IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pha1450.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Jan Hausfeld

Personal Details

First Name:Jan
Middle Name:
Last Name:Hausfeld
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pha1450
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Centre for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision-Making (CREED)
Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde
Universiteit van Amsterdam

Amsterdam, Netherlands
http://www.creedexperiment.nl/creed/
RePEc:edi:ceuvanl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Regina Anselm & Deepti Bhatia & Urs Fischbacher & Jan Hausfeld, 2022. "Blame and Praise: Responsibility Attribution Patterns in Decision Chains," TWI Research Paper Series 126, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
  2. Urs Fischbacher & David Grammling & Jan Hausfeld, 2021. "Redistribution beyond equality and status quo - heterogeneous societies in the lab," TWI Research Paper Series 123, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
  3. Baiba Renerte & Jan Hausfeld & Torsten Twardawski, 2020. "Gender, overconfidence, and optimal group composition for investment decisions," TWI Research Paper Series 121, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
  4. Urs Fischbacher & Jan Hausfeld & Baiba Renerte, 2020. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," TWI Research Paper Series 120, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
  5. Jan Hausfeld & Konstantin Hesler & Susanne Goldlücke, 2018. "Strategic Gaze: An Interactive Eye-Tracking Study," TWI Research Paper Series 114, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
  6. Jan Hausfeld & Sven Resnjanskij, 2018. "Risky Decisions and the Opportunity Cost of Time," ifo Working Paper Series 269, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

Articles

  1. Deepti Bhatia & Urs Fischbacher & Jan Hausfeld & Regina Stumpf, 2024. "Blame and praise: responsibility attribution patterns in decision chains," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(3), pages 637-663, July.
  2. Fischbacher, Urs & Grammling, David & Hausfeld, Jan & Zíka, Vojtěch, 2023. "Identity breeds inequality: Evidence from a laboratory experiment on redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
  3. Blair R. K. Shevlin & Stephanie M. Smith & Jan Hausfeld & Ian Krajbich, 2022. "High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(6), pages 2101508119-, February.
  4. Blair R. K. Shevlin & Stephanie M. Smith & Jan Hausfeld & Ian Krajbich, 2022. "Reply to Pirrone and Tsetsos: Robust evidence for enhanced high-value sensitivity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(36), pages 2209521119-, September.
  5. Fischbacher, Urs & Hausfeld, Jan & Renerte, Baiba, 2022. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-91.
  6. J. Hausfeld & K. von Hesler & S. Goldlücke, 2021. "Strategic gaze: an interactive eye-tracking study," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 177-205, March.
  7. Hausfeld, Jan & Fischbacher, Urs & Knoch, Daria, 2020. "The value of decision-making power in social decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 898-912.
  8. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Jan Hausfeld & Konstantin Hesler & Susanne Goldlücke, 2018. "Strategic Gaze: An Interactive Eye-Tracking Study," TWI Research Paper Series 114, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.

    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Alexander Ritschel, 2022. "Attention and salience in preference reversals," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 1024-1051, June.
    2. Fischbacher, Urs & Hausfeld, Jan & Renerte, Baiba, 2022. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-91.

  2. Jan Hausfeld & Sven Resnjanskij, 2018. "Risky Decisions and the Opportunity Cost of Time," ifo Working Paper Series 269, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    Cited by:

    1. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

Articles

  1. Fischbacher, Urs & Grammling, David & Hausfeld, Jan & Zíka, Vojtěch, 2023. "Identity breeds inequality: Evidence from a laboratory experiment on redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Drouvelis, Michalis & Gomez-Martinez, Francisco, 2023. "The impact of group identity on experimental markets with externalities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Margot Belguise & Yuchen Huang & Zhexun Mo, 2024. "Non-meritocrats or choice-reluctant meritocrats? A redistribution experiment in China and France," Discussion Papers 2024-05, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    3. Belguise, Margot & Huang, Yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2023. "Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1476, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    4. Belguise, Margot & Huang, Yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2023. "Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2308, CEPREMAP.

  2. Blair R. K. Shevlin & Stephanie M. Smith & Jan Hausfeld & Ian Krajbich, 2022. "High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(6), pages 2101508119-, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Mondal, Supratik & Traczyk, Jakub, 2023. "Conditionality of adaptiveness: Investigating the relationship between numeracy and adaptive behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Sean, Duffy & John, Smith, 2023. "Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise?," MPRA Paper 116382, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  3. J. Hausfeld & K. von Hesler & S. Goldlücke, 2021. "Strategic gaze: an interactive eye-tracking study," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 177-205, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Hausfeld, Jan & Fischbacher, Urs & Knoch, Daria, 2020. "The value of decision-making power in social decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 898-912.

    Cited by:

    1. Regina Anselm & Deepti Bhatia & Urs Fischbacher & Jan Hausfeld, 2022. "Blame and Praise: Responsibility Attribution Patterns in Decision Chains," TWI Research Paper Series 126, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    2. Sookie Xue Zhang & Ralph-Christopher Bayer, 2023. "Delegation based on cheap talk," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 333-361, February.
    3. Fischbacher, Urs & Hausfeld, Jan & Renerte, Baiba, 2022. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-91.

  5. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Werner Güth & Paolo Crosetto, 2021. "What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game," Post-Print hal-03722234, HAL.
    2. Segovia, Michelle & Palma, Marco & Lusk, Jayson L. & Drichoutis, Andreas, 2022. "Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?," MPRA Paper 115572, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ayşegül Engin, 2021. "The cognitive ability and working memory framework: Interpreting cognitive reflection test results in the domain of the cognitive experiential theory," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 227-245, March.
    4. Minciu Mihaela & Berar Florin-Aurel & Dobrea Razvan Catalin, 2020. "New decision systems in the VUCA world," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 236-254, June.
    5. Fischbacher, Urs & Hausfeld, Jan & Renerte, Baiba, 2022. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-91.
    6. Amasino, Dianna R. & Dolgin, Jack & Huettel, Scott A., 2023. "Eyes on the account size: Interactions between attention and budget in consumer choice," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Rogge, Nicky, 2021. "When the cost has sunk: Measuring and comparing the sunk-cost bias in autistic and neurotypical persons," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Biroli, Pietro & Bosworth, Steven J. & Della Giusta, Marina & Di Girolamo, Amalia & Jaworska, Sylvia & Vollen, Jeremy, 2020. "Framing the Predicted Impacts of COVID-19 Prophylactic Measures in Terms of Lives Saved Rather Than Deaths Is More Effective for Older People," IZA Discussion Papers 13753, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 6 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (6) 2018-02-19 2018-11-26 2019-03-25 2020-10-12 2021-01-04 2022-03-21. Author is listed
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (2) 2018-11-26 2021-01-04. Author is listed
  3. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (2) 2018-02-19 2018-11-26. Author is listed
  4. NEP-BAN: Banking (1) 2022-03-21
  5. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2022-03-21
  6. NEP-GEN: Gender (1) 2021-01-04
  7. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2019-03-25
  8. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (1) 2022-03-21

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Jan Hausfeld should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.