IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfi/wfbook/40865.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Annual performance assessment of Suchana nutrition sensitive fish and vegetable production in Sylhet and Moulvibazar

Author

Listed:
  • Baten, Md. A.
  • Sarker, A.K.
  • Dickson, M.W.
  • Thilsted, S.H.
  • Byrd, K.A.

Abstract

WorldFish is promoting nutrition-sensitive fish and vegetable production systems for beneficiary households in north-east Bangladesh as part of the ‘Suchana’ consortium led by Save the Children and other consortium partners; HKI, IDE, icddr,b, CNRS, FIVDB and RDRS. The goal of the 6-year program is to reduce childhood stunting by additional 6% in 250,000 very poor households in Sylhet and Moulvibazar districts within first 3 years of interventions. It was anticipated that 30% of the beneficiary households would have access to ponds or other small water-bodies and they would receive support on nutrition-sensitive fish production along with other nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific program components. Nutrition-sensitive fish and vegetable production interventions focused mainly on carp and tilapia polyculture along with the production of small indigenous fish species along and different types of vegetables. The main aim of the interventions was to increase the production and consumption of fish and vegetables to enhance dietary diversity of women and young children (6-23 months). Before initiating large-scale implementation, a learning phase was implemented in 2016 targeting 14,714 beneficiary households (BHHs) from the 12 unions in Sylhet and Moulvibazar. During this period, WorldFish supported 6,610 beneficiary households (BHHs) and 103 demonstration ponds. All BHHs received nutrition sensitive horticulture related interventions, and 5,109 BHHs and 103 Demo Pond owners also received nutrition sensitive aquaculture support. There was strong adoption of the technologies with 90% of BHHs harvesting fish and 98% harvesting vegetables over the following year. More than 80% of the fish and 76% of vegetables were consumed by household members including women of reproductive age and young children. Participation of women in aquaculture and horticulture activities increased as well. In the BHHs, more than three-fifth of the women (59%) and two-third of the young children (64%) consumed diversified diets at the annual assessment and that was only 25% for the women and 20% at the formative research. These two findings weren’t directly comparable methodologically but still we may use as the reference points to get the ideas before starting the Suchana interventions. Moreover, fish was consumed on a regular basis by 91% of women compared to 51% of young children at the annual assessment indicating that more attention should be given to the promotion of feeding fish to young children. The major challenges expressed by BHHs were joint ownership of ponds, highly turbid water during rains, and lack of technical knowledge and experience while flooding and drought also affected vegetable production. Many subjects also wanted Suchana to provide better quality fish seed, continued training and technical support. While the project provided fish and vegetable seed along with other key inputs, it is important that these are made available at the right times of the year.

