IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/busexc/v12y2018i1p117-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Perception Of Corporate Social Responsibility In Bosnia And Herzegovina

Author

Listed:
  • Admir Čavalić

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Damir Bećirović

    (International Business-Information Academy Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

A company follows the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) when, in addition to its basic economic functions, it fulfills other functions to achieve greater social goals. Corporate social responsibility is an imperative in the modern world of business while in theory, it is still the subject of discussions. Nevertheless, within different theories, there is a certain consensus specifically related to the understanding of the importance of stakeholders and the existence of different levels of CSR. Th e main aim of this paper is to explore and analyze employee perceptions of CSR activities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This paper will present a survey of the perception of 100 corporate representatives related to CSR, with an analysis of the influence of sociodemographic factors and job characteristics on their attitudes. In addition, the paper offers the conclusion, with a number of recommendations for improving the current state of CSR in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Suggested Citation

  • Admir Čavalić & Damir Bećirović, 2018. "Employee Perception Of Corporate Social Responsibility In Bosnia And Herzegovina," Poslovna izvrsnost/Business Excellence, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 12(1), pages 117-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:117-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/301757
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood, Donna J., 1991. "Toward improving corporate social performance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 66-73.
    2. Abraham Carmeli & Gershon Gilat & David A. Waldman, 2007. "The Role of Perceived Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 972-992, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boban Melovic & Nikola Milovic & Tamara Backovic-Vulic & Branislav Dudic & Peter Bajzik, 2019. "Attitudes and Perceptions of Employees toward Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Balkan Countries: Importance and Relevance for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-37, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qinghua Zhu & Hang Yin & Junjun Liu & Kee‐hung Lai, 2014. "How is Employee Perception of Organizational Efforts in Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Their Satisfaction and Loyalty Towards Developing Harmonious Society in Chinese Enterprises?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 28-40, January.
    2. Yi Liu & Wenqian Li & Yuan Li, 2020. "Ambidexterity between low cost strategy and CSR strategy: contingencies of competition and regulation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 633-660, September.
    3. Timothy Gubler & Ian Larkin & Lamar Pierce, 2018. "Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 4967-4987, November.
    4. Yun-Seok Hwang & Byung-Jik Kim, 2021. "“The Power of a Firm’s Benevolent Act”: The Influence of Work Overload on Turnover Intention, the Mediating Role of Meaningfulness of Work and the Moderating Effect of CSR Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Jia Xu & Jiuchang Wei & Liangdong Lu, 2019. "Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1027-1044, September.
    6. Mehran Nejati & Azadeh Shafaei, 2023. "Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2066-2080, July.
    7. Geert Braam & Erik Poutsma & Roel Schouteten & Beatrice van der Heijden, 2024. "Employee financial participation and corporate social and environmental performance: Evidence from European panel data," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 381-409, June.
    8. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Oja, Brent D. & Bass, Jordan R. & Gordon, Brian S., 2015. "Conceptualizing employee identification with sport organizations: Sport Employee Identification (SEI)," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 583-595.
    10. Sushmita Srivastava, 2011. "A Study of the Impact of Types of Job Change on Perceived Performance of Newly Rotated Managers: The Mediating Role of Job Change Dimensions," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 36(1), pages 73-98, February.
    11. Rong-Tsu Wang, 2013. "Modeling Corporate Social Performance and Job Pursuit Intention: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Reputation and Job Advancement Prospects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 569-582, October.
    12. Ana Paula Pereira dos Passos & Jeferson Lana & Rosilene Marcon, 2023. "Social and political capabilities as nonmarket activities: What are they and how do firms develop them?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2718-2730, November.
    13. Kenneth Roeck & François Maon, 2018. "Building the Theoretical Puzzle of Employees’ Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 609-625, May.
    14. Chrisanty Victoria Layman & Sasmoko & Mohammad Hamsal & Lim Sanny, 2022. "A Portrait of Socially Responsible Hospitals in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-11, March.
    15. Vos, Janita F.J., 2002. "Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders," Research Report 02G52, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Stankevičiūtė Živilė & Wereda Wioletta, 2020. "Universalism values and organisational citizenship behaviour referring to employee perception of corporate social responsibility," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 302-325, June.
    17. Min-Jik Kim & Byung-Jik Kim, 2021. "The Performance Implication of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Role of Employee’s Prosocial Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Ait Sidhoum, Amer & Serra, Teresa, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and dimensions of performance: An application to U.S. electric utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Shuvabrata Saha, 2018. "Employee Perception Regarding Corporate Social Performance:A study of the selected Banking Company in Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 2(3), pages 419-431.
    20. Chiyem Lucky Nwanzu & Sunday Samson Babalola, 2019. "Predictive Relationship between Sustainable Organisational Practices and Organisational Effectiveness: The Mediating role of Organisational Identification and Organisation-Based Self-Esteem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:117-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dario Dunković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.