IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/391.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Partizipation von CrowdworkerInnen auf Crowdsourcing-Plattformen: Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick

Author

Listed:
  • Gegenhuber, Thomas
  • Ellmer, Markus
  • Scheba, Claudia

Abstract

Wie organisieren Crowdwork-Plattformen die Partizipation von CrowdworkerInnen in arbeits- und unternehmensbezogenen Themen? Diese Studie untersucht sechs Plattformen im Hinblick auf die Modi der Partizipation (informieren, melden, diskutieren und abstimmen) und die Inhalte (auf die Aufgabe bezogen, die Arbeitsorganisation oder die Unternehmensstrategie). Partizipation ist auf Plattformen zwar möglich, aber sie ist ausbaufähig. Dazu stellt diese Studie Beispiele guter Praxis vor, diskutiert Partizipationshürden und bringt Vorschläge für "neue" Partizipationsinstrumente auf Plattformen.

Suggested Citation

  • Gegenhuber, Thomas & Ellmer, Markus & Scheba, Claudia, 2018. "Partizipation von CrowdworkerInnen auf Crowdsourcing-Plattformen: Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 391, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/180404/1/1026957664.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stone,Katherine V. W., 2004. "From Widgets to Digits," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521829106, October.
    2. Stone,Katherine V. W., 2004. "From Widgets to Digits," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521535991, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keller, Berndt, 2020. "Interest representation and industrial relations in the age of digitalization ‒ an outline [Interessenvertretung und Arbeitsbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung - ein Überblick]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(3), pages 255-285.
    2. Kirchner, Stefan & Matiaske, Wenzel, 2020. "Plattformökonomie und Arbeitsbeziehungen ‒ Digitalisierung zwischen imaginierter Zukunft und empirischer Gegenwart," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(2), pages 105-119.
    3. Greef, Samuel & Schroeder, Wolfgang & Sperling, Hans Joachim, 2020. "Plattformökonomie und Crowdworking als Herausforderungen für das deutsche Modell der Arbeitsbeziehungen [Platform Economy and Crowdworking as Challenges for the German Model of Industrial Relatio," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(2), pages 205-226.
    4. Katarzyna Gruszka & Manuel Scholz-Wäckerle & Ernest Aigner, 2020. "Planetary carambolage: The evolutionary political economy of technology, nature and work," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 273-293, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dale Dannefer & Jielu Lin & George Gonos, 2021. "Age‐Differentiated vs. Age‐Integrated: Neoliberal Policy and the Future of the Life Course," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 59-82, March.
    2. Mordehai Mironi, 2010. "Reframing the Representation Debate: Going beyond Union and Non-Union Options," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(3), pages 367-383, April.
    3. Virgile Chassagnon & Bernard Baudry, 2016. "American versus French labor and employment law : a critical review of the analysis of employment relationship in contract economic theories," Working Papers halshs-01371870, HAL.
    4. De Stefano, Valerio., 2016. "The rise of the "just-in-time workforce" : on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy"," ILO Working Papers 994899823402676, International Labour Organization.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:403814 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Fenwick, Colin F. & Howe, John & Marshall, Shelley. & Landau, Ingrid, 2007. "Labour and labour-related laws in micro and small enterprises : innovative regulatory approaches," ILO Working Papers 994038143402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Roth, Steffen & Dahms, Harry F. & Welz, Frank & Cattacin, Sandro, 2019. "Print theories of computer societies. Introduction to the digital transformation of social theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Michael Dobbie & Craig MacMillan, 2010. "Internal Labour Markets in Australia: Evidence from the Survey of Education and Training Experience," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 13(2), pages 137-154.
    9. James S. Bowman & Jonathan P. West, 2007. "Lord Acton and Employment Doctrines: Absolute Power and the Spread of At-Will Employment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 119-130, August.
    10. Guy MUNDLAK, 2007. "The right to work: Linking human rights and employment policy," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 146(3-4), pages 189-215, September.
    11. Michael Quinlan, 2012. "The ‘Pre-Invention’ of Precarious Employment: The Changing World of Work in Context," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 23(4), pages 3-24, November.
    12. Shae McCrystal, 2008. "Re-imagining the Role of Trade Unions after WorkChoices," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 18(2), pages 63-70, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.