IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea00/21834.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Decomposed Regression Model For Measuring Structural Changes In The Flour Milling Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, C.S.
  • Hallahan, Charles B.
  • Schaible, Glenn D.
  • Leath, Mack N.

Abstract

This paper presents a decomposed Poisson regression model based on count data that evaluates the size distribution, the changing number of flour mills for each size class, and the concentration of market power, simultaneously. This model also allows us to test dominant price leadership model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, C.S. & Hallahan, Charles B. & Schaible, Glenn D. & Leath, Mack N., 2000. "A Decomposed Regression Model For Measuring Structural Changes In The Flour Milling Industry," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21834, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea00:21834
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.21834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/21834/files/sp00ki03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.21834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farris, Paul L. & Padberg, Daniel I., 1964. "Measures of Market Structure Change in The Florida Fresh Citrus Packing Industry," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Kim, C.S. & Lin, William W. & Leath, Mack N., 1991. "The Changing Structure of the U.S. Flour Milling Industry," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 43(3), pages 1-8.
    3. Gourieroux, Christian & Monfort, Alain & Trognon, Alain, 1984. "Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Theory," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 681-700, May.
    4. Chan, M W Luke, 1981. "A Markovian Approach to the Study of the Canadian Cattle Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 63(1), pages 107-116, February.
    5. Adesoji Adelaja & Rodolfo Nayga & Zafar Farooq, 1999. "Predicting mergers and acquisitions in the food industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 1-23.
    6. Varian, Hal R, 1984. "The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 579-597, May.
    7. Daniel M. Hellerstein, 1991. "Using Count Data Models in Travel Cost Analysis with Aggregate Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 860-866.
    8. Chambers,Robert G., 1988. "Applied Production Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314275, January.
    9. Philip Garcia & Susan E. Offutt & Steven T. Sonka, 1987. "Size Distribution and Growth in a Sample of Illinois Cash Grain Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 471-476.
    10. Robert N. Horn, 1988. "Analysis," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 56-58, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C.S. Kim & C. Hallahan & G. Schaible & G. Schluter, 2001. "Economic analysis of the changing structure of the U.S. flour milling industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 161-171.
    2. Gilligan, Daniel O., 1998. "Farm Size, Productivity, And Economic Efficiency: Accounting For Differences In Efficiency Of Farms By Size In Honduras," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    4. J. Shonkwiler & Nick Hanley, 2003. "A New Approach to Random Utility Modeling using the Dirichlet Multinomial Distribution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 26(3), pages 401-416, November.
    5. Shiro Takeda, 2005. "The effect of differentiated emission taxes: does an emission tax favor industry?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 17(3), pages 1-10.
    6. Susanto Basu & John Fernald, 2001. "Why Is Productivity Procyclical? Why Do We Care?," NBER Chapters, in: New Developments in Productivity Analysis, pages 225-302, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. John A. Curtis, 2002. "Estimating the Demand for Salmon Angling in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 319-332.
    8. David I. Stern, 2012. "Interfuel Substitution: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 307-331, April.
    9. Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr, 2007. "Marktstruktur und Preisbildung auf dem ukrainischen Markt für Rohmilch," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 41, number 92322.
    10. Gebhardt Flaig & Horst Rottmann, 2001. "Input Demand and the Short‐ and Long‐Run Employment Thresholds: An Empirical Analysis for the German Manufacturing Sector," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 2(4), pages 367-384, November.
    11. Meisner, Craig & Wang, Hua & Laplante, Benoit, 2006. "Welfare measurement bias in household and on-site surveying of water-based recreation : an application to Lake Sevan, Armenia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3932, The World Bank.
    12. Alejandro Plastina & Lilyan Fulginiti, 2012. "Rates of return to public agricultural research in 48 US states," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 95-113, April.
    13. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Thomas L. Cox, 1997. "Production Analysis: A Non‐Parametric Time Series Application To Us Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 330-348, January.
    14. Pan, Shihua, 1990. "The microfoundations of mixed system of planning and markets: some theoretical considerations and an empirical analysis of the Chinese agriculture," ISU General Staff Papers 1990010108000010876, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Frieling, Julius & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Estimation of Substitution Elasticities in Three-Factor Production Functions: Identifying the Role of Energy," FCN Working Papers 1/2016, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised Sep 2016.
    16. Nubern, Chris A. & Purcell, Wayne D., 1997. "Competitiveness of Dairy Producers in a Deregulated Market," Staff Papers 232553, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    17. Ang, Frederic & Kerstens, Pieter Jan, 2020. "A superlative indicator for the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator: Theory and application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1161-1173.
    18. Robert G. Chambers & Erik Lichtenberg, 1994. "Simple Econometrics of Pesticide Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(3), pages 407-417.
    19. Giorgio Barba Navaretti & Riccardo Faini & Bernard Gauthier, 2006. "The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Enterprises in Small Backward Economies: the Case of Chad and Gabon," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 452-465, August.
    20. Kim, C.S. & McElroy, Robert G. & Mishra, Ashok K. & Hallahan, Charles B., 2002. "Biased Biased Technological Progress In The U.S. Farm Sector: A Structural Perspective," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36526, Western Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea00:21834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.