisvold & David Jones, 2018. "The Pass-Through of the Largest Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: The Case of Boulder, Colorado," NBER Working Papers 25050, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Zhang, Yinjunjie & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Revisiting the Effects of Sugar Tax on Demand Elasticities - Evidence from the BLP Demand Model," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273978, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. John Cawley & David Frisvold & David Jones & Chelsea Lensing, 2021. "The Pass‐Through of a Tax on Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages in Boulder, Colorado," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 987-1005, May.
    5. Rebecca L. C. Taylor & Scott Kaplan & Sofia B. Villas‐Boas & Kevin Jung, 2019. "Soda Wars: The Effect Of A Soda Tax Election On University Beverage Sales," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(3), pages 1480-1496, July.
    6. Bonnet, Céline & Réquillart, Vincent, 2013. "Tax incidence with strategic firms in the soft drink market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 77-88.
    7. Gračner, Tadeja & Kapinos, Kandice A. & Gertler, Paul J., 2022. "Associations of a national tax on non-essential high calorie foods with changes in consumer prices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Zhen Miao & John C. Beghin & Helen H. Jensen, 2013. "Accounting For Product Substitution In The Analysis Of Food Taxes Targeting Obesity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(11), pages 1318-1343, November.
    9. Aguilar, Arturo & Gutierrez, Emilio & Seira, Enrique, 2021. "The effectiveness of sin food taxes: Evidence from Mexico," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Pourya Valizadeh & Shu Wen Ng, 2021. "Would A National Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Tax in the United States Be Well Targeted?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 961-986, May.
    11. Riera-Crichton, Daniel & Tefft, Nathan, 2014. "Macronutrients and obesity: Revisiting the calories in, calories out framework," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 33-49.
    12. Bourquard, Brian & Wu, Steven, 2016. "An Economic Analysis of Beverage Size Restrictions," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235691, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Hoy, Kyle A. & Wrenn, Douglas H., 2020. "The effectiveness of taxes in decreasing candy purchases," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Bonnet, Céline & Réquillart, Vincent, 2011. "Strategic Pricing and Health Price Policies," IDEI Working Papers 671, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, revised Jul 2012.
    15. Arteaga, Julio Cesar & Flores, Daniel & Luna, Edgar, 2017. "The effect of a soft-drink tax in Mexico: a time series approach," MPRA Paper 80831, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Nathalie Mathieu-Bolh, 2021. "Hand-to-mouth Consumption and Calorie Consciousness: Consequences for Junk-food Taxation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 49(2), pages 167-220, March.
    17. Arve, Malin & Zwart, Gijsbert, 2023. "Optimal procurement and investment in new technologies under uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Hongpeng Guo & Zhihao Lv & Junyi Hua & Hongxu Yuan & Qingyu Yu, 2021. "Design of Combined Auction Model for Emission Rights of International Forestry Carbon Sequestration and Other Pollutants Based on SMRA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Watabe, Akihiro, 1999. "The effect of liability-sharing rules in delegating hazardous activities," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 349-368, September.
    20. Eilat, Ran & Paunzer, Ady, 2008. "Optimal Bilateral Trade of Multiple Objects," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275716, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:252704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.