Suggested Citation

  • Baten, Md. A. & Sarker, A.K. & Dickson, M.W. & Thilsted, S.H. & Byrd, K.A., 2018. "Annual performance assessment of Suchana nutrition sensitive fish and vegetable production in Sylhet and Moulvibazar," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40865, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfi:wfbook:40865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/4209
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jahan, K.M. & Belton, B. & Ali, H. & Dhar, G.C. & Ara, I., 2015. "Aquaculture technologies in Bangladesh: An assessment of technical and economic performance and producer behavior," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40685, April.
    2. Toufique, Kazi Ali & Belton, Ben, 2014. "Is Aquaculture Pro-Poor? Empirical Evidence of Impacts on Fish Consumption in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 609-620.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Shannon Shisler & Marta Moratti & Cem Yavuz & Arnab Acharya & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2021. "Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thilsted, Shakuntala Haraksingh & Thorne-Lyman, Andrew & Webb, Patrick & Bogard, Jessica Rose & Subasinghe, Rohana & Phillips, Michael John & Allison, Edward Hugh, 2016. "Sustaining healthy diets: The role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 126-131.
    2. Belton, Ben & Hein, Aung & Htoo, Kyan & Kham, L. Seng & Nischan, Ulrike & Reardon, Thomas & Boughton, Duncan, 2015. "• Aquaculture in Transition: Value Chain Transformation, Fish and Food Security in Myanmar," Food Security International Development Working Papers 230981, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    3. Lipper, Leslie & Cavatassi, Romina & Symons, Ricci & Gordes, Alashiya & Page, Oliver, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 85: Financing climate adaptation and resilient agricultural livelihoods," IFAD Research Series 322020, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    4. Amelie Bernzen & Ellen Mangnus & Franziska Sohns, 2022. "Diversify, produce or buy? An analysis of factors contributing to household dietary diversity among shrimp and non-shrimp farmers in coastal Bangladesh," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 741-761, June.
    5. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Marta Moratti & Shannon Shisler & Birte Snilstveit & John Eyers, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    7. Cárdenas-Retamal, Roberto & Dresdner-Cid, Jorge & Ceballos-Concha, Adams, 2021. "Impact assessment of salmon farming on income distribution in remote coastal areas: The Chilean case," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Bassett, Hannah R. & Lau, Jacqueline & Giordano, Christopher & Suri, Sharon K. & Advani, Sahir & Sharan, Sonia, 2021. "Preliminary lessons from COVID-19 disruptions of small-scale fishery supply chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Gheorghe Adrian ZUGRAVU & Kamel Ibrahim KAMEL & Maria Magdalena TUREK RAHOVEANU & Marian Tiberiu COADA & Stefan Mihai PETREA & Alexandru Cristian BANDI & Mirela CRETU & Ira Adeline CHIHAIA, 2017. "Development Smart Water Aquaponics Model," Proceedings RCE 2017, Editura Lumen, vol. 0, pages 456-464, November.
    10. repec:lic:licosd:41419 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Xavier Tezzo & Simon R. Bush & Peter Oosterveer & Ben Belton, 2021. "Food system perspective on fisheries and aquaculture development in Asia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 73-90, February.
    12. Dasgupta, Susmita & Mustafa, Golam & Paul, Tapas & Wheeler, David, 2021. "The socioeconomics of fish consumption and child health: An observational cohort study from Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Assem Abu Hatab & Maria Eduarda Rigo Cavinato & Carl Johan Lagerkvist, 2019. "Urbanization, livestock systems and food security in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(2), pages 279-299, April.
    14. Toufique, K A, 2015. "Some Thoughts on Hilsa Exports and Management in Bangladesh," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 38(2), pages 115-127, June.
    15. Belton, B. & Ahmed, N. & Murshed-e-Jahan, K., 2014. "Aquaculture, employment, poverty, food security and well-being in Bangladesh: A comparative study," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40464, April.
    16. Steven Gronau & Etti Winter & Ulrike Grote, 2020. "Aquaculture, fish resources and rural livelihoods: a village CGE analysis from Namibia’s Zambezi Region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 615-642, February.
    17. Baten, Md A. & Sarker, A.K., 2020. "Rapid Assessment of subsistence fishing and poultry rearing along with horticulture among the household beneficiaries of Phase 3 of Suchana program in Sylhet and Moulvibazar," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40906, April.
    18. Oosting, Simon & van der Lee, Jan & Verdegem, Marc & de Vries, Marion & Vernooij, Adriaan & Bonilla-Cedrez, Camila & Kabir, Kazi, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 84: Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems," IFAD Research Series 322018, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    19. Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Shannon Shisler & Marta Moratti & Cem Yavuz & Arnab Acharya & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2021. "Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    20. Asche, Frank & Bellemare, Marc F. & Roheim, Cathy & Smith, Martin D. & Tveteras, Sigbjørn, 2015. "Fair Enough? Food Security and the International Trade of Seafood," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 151-160.
    21. Asche, Frank & Smith, Martin D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Induced Innovation in Fisheries and Aquaculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-7.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Small-scale aquaculture; technology; Food security; gender equity; Nutrition; food fish; Fish; vegetables; Bangladesh;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q00 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfi:wfbook:40865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: William Ko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wfishmy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.