IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s2_79-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Influence of Project Management Maturity on Projects’ Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Seweryn Spalek

    (Silesian University of Technology, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the link between reaching a certain level of Project Management Maturity by the company and its projects cost performance. Design/methodology/approach: The world-wide study was conducted in order to measure the influence of the Project Management Maturity level on the cost of projects. The survey was questionnaire based. As a result 194 cases were analyzed. Findings: We found that an increasing level of maturity in Project Management can have an influence on the reduction of costs of projects managed by the company. However, the strength of this influence depends on various factors which are discussed in the paper. Research limitations/implications: Research limitations are mostly connected with a limited range of industries available. Thus, limited representation led to a restricted cross-comparative study. Practical implications: Companies assess their maturity levels in Project Management. The findings of this paper demonstrate to them the potential benefits they can gain by increasing their maturity level. Originality/value: There is a limited number of world-wide studies on Project Management Maturity in companies. Moreover, the studies examining the influence of a certain maturity level on projects’ key performance indicators are limited to single case studies. Therefore, the paper fills an important gap of knowledge in that area.

Suggested Citation

  • Seweryn Spalek, 2013. "Influence of Project Management Maturity on Projects’ Costs," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s2_79-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S2_79-85.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pekka Tervonen & Joonas Alapiha & Harri Haapasalo, 2009. "Benchmarking ESSQ management system through tailored maturity model," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 262-280.
    2. Jörg Becker & Ralf Knackstedt & Jens Pöppelbuß, 2009. "Developing Maturity Models for IT Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(3), pages 213-222, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helena Holter Antonsen & Dag Øivind Madsen, 2021. "Developing a Maturity Model for the Compliance Function of Investment Firms: A Preliminary Case Study from Norway," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Frederik Marx & Felix Wortmann & Jörg Mayer, 2012. "A Maturity Model for Management Control Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(4), pages 193-207, August.
    3. Steven DeSimone & Giuseppe D’Onza & Gerrit Sarens, 2019. "Correlates of Internal Audit Function Maturity," Working Papers 1905, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    4. Mihaela Muntean & Ana-Ramona Bologa & Alexandra Maria Ioana Corbea & Razvan Bologa, 2019. "A Framework for Evaluating the Business Analytics Maturity of University Programmes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Yanhong Guo & Shuai Jiang & Wenjun Zhou & Chunyu Luo & Hui Xiong, 2021. "A predictive indicator using lender composition for loan evaluation in P2P lending," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Remco Dijkman & Sander Vincent Lammers & Ad Jong, 2016. "Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 717-734, August.
    7. T. Bartosz Kalinowski, 2012. "Evaluation of the implementation of process management in the surveyed enterprises (Ocena stopnia wdrozenia zarzadzania procesowego w badanych przedsiebiorstwach)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(37), pages 43-57.
    8. Elibal, Kerem & Özceylan, Eren, 2022. "Comparing industry 4.0 maturity models in the perspective of TQM principles using Fuzzy MCDM methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Peetu Virkkala & Martti Saarela & Kai Hänninen & Jaakko Kujala & Anna-Mari Simunaniemi, 2020. "Business Maturity Models for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 15(2), pages 137-155.
    10. Katarzyna Ragin-Skorecka & Daria Motala & Hubert Wojciechowski, 2021. "Auxiliary Management Methods Supporting Process Maturity: Has the Pandemic Changed Anything?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 811-821.
    11. Labaka, Leire & Maraña, Patricia & Giménez, Raquel & Hernantes, Josune, 2019. "Defining the roadmap towards city resilience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 281-296.
    12. Szumowski Witold & Cyfert Szymon, 2018. "A Model for evaluating strategic maturity of the local government," Management, Sciendo, vol. 22(2), pages 7-24, December.
    13. Eduard Eisner & Cadence Hsien & Mark Mennenga & Zi-Yu Khoo & Jasmin Dönmez & Christoph Herrmann & Jonathan Sze Choong Low, 2022. "Self-Assessment Framework for Corporate Environmental Sustainability in the Era of Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Alexander Poth & Mario Kottke & Andreas Riel, 2023. "Self-service kits to scale knowledge to autonomous teams - concept, application and limitations," Post-Print hal-04188951, HAL.
    15. Miguel Manjon & Zineb Aouni & Nathalie Crutzen, 2022. "Green and digital entrepreneurship in smart cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(2), pages 429-462, April.
    16. Meltem Özturan & Meltem Mutlutürk & Burç Çeken & Burçin Sarı, 2019. "Evaluating the information systems integration maturity level of travel agencies," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 237-257, June.
    17. Bernd Carsten Stahl & Michael Obach & Emad Yaghmaei & Veikko Ikonen & Kate Chatfield & Alexander Brem, 2017. "The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Carvalho, João Vidal & Rocha, Álvaro & Vasconcelos, José & Abreu, António, 2019. "A health data analytics maturity model for hospitals information systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 278-285.
    19. Katharina Stelzl & Maximilian Röglinger & Katrin Wyrtki, 2020. "Building an ambidextrous organization: a maturity model for organizational ambidexterity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1203-1230, November.
    20. Daniela Patricia Feversani & Valeria De Castro & Esperanza Marcos & Mario G. Piattini & María Luz Martín-Peña, 2023. "Towards a lightweight framework for service management evaluation in SMEs," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 81-122, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s2_79-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.