IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/mpifgs/9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations

Editor

Listed:
  • Marin, Bernd
  • Mayntz, Renate

Abstract

Political governance in modern societies can no longer be conceived in terms of external government control of society but emerges from a plurality of governing agents. In contemporary policy making, governmental and non-governmental actors are interconnected in complex networks of interaction, exchanging information and other resources. This reader presents the results of empirical network studies in a variety of policy sectors and in different countries. It also provides insights into innovative quantitative and qualitative approaches to network analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Marin, Bernd & Mayntz, Renate (ed.), 1991. "Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 9, number 9.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209601/1/mpifg-bd-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eccles, Robert G., 1981. "The quasifirm in the construction industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 335-357, December.
    2. Rosewitz, Bernd & Webber, Douglas, 1990. "Reformversuche und Reformblockaden im deutschen Gesundheitswesen," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 5, number 5.
    3. Brigitte Unger & Franz Traxler, 1990. "Institutionelle Erfolgsbedingungen wirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels. Zum Verhältnis von Effizienz und Regulierung aus theoretischer und empirischer Sicht," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 16(2), pages 189-224.
    4. Hollingsworth, J. Rogers, 1990. "The Governance of American Manufacturing Sectors: The Logic of Coordination and Control," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Schneider, Volker, 1989. "Technikentwicklung zwischen Politik und Markt: Der Fall Bildschirmtext," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 4, number 4.
    6. Hohn, Hans-Willy & Schimank, Uwe, 1990. "Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem: Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 7, number 7.
    7. Werle, Raymund, 1990. "Telekommunikation in der Bundesrepublik: Expansion, Differenzierung, Transformation," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 6, number 6.
    8. Franz Traxler & Brigitte Unger, 1990. "Institutionelle Erfolgsbedingungen wirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 16(2), pages 189-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ninin GUSDINI & M.Yanuar J PURWANTO & Kukuh MURTILAKSONO & KHOLIL, 2017. "Water Governance Model In Small City: Review At Distric Bekasi - Indonesia," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 38-52, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schimank, Uwe & Stucke, Andreas (ed.), 1994. "Coping with Trouble: How Science Reacts to Political Disturbances of Research Conditions," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 14, number 14.
    2. Mayntz, Renate, 1991. "Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Gil, Ricard & Marion, Justin, 2009. "The Role of Repeated Interactions, Self-Enforcing Agreements and Relational [Sub]Contracting: Evidence from California Highway Procurement Auctions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6ds5d1pp, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Wasem, Jurgen, 1997. "A study on decentralizing from acute care to home care settings in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(Supplemen), pages 109-129, September.
    5. Anthony J. Daboub & Jerry M. Calton, 2002. "Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 85-98, November.
    6. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    7. Dorothea Jansen & Regina Görtz & Richard Heidler, 2010. "Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 219-241, April.
    8. Shalini R. Tiwari & Rajen Gupta, 2012. "Dynamics of Knowledge Integration in a Project Network," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 11(2), pages 143-169, December.
    9. Mark Lehrer, 2007. "Organizing knowledge spillovers when basic and applied research are interdependent: German biotechnology policy in historical perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 277-296, June.
    10. Simon Deakin & David Gindis & Geoffrey M. Hodgson & Kainan Huang & Katharina Pistor, 2015. "Legal Institutionalism: Capitalism & the Constitutive Role of Law," Working Papers wp468, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    11. Bernard Baudry & Virgile Chassagnon, 2012. "The vertical network organization as a specific governance structure: what are the challenges for incomplete contracts theories and what are the theoretical implications for the boundaries of the (hub," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(2), pages 285-303, May.
    12. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Marie Ferru & Marie-Pierre Renée Bes & Michel Grossetti, 2011. "Measuring social proximity in the geography of innovation," Post-Print halshs-01395667, HAL.
    14. Bucheli, Marcelo & Mahoney, Joseph T. & Vaaler, Paul M., 2007. "Chandler's Living History: The Visible Hand of Vertical Integration in 19th Century America Viewed under a 21st Century Transaction Costs Economics Lens," Working Papers 07-0111, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    15. Chen-Yu Chang, 2006. "The determinants of the vertical boundaries of the construction firm: comment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 229-232.
    16. Marco Furlotti & Giuseppe Soda, 2018. "Fit for the Task: Complementarity, Asymmetry, and Partner Selection in Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 837-854, October.
    17. W. Coles, Jerilyn & Hesterly, William S., 1998. "The impact of firm-specific assets and the interaction of uncertainty: an examination of make or buy decisions in public and private hospitals," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 383-409, August.
    18. Krzakiewicz Kazimierz & Cyfert Szymon, 2013. "The Network Concept of Strategic Management and Its Limitations / Sieciowa koncepcja zarządzania strategicznego i jej ograniczenia," Management, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 19-30, May.
    19. Fritz W. Scharpf, 1991. "Response to Steven J. Brams and Bruno S. Frey," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(2), pages 261-265, April.
    20. Frayret, Jean-Marc & D&rsquo & Amours, Sophie & Montreuil, Benoit & Cloutier, Louis, 2001. "A network approach to operate agile manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 239-259, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.