IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5221-d866299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Crnjac Zizic

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, Rudera Boskovica 32, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Marko Mladineo

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, Rudera Boskovica 32, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Nikola Gjeldum

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, Rudera Boskovica 32, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Luka Celent

    (School of Mechanical and Design Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK)

Abstract

The industry is a key driver of economic development. However, changes caused by introduction of modern technologies, and increasing complexity of products and production, directly affect the industrial enterprises and workers. The critics of the Industry 4.0 paradigm emphasized its orientation to new technologies and digitalization in a technocratic way. Therefore, the new industrial paradigm Industry 5.0 appeared very soon and automatically triggered a debate about the role of, and reasons for applying, the new paradigm. Industry 5.0 is complementing the existing Industry 4.0 paradigm with the orientation to the worker who has an important role in the production process, and that role has been emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this research, there is a brief discussion on main drivers and enablers for introduction of these new paradigms, then a literature-based analysis is carried out to highlight the differences between two paradigms from three important aspects—people, organization, and technology. The conclusion emphasizes the main features and concerns regarding the movement towards Industry 5.0, and the general conclusion is that there is a significant change of the main research aims from sustainability towards human-centricity. At the end, the analysis of maturity models that evaluates enterprises’ readiness to introduce features of new paradigms is given as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Crnjac Zizic & Marko Mladineo & Nikola Gjeldum & Luka Celent, 2022. "From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5221-:d:866299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    2. Andreas Felsberger & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Sustainable Industry 4.0 in Production and Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-39, September.
    3. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Personalization of Products in the Industry 4.0 Concept and Its Impact on Achieving a Higher Level of Sustainable Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Lia Tirabeni & Paola De Bernardi & Canio Forliano & Mattia Franco, 2019. "How Can Organisations and Business Models Lead to a More Sustainable Society? A Framework from a Systematic Review of the Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Muhammad Haseeb & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Beata Ślusarczyk & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A Solution towards Technology Challenges of Sustainable Business Performance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Andre Dionisio Rocha & Nelson Freitas & Duarte Alemão & Magno Guedes & Renato Martins & José Barata, 2021. "Event-Driven Interoperable Manufacturing Ecosystem for Energy Consumption Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Jörg Becker & Ralf Knackstedt & Jens Pöppelbuß, 2009. "Developing Maturity Models for IT Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(3), pages 213-222, June.
    8. Vinit Parida & David Sjödin & Wiebke Reim, 2019. "Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry: Past Achievements and Future Promises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Margherita, Emanuele Gabriel & Braccini, Alessio Maria, 2021. "Managing industry 4.0 automation for fair ethical business development: A single case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2020. "The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Martin Prause, 2019. "Challenges of Industry 4.0 Technology Adoption for SMEs: The Case of Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Xiang T. R. Kong & Hao Luo & George Q. Huang & Xuan Yang, 2019. "Industrial wearable system: the human-centric empowering technology in Industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2853-2869, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leon, Ramona Diana, 2023. "Employees’ reskilling and upskilling for industry 5.0: Selecting the best professional development programmes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Eliza Nichifor & Gabriel Brătucu, 2023. "Shaping the Inclusivity in the New Society by Enhancing the Digitainability of Sustainable Development Goals with Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Sergey Zhironkin & Elena Dotsenko, 2023. "Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-35, August.
    4. Amjad Almusaed & Ibrahim Yitmen & Asaad Almssad, 2023. "Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercedes Grijalvo Martín & Antonia Pacios Álvarez & Joaquín Ordieres-Meré & Javier Villalba-Díez & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2020. "New Business Models from Prescriptive Maintenance Strategies Aligned with Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Wiebke Reim & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2021. "Circular business model implementation: A capability development case study from the manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2745-2757, September.
    3. Broccardo, Laura & Zicari, Adrián & Jabeen, Fauzia & Bhatti, Zeeshan A., 2023. "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Linus Thomson & Anmar Kamalaldin & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2022. "A maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms: The interplay of technology, ecosystem, and business model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-152, March.
    5. Bencsik, Barbara & Palmié, Maximilian & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim & Gassmann, Oliver, 2023. "Business models for digital sustainability: Framework, microfoundations of value capture, and empirical evidence from 130 smart city services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Doroteja Vidmar & Marjeta Marolt & Andreja Pucihar, 2021. "Information Technology for Business Sustainability: A Literature Review with Automated Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Yi Liang & Chenyu Zhao & Min-Jae Lee, 2023. "Institutional Pressures on Sustainability and Green Performance: The Mediating Role of Digital Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Rosita Capurro & Raffaele Fiorentino & Rubina Michela Galeotti & Stefano Garzella, 2023. "The Impact of Digitalization and Sustainability on Governance Structures and Corporate Communication: A Cross-Industry and Cross-Country Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Xiao Li & Jiarou Cao & Zhenggang Liu & Xinggang Luo, 2020. "Sustainable Business Model Based on Digital Twin Platform Network: The Inspiration from Haier’s Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Lena Ries & Markus Beckmann & Peter Wehnert, 2023. "Sustainable smart product-service systems: a causal logic framework for impact design," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 667-706, May.
    11. James, Ajith Tom & Kumar, Girish & Tayal, Pushpal & Chauhan, Ashwin & Wadhawa, Chirag & Panchal, Jasmin, 2022. "Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Juliana Kurek & Luciana Londero Brandli & Marcos Antonio Leite Frandoloso & Amanda Lange Salvia & Janaina Mazutti, 2023. "Sustainable Business Models Innovation and Design Thinking: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Fernando E. García-Muiña & María Sonia Medina-Salgado & Anna Maria Ferrari & Marco Cucchi, 2020. "Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Cumali Kılıç & Gaye Atilla, 2024. "Industry 4.0 and sustainable business models: An intercontinental sample," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3142-3166, May.
    15. Viktorija Badasjane & Anna Granlund & Mats Ahlskog & Jessica Bruch, 2022. "Coordination of Digital Transformation in International Manufacturing Networks—Challenges and Coping Mechanisms from an Organizational Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Evers, Natasha & Ojala, Arto & Sousa, Carlos M.P. & Criado-Rialp, Alex, 2023. "Unraveling business model innovation in firm internationalization: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Paiola, Marco & Schiavone, Francesco & Grandinetti, Roberto & Chen, Junsong, 2021. "Digital servitization and sustainability through networking: Some evidences from IoT-based business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 507-516.
    18. Sascha Fuerst & Odille Sanchez-Dominguez & Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Montes, 2023. "The Role of Digital Technology within the Business Model of Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Regina Diaz & Raul Montalvo, 2022. "Digital Transformation as an Enabler to Become More Efficient in Sustainability: Evidence from Five Leading Companies in the Mexican Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Cinzia Battistella & Maria Rosita Cagnina & Lucia Cicero & Nadia Preghenella, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models of SMEs: Challenges in Yacht Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5221-:d:866299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.