IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v208y2011i3p206-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive facility location problem with attractiveness adjustment of the follower: A bilevel programming model and its solution

Author

Listed:
  • Küçükaydin, Hande
  • Aras, Necati
  • Kuban AltInel, I.

Abstract

We are concerned with a problem in which a firm or franchise enters a market by locating new facilities where there are existing facilities belonging to a competitor. The firm aims at finding the location and attractiveness of each facility to be opened so as to maximize its profit. The competitor, on the other hand, can react by adjusting the attractiveness of its existing facilities with the objective of maximizing its own profit. The demand is assumed to be aggregated at certain points in the plane and the facilities of the firm can be located at predetermined candidate sites. We employ Huff's gravity-based rule in modeling the behavior of the customers where the fraction of customers at a demand point that visit a certain facility is proportional to the facility attractiveness and inversely proportional to the distance between the facility site and demand point. We formulate a bilevel mixed-integer nonlinear programming model where the firm entering the market is the leader and the competitor is the follower. In order to find the optimal solution of this model, we convert it into an equivalent one-level mixed-integer nonlinear program so that it can be solved by global optimization methods. Apart from reporting computational results obtained on a set of randomly generated instances, we also compute the benefit the leader firm derives from anticipating the competitor's reaction of adjusting the attractiveness levels of its facilities. The results on the test instances indicate that the benefit is 58.33% on the average.

