IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/per199.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Hande Erkut

Personal Details

First Name:Hande
Middle Name:
Last Name:Erkut
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:per199
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.wzb.eu/
RePEc:edi:wzbbbde (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Georgia Michailidou & Hande Erkut, 2022. "Lie O'Clock: Experimental Evidence on Intertemporal Lying Preferences," Working Papers 20220076, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Apr 2022.
  2. Erkut, Hande & Shalvi, Shaul, 2019. "Working until you drop: Image concerns or prosocial motives?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2019-214, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  3. Erkut, Hande, 2018. "Social norms and preferences for generosity are domain dependent," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2018-207, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  4. Hande Erkut & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2014. "Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Spectators vs. Stakeholders," Discussion Papers 2014-16, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.

Articles

  1. Erkut, Hande, 2022. "Social norms and preferences for generosity are domain dependent," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 121-140.
  2. Erkut, Hande & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2015. "Identifying social norms using coordination games: Spectators vs. stakeholders," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 28-31.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Erkut, Hande, 2018. "Social norms and preferences for generosity are domain dependent," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2018-207, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Armenak Antinyan & Luca Corazzini & Miloš Fišar & Tommaso Reggiani, 2022. "Mind the framing when studying social preferences in the domain of losses," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2022-11, Masaryk University, revised Feb 2023.
    2. Thunström, Linda, 2019. "Preferences for fairness over losses," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Cochard, François & Flage, Alexandre, 2024. "Sharing losses in dictator and ultimatum games: A meta-analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. François Cochard & Alexandre Flage, 2023. "Sharing Losses in Dictator and Ultimatum Games: A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers 2023-09, CRESE.
    5. Kübler, Dorothea & Erkut, Hande, 2022. "Repugnant Transactions: The Role of Agency and Extreme Consequences," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264052, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  2. Hande Erkut & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2014. "Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Spectators vs. Stakeholders," Discussion Papers 2014-16, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.

    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Fallucchi & Daniele Nosenzo, 2020. "The Coordinating Power of Social Norms," Discussion Papers 2020-14, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    2. Abigail Barr & Tom Lane & Daniele Nosenzo, 2017. "On the social inappropriateness of discrimination," Discussion Papers 2017-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    3. Giuseppe Attanasi & Claire Rimbaud & Marie Claire Villeval, 2019. "Embezzlement and guilt aversion," Post-Print halshs-02073561, HAL.
    4. Christian König-Kersting, 2024. "On the robustness of social norm elicitation," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 531-543, December.
    5. Kandul, Serhiy & Lanz, Bruno, 2021. "Public good provision, in-group cooperation and out-group descriptive norms: A lab experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Daniele Nosenzo & Erte Xiao & Nina Xue, 2022. "Norm-signalling punishment," Monash Economics Working Papers 2022-26, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    7. Bogliacino, Francesco & Aycinena, Diego & Kimbrough, Erik, 2024. "Measuring Norms: Assessing the threat of Social Desirability Bias to the Bicchieri and Xiao elicitation method," SocArXiv 7n4xd, Center for Open Science.
    8. Simon Gaechter & Leonie Gerhards & Daniele Nosenzo, 2015. "The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing," Discussion Papers 2015-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    9. Apffelstaedt, Arno & Freundt, Jana & Oslislo, Christoph, 2022. "Social norms and elections: How elected rules can make behavior (in)appropriate," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 148-177.
    10. Giovanna D'Adda & Michalis Drouvelis & Daniele Nosenzo, 2015. "Norm Elicitation in Within-Subject Designs: Testing for Order Effects," Discussion Papers 2015-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    11. Heinicke, Franziska & König-Kersting, Christian & Schmidt, Robert, 2022. "Injunctive vs. descriptive social norms and reference group dependence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 199-218.
    12. Sandra Polania-Reyes, 2016. "Disentangling Social Capital: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence on Coordination, Networks, and Cooperation," Artefactual Field Experiments 00565, The Field Experiments Website.
    13. Rößler, Christoph & Rusch, Hannes & Friehe, Tim, 2019. "Do norms make preferences social? Supporting evidence from the field," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203532, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Schippers, Anouk L. & Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2024. "Sharing with minimal regulation? Evidence from neighborhood book exchange," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Zahra Murad & Charitini Stavropoulou & Graham Cookson, 2019. "Incentives and gender in a multi-task setting: An experimental study with real-effort tasks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Ciril Bosch-Rosa, 2018. "Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Hanna Fromell & Daniele Nosenzo & Trudy Owens & Fabio Tufano, 2019. "Are Victims Truly Worse Off in the Presence of Bystanders? Revisiting the Bystander Effect," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 70(6), pages 927-943.
    18. Daniele Nosenzo & Erte Xiao & Nina Xue, 2024. "The motive matters: Experimental evidence on the expressive function of punishment," Monash Economics Working Papers 2024-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    19. Serdarevic, Nina, 2021. "Licence to lie and the social (In)appropriateness of lying," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Erik O. Kimbrough & Erin L. Krupka & Rajnish Kumar & Jennifer M. Murray & Abhijit Ramalingam & Sharon Sánchez-Franco & Olga L. Sarmiento & Frank Kee & Ruth F. Hunter, 2024. "On the stability of norms and norm-following propensity: a cross-cultural panel study with adolescents," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(2), pages 351-378, April.
    21. Francesca Barigozzi & Natalia Montinari, 2023. "From Personal Values to Social Norms," Working Papers wp1182, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    22. Guerra, Alice & Zhuravleva, Tatyana, 2021. "Do bystanders react to bribery?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 442-462.
    23. te Velde, Vera L., 2022. "Heterogeneous norms: Social image and social pressure when people disagree," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 319-340.
    24. Francesca Barigozzi & Caterina Gaggini & Natalia Montinari, 2024. "Gender equality norms across generations: Evidence from a representative sample," Working Papers wp1198, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    25. Chang, Daphne & Chen, Roy & Krupka, Erin, 2019. "Rhetoric matters: A social norms explanation for the anomaly of framing," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 158-178.
    26. Hoffmann, Robert & Blijlevens, Janneke & Chuah, Swee-Hoon & Neelim, Ananta & Peryman, Joanne & Skali, Ahmed, 2020. "The ethics of student participation in economic experiments: Arguments and evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    27. Catherine C. Eckel & Hanna G. Hoover & Erin L. Krupka & Nishita Sinha & Rick K. Wilson, 2023. "Using social norms to explain giving behavior," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1115-1141, November.
    28. Kimbrough, Erik O. & Vostroknutov, Alexander, 2018. "A portable method of eliciting respect for social norms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 147-150.
    29. Christian König-Kersting, 2021. "On the Robustness of Social Norm Elicitation," Working Papers 2021-02, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.

Articles

  1. Erkut, Hande, 2022. "Social norms and preferences for generosity are domain dependent," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 121-140.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Erkut, Hande & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2015. "Identifying social norms using coordination games: Spectators vs. stakeholders," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 28-31.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 4 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (4) 2015-01-03 2019-01-07 2019-11-25 2022-04-18
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (2) 2019-01-07 2022-04-18
  3. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2015-01-03
  4. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (1) 2019-11-25
  5. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2019-11-25
  6. NEP-LMA: Labor Markets - Supply, Demand, and Wages (1) 2019-11-25
  7. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (1) 2022-04-18
  8. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (1) 2015-01-03
  9. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (1) 2022-04-18

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Hande Erkut should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.