IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea10/61779.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Product Life Cycles and Innovation in the US Seed Corn Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Magnier, Alexandre
  • Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G.
  • Miller, Douglas J.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential changes in the length of product life cycles in the US seed corn industry. We use the observed survival time on the market for hybrids sold during 1997-2009 to conduct a survival analysis. Our empirical results show that the average lifetimes of conventional and biotech corn hybrids have decreased over the last twelve years at similar rates and that the rate of decline in the life cycle length increased since 2004. We also find that the shorter product life cycles are closely linked to the accelerated levels of biotech product innovation in the US seed corn industry observed over the period of the analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnier, Alexandre & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G. & Miller, Douglas J., 2010. "Product Life Cycles and Innovation in the US Seed Corn Industry," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61779, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea10:61779
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.61779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/61779/files/MKMLifeCycle.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.61779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seungki Lee & GianCarlo Moschini, 2020. "Estimating the Value of Innovation and Extension Information: SCNResistant Soybean Varieties," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 20-wp603, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Bastgen, A. & Holzner, C.L., 2017. "Employment protection and the market for innovations," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 77-93.
    3. Ma, Xingliang & Shi, Guanming, 2013. "GM vs. Non-GM: A Survival Analysis of U.S. Hybrid Seed Corn," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 42(3), pages 1-19, December.
    4. MacDonald, James M. & Dong, Xiao & Fuglie, Keith O., 2023. "Concentration and Competition in U.S. Agribusiness," Economic Information Bulletin 337566, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Seungki Lee & GianCarlo Moschini, 2022. "On the value of innovation and extension information: SCN‐resistant soybean varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1177-1202, August.
    6. Shakya, Sumadhur & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2012. "Valuing New Random GM Traits: The Case of Drought Tolerant Wheat," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 128033, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    7. Perry, Edward & Hennessy, David A. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2018. "Planting Rates in U.S. Maize: Improved Varieties and Learning," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274341, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Magnier, Alexandre, 2013. "The economics of adventitious presence thresholds in the EU seed market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 237-247.
    9. Shakya, Sumadhur & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2013. "Valuing New Random Genetically Modified (GM) Traits in Corn," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Feeney, Roberto Juan & Harmath, Pedro & Clay, Pablo Mac, 2020. "Brand Loyalty in Argentine Commercial Crop Seed Markets," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 9, April.
    11. Federico Ciliberto & GianCarlo Moschini & Edward D. Perry, 2019. "Valuing product innovation: genetically engineered varieties in US corn and soybeans," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 615-644, September.
    12. Saavoss, Monica & Capehart, Tom & McBride, William & Effland, Anne, 2021. "Trends in Production Practices and Costs of the U.S. Corn Sector," USDA Miscellaneous 312954, United States Department of Agriculture.
    13. Melinda Smale & John Olwande, 2014. "Demand for maize hybrids and hybrid change on smallholder farms in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(4), pages 409-420, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea10:61779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.