Suggested Citation

  • Küçükaydin, Hande & Aras, Necati & Kuban AltInel, I., 2011. "Competitive facility location problem with attractiveness adjustment of the follower: A bilevel programming model and its solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 206-220, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:208:y:2011:i:3:p:206-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00546-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lederer, Phillip J & Hurter, Arthur P, Jr, 1986. "Competition of Firms: Discriminatory Pricing and Location," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(3), pages 623-640, May.
    2. David L. Huff, 1966. "A Programmed Solution for Approximating an Optimum Retail Location," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 42(3), pages 293-303.
    3. Zeynep Gümüş & Christodoulos Floudas, 2005. "Global optimization of mixed-integer bilevel programming problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 181-212, July.
    4. José Fernández & Blas Pelegrín & Frank Plastria & Boglárka Tóth, 2007. "Planar Location and Design of a New Facility with Inner and Outer Competition: An Interval Lexicographical-like Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 19-44, March.
    5. Drezner, Tammy & Drezner, Zvi & Salhi, Said, 2002. "Solving the multiple competitive facilities location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 138-151, October.
    6. Jan, Rong-Hong & Chern, Maw-Sheng, 1994. "Nonlinear integer bilevel programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 574-587, February.
    7. Aras, Necati & Aksen, Deniz & Gönül Tanugur, Ayse, 2008. "Locating collection centers for incentive-dependent returns under a pick-up policy with capacitated vehicles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1223-1240, December.
    8. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    9. Wendell, R. E. & McKelvey, R. D., 1981. "New perspectives in competitive location theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 174-182, February.
    10. Oded Berman & Dmitry Krass, 2002. "Locating Multiple Competitive Facilities: Spatial Interaction Models with Variable Expenditures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 197-225, March.
    11. Martine Labbé & S. Louis Hakimi, 1991. "Market and Locational Equilibrium for Two Competitors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 749-756, October.
    12. Daniel Serra & Charles Revelle, 1997. "Competitive location and pricing on networks," Economics Working Papers 219, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    13. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2004. "Finding the optimal solution to the Huff based competitive location model," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 193-208, July.
    14. Drezner, Zvi, 1982. "Competitive location strategies for two facilities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 485-493, November.
    15. Aboolian, Robert & Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry, 2007. "Competitive facility location model with concave demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 598-619, September.
    16. Rhim, Hosun & Ho, Teck H. & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2003. "Competitive location, production, and market selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 211-228, August.
    17. Daniel Serra & Charles Revelle, 1993. "Market capture by two competitors: The pre-emptive location problem," Economics Working Papers 39, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    18. Kathrin Fischer, 2002. "Sequential Discrete p-Facility Models for Competitive Location Planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 253-270, March.
    19. Benati, Stefano & Hansen, Pierre, 2002. "The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 518-530, December.
    20. T Drezner & Z Drezner, 2008. "Lost demand in a competitive environment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 362-371, March.
    21. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2002. "Validating the Gravity-Based Competitive Location Model Using Inferred Attractiveness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 227-237, March.
    22. LEDERER, Philip J. & THISSE, Jacques-François, 1990. "Competitive location on networks under delivered pricing," LIDAM Reprints CORE 893, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    23. Aboolian, Robert & Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry, 2007. "Competitive facility location and design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 40-62, October.
    24. James T. Moore & Jonathan F. Bard, 1990. "The Mixed Integer Linear Bilevel Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 911-921, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drezner, Zvi & Eiselt, H.A., 2024. "Competitive location models: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 5-18.
    2. Jayaswal, Sachin & Sinha, Ankur, 2022. "Bilevel Optimization: Applications, Models and Solution Approaches," IIMA Working Papers WP 2022-05-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    3. Lin, Yun Hui & Tian, Qingyun, 2021. "Branch-and-cut approach based on generalized benders decomposition for facility location with limited choice rule," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 109-119.
    4. Fu, Chenyi & Ma, Shoufeng & Zhu, Ning & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2022. "Bike-sharing inventory management for market expansion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 28-54.
    5. Eligius M. T. Hendrix, 2016. "On competition in a Stackelberg location-design model with deterministic supplier choice," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 19-30, November.
    6. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Liao, Wei-Hung, 2018. "An approximation algorithm for a competitive facility location problem with network effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 176-186.
    7. Fernández, José & Hendrix, Eligius M.T., 2013. "Recent insights in Huff-like competitive facility location and design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 581-584.
    8. Ekaterina Alekseeva & Yury Kochetov & Alexandr Plyasunov, 2015. "An exact method for the discrete $$(r|p)$$ ( r | p ) -centroid problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 445-460, November.
    9. Shamekhi Amiri, A. & Torabi, S. Ali & Ghodsi, R., 2018. "An iterative approach for a bi-level competitive supply chain network design problem under foresight competition and variable coverage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 99-114.
    10. Yun Hui Lin & Qingyun Tian & Yanlu Zhao, 2022. "Locating facilities under competition and market expansion: Formulation, optimization, and implications," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 3021-3042, July.
    11. Song, Xiaoling & Xu, Jiuping & Zhang, Zhe & Shen, Charles & Xie, Heping & Peña-Mora, Feniosky & Wu, Yimin, 2017. "Reconciling strategy towards construction site selection-layout for coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 846-865.
    12. Boglárka G.-Tóth & Kristóf Kovács, 2016. "Solving a Huff-like Stackelberg location problem on networks," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 233-247, February.
    13. Escudero, Laureano F. & Monge, Juan F. & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2020. "On pricing-based equilibrium for network expansion planning. A multi-period bilevel approach under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 262-279.
    14. Sinha, Ankur & Malo, Pekka & Deb, Kalyanmoy, 2017. "Evolutionary algorithm for bilevel optimization using approximations of the lower level optimal solution mapping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 395-411.
    15. Vladimir Marianov & H. A. Eiselt, 2016. "On agglomeration in competitive location models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 31-55, November.
    16. Liu, Shaonan & Kong, Nan & Parikh, Pratik & Wang, Mingzheng, 2023. "Optimal trauma care network redesign with government subsidy: A bilevel integer programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Liming Yao & Zhongwen Xu & Ziqiang Zeng, 2020. "A Soft‐Path Solution to Risk Reduction by Modeling Medical Waste Disposal Center Location‐Allocation Optimization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1863-1886, September.
    18. Teodora Dan & Patrice Marcotte, 2019. "Competitive Facility Location with Selfish Users and Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 479-497, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drezner, Zvi & Eiselt, H.A., 2024. "Competitive location models: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 5-18.
    2. H Küçükaydın & N Aras & İ K Altınel, 2011. "A discrete competitive facility location model with variable attractiveness," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1726-1741, September.
    3. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Atsuo Suzuki, 2019. "A cover based competitive facility location model with continuous demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 565-581, October.
    4. Diego Ruiz-Hernández & Javier Elizalde & David Delgado-Gómez, 2017. "Cournot–Stackelberg games in competitive delocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 149-170, September.
    5. Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Dullaert, Wout & De Borger, Bruno, 2014. "Designing a new supply chain for competition against an existing supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 124-140.
    6. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    7. S Rezapour & R Zanjirani Farahani & T Drezner, 2011. "Strategic design of competing supply chain networks for inelastic demand," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1784-1795, October.
    8. Pelegrín, Blas & Fernández, Pascual & Dolores García Pérez, María & Cano Hernández, Saúl, 2012. "On the location of new facilities for chain expansion under delivered pricing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 149-158, April.
    9. Zhang, Yue, 2015. "Designing a retail store network with strategic pricing in a competitive environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 265-273.
    10. Asgari, Nasrin & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Goh, Mark, 2013. "Network design approach for hub ports-shipping companies competition and cooperation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-18.
    11. T Drezner & Z Drezner & P Kalczynski, 2011. "A cover-based competitive location model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 100-113, January.
    12. Gohram Baloch & Fatma Gzara, 2020. "Strategic Network Design for Parcel Delivery with Drones Under Competition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 204-228, January.
    13. Xiang Li & Tianyu Zhang & Liang Wang & Hongguang Ma & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "A minimax regret model for the leader–follower facility location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 861-882, February.
    14. Zvi Drezner & Dawit Zerom, 2024. "A refinement of the gravity model for competitive facility location," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Dawