IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v40y2020i9p1863-1886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Soft‐Path Solution to Risk Reduction by Modeling Medical Waste Disposal Center Location‐Allocation Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Liming Yao
  • Zhongwen Xu
  • Ziqiang Zeng

Abstract

The risk of medical waste pollution and huge demand of daily medical waste disposal pose great difficulties to medical waste management. Establishing medical waste disposal centers (MWDCs) is considered one of the ways to reduce the environmental and public risk of medical waste pollution. However, how to serve the medical waste disposal demand in optimal MWDCs’ locations is a key challenge due to the complexity of the whole system and relationships among stakeholders. This article develops a soft‐path solution for reducing risks as well as mitigating the related costs by optimizing the MWDC location‐allocation problem. A risk mitigation‐oriented bilevel equilibrium optimization model is developed for modeling the Stackelberg game behavior between the local government and the medical institutions. The objectives of the local government are minimizing the total risk of loss, the subsidy costs, and the investment cost of building the MWDCs, while minimizing the disposal and transportation costs are the objectives at the medical institution level. Fuzzy random variables are introduced by combining insufficient historical data with expert knowledge via consulting surveys to describe the coexisting uncertainties in the data. To solve the model, a hybrid approach combined with the interactive fuzzy programming technique and an Entropy‐Boltzmann selection‐based genetic algorithm are designed and tested. The Chengdu Medical Waste Disposal Centers Planning Project is used as a practical application. The results show that it is possible to achieve a balanced market with higher economic efficiency and significantly reduced risk through an appropriate principle of interactive actions between the bilevel stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Liming Yao & Zhongwen Xu & Ziqiang Zeng, 2020. "A Soft‐Path Solution to Risk Reduction by Modeling Medical Waste Disposal Center Location‐Allocation Optimization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1863-1886, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:9:p:1863-1886
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.13509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13509
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.13509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lina Mallozzi & Antonia Passarelli di Napoli, 2017. "Optimal transport and a bilevel location-allocation problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 207-221, January.
    2. Ting Zeng & James Ward, 2005. "The Stochastic Location-Assignment Problem on a Tree," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 81-97, April.
    3. Mohanta, Dusmanta Kumar & Sadhu, Pradip Kumar & Chakrabarti, R., 2007. "Deterministic and stochastic approach for safety and reliability optimization of captive power plant maintenance scheduling using GA/SA-based hybrid techniques: A comparison of results," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 187-199.
    4. Shishebori, Davood & Yousefi Babadi, Abolghasem, 2015. "Robust and reliable medical services network design under uncertain environment and system disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 268-288.
    5. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    6. Mogale, D.G. & Kumar, Mukesh & Kumar, Sri Krishna & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2018. "Grain silo location-allocation problem with dwell time for optimization of food grain supply chain network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 40-69.
    7. J. W. Gavett & Norman V. Plyter, 1966. "The Optimal Assignment of Facilities to Locations by Branch and Bound," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 210-232, April.
    8. Arora, S.R. & Gupta, Ritu, 2009. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for bilevel programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 368-376, April.
    9. Shamekhi Amiri, A. & Torabi, S. Ali & Ghodsi, R., 2018. "An iterative approach for a bi-level competitive supply chain network design problem under foresight competition and variable coverage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 99-114.
    10. Küçükaydin, Hande & Aras, Necati & Kuban AltInel, I., 2011. "Competitive facility location problem with attractiveness adjustment of the follower: A bilevel programming model and its solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 206-220, February.
    11. Wen, Meilin & Iwamura, Kakuzo, 2008. "Fuzzy facility location-allocation problem under the Hurwicz criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 627-635, January.
    12. Victor DeMiguel & Huifu Xu, 2009. "A Stochastic Multiple-Leader Stackelberg Model: Analysis, Computation, and Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1220-1235, October.
    13. André Pereira & Bernardo Andrade, 2015. "On the genetic algorithm with adaptive mutation rate and selected statistical applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 131-150, March.
    14. Basheer M. Khumawala, 1972. "An Efficient Branch and Bound Algorithm for the Warehouse Location Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(12), pages 718-731, August.
    15. Samanlioglu, Funda, 2013. "A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 332-340.
    16. Vedat Verter, 2011. "Uncapacitated and Capacitated Facility Location Problems," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: H. A. Eiselt & Vladimir Marianov (ed.), Foundations of Location Analysis, chapter 0, pages 25-37, Springer.
    17. Wichapa, Narong & Khokhajaikiat, Porntep, 2017. "Solving multi-objective facility location problem using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and goal programming: a case study on infectious waste disposal centers," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 39-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gholami-Zanjani, Seyed Mohammad & Klibi, Walid & Jabalameli, Mohammad Saeed & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2021. "The design of resilient food supply chain networks prone to epidemic disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    3. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    4. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    6. Usher, Dan, 2001. "Personal goods, efficiency and the law," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 673-703, November.
    7. George Tridimas & Stanley L. Winer, 2018. "On the Definition and Nature of Fiscal Coercion," Carleton Economic Papers 18-09, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    8. Mario Jametti & Thomas von Ungern-Sternberg, 2005. "Assessing the Efficiency of an Insurance Provider—A Measurement Error Approach," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 30(1), pages 15-34, June.
    9. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    10. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    11. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Valcu-Lisman, Adriana & Weninger, Quinn, 2012. "Markov-Perfect rent dissipation in rights-based fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 201209260700001037, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Hausknost, Daniel & Grima, Nelson & Singh, Simron Jit, 2017. "The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 109-118.
    14. Kurtis Swope & Ryan Wielgus & Pamela Schmitt & John Cadigan, 2011. "Contracts, Behavior, and the Land-assembly Problem: An Experimental Study," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments on Energy, the Environment, and Sustainability, pages 151-180, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    15. Ralph E. Townsend, 2010. "Transactions costs as an obstacle to fisheries self-governance in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 301-320, July.
    16. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    17. Whitten, Stuart M. & Salzman, James & Shelton, Dave & Procter, Wendy, 2003. "Markets for ecosystem services: Applying the concepts," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 58269, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    19. Karsten Neuhoff, 2002. "Optimal congestion treatment for bilateral electricity trading," Working Papers EP05, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    20. Maximiliano Marzetti & Rok Spruk, 2023. "Long-Term Economic Effects of Populist Legal Reforms: Evidence from Argentina," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 60-95, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:9:p:1863-1886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.