IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/209304.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars

In: Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 23

Author

Listed:
  • Benleulmi, Ahmed Ziad
  • Blecker, Thorsten

Abstract

Once thought of as a product of science fiction, self-driving cars are discussed today as an unavoidable means towards improving transportation systems. In fact, many car manufacturers have announced their plans to deploy highly autonomous cars as soon as 2020; according to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) these vehicles are capable of reacting 'even if the human driver does not respond appropriately to the request to intervene (SAE level 4)'. There is however a long way to go before fully autonomous cars (SAE level 5) - where pedals and steering wheels are forgone and limitations to driving during severe weather or in unmapped areas are surmounted - are produced. Herein, the overall aim is to study the drivers and inhibitors of autonomous cars' acceptance across cultures with a special focus on the different risks that might deter consumers from using highly and/or fully autonomous cars. After an extensive reviewing of previous works, a research model based on UTAUT2 was developed and accordingly an online survey was conducted in the US and in Germany; 313 valid answers were collected and analyzed. The findings presented here have serious implications both on the academic field as well as the industry, especially in regards to the roles that risks, culture and gender play in the acceptance of fully autonomous cars.

Suggested Citation

  • Benleulmi, Ahmed Ziad & Blecker, Thorsten, 2017. "Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg Inter, volume 23, pages 99-115, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209304
    DOI: 10.15480/882.1449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209304/1/hicl-2017-23-099.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15480/882.1449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. K. Srivastava & Sindhu Singh & Vivek Srivastava, 2013. "The Role of Trust and Technology Acceptance Model(TAM) on Customer Acceptance of Mobile Banking: An Integrated Model to Improve Mobile Banking in Banking Sector-A Conceptual Paper," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 4(1), pages 31-43, January.
    2. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong & Lewis C. Chasalow & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 111-136, March.
    3. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    4. Reinartz, Werner & Haenlein, Michael & Henseler, Jörg, 2009. "An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 332-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing, Yan & Handy, Susan & Circella, Giovanni & Wang, Yunshi & Alemi, Farzad, 2020. "Exploring the Role of Attitude in the Acceptance of Self-driving Shuttles," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1509n72d, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Yoo, Sunbin & Kumagai, Junya & Kawabata, Yuta & Keeley, Alexander & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Willingness to Buy and/or Pay Disparity: Evidence from Fully Autonomous Vehicles," MPRA Paper 108882, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Maghrour Zefreh, Mohammad & Edries, Belal & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2023. "Understanding the antecedents of hedonic motivation in autonomous vehicle technology acceptance domain: A cross-country analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Kenesei, Zsófia & Ásványi, Katalin & Kökény, László & Jászberényi, Melinda & Miskolczi, Márk & Gyulavári, Tamás & Syahrivar, Jhanghiz, 2022. "Trust and perceived risk: How different manifestations affect the adoption of autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 379-393.
    5. Cylwik Stefan & Gabryelczyk Renata & Chlebus Marcin, 2020. "Ridesharing in the Polish Experience: A Study using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 7(54), pages 279-299, January.
    6. Zhao, Xiaoyun & Susilo, Yusak O. & Pernestål, Anna, 2022. "The dynamic and long-term changes of automated bus service adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 450-463.
    7. Nastjuk, Ilja & Herrenkind, Bernd & Marrone, Mauricio & Brendel, Alfred Benedikt & Kolbe, Lutz M., 2020. "What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Khan, Shah Khalid & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Stasinopoulos, Peter & Chen, Yilun & Warren, Matthew, 2024. "The impact of perceived cyber-risks on automated vehicle acceptance: Insights from a survey of participants from the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 87-101.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mütterlein, Joschka & Kunz, Reinhard E. & Baier, Daniel, 2019. "Effects of lead-usership on the acceptance of media innovations: A mobile augmented reality case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 113-124.
    2. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    3. Abdul Alem Mohammed & Basri B. Rashid & Shaharuddin B. Tahir, 2017. "Customer relationship management and hotel performance: the mediating influence of marketing capabilities—evidence from the Malaysian hotel industry," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 335-361, September.
    4. Christian Nitzl & Wynne W. Chin, 2017. "The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 137-156, May.
    5. Spanuth, Thomas & Wald, Andreas, 2017. "Understanding the antecedents of organizational commitment in the context of temporary organizations: An empirical study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 129-138.
    6. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2017. "The Relationship Between Informal Controls, Ethical Work Climates, and Organizational Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 505-528, March.
    7. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    8. Suning Zhu & Ashish Gupta & David Paradice & Casey Cegielski, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Immersion and Authenticity on Satisfaction Behavior in Learning Analytics Tasks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 791-814, August.
    9. Andreas Strobl & Jessica Niedermair & Kurt Matzler & Tobias Mussner, 2019. "Triggering Subordinate Innovation Behavior: The Influence Of Leaders’ Dark Personality Traits And Level 5 Leadership Behavior," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-37, June.
    10. Waseem Ul Hameed & Muhammad Haseeb & Jawad Iqbal & Leonardus W. W. Mihardjo & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2022. "Environmental disaster and women self‐sustainability—A survey study on microfinance female clientele in Pakistan," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3599-3622, July.
    11. Abdullah Hamoud Ali Seraj & Syed Ali Fazal & Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Competency, Financial Literacy, and Sustainable Performance—Examining the Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Resilience among Saudi Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Chung-Ho Su, 2018. "Exploring Sustainability Environment Educational Design and Learning Effect Evaluation through Migration Theory: An Example of Environment Educational Serious Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Jinhwan Kim & Hyeob Kim & HyukJun Kwon, 2020. "The Impact of Employees’ Perceptions of Strategic Alignment on Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Tobias Roeth & Patrick Spieth & Verena Joachim, 2019. "The Interaction Of Intuition And Rationality During Escalated Npd Decisions: An Investigation Of Decision-Makers’ Affective States," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-31, June.
    15. Nitzl, Christian, 2016. "The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 19-35.
    16. Linder, Christian, 2019. "Customer orientation and operations: The role of manufacturing capabilities in small- and medium-sized enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 105-117.
    17. Han, Jeong Hugh & Wang, Yingli & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Reconceptualization of information technology flexibility for supply chain management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 196-215.
    18. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong, 2021. "Drivers and Inhibitors of Internet Privacy Concern: A Multidimensional Development Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 539-564, January.
    19. Ralf Bebenroth & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2015. "When Organizational Justice Matters for Affective Merger Commitment," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-22, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    20. Daan Kabel & Mattias Elg & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Purchasing Behaviour of Remanufactured Robotic Lawn Mowers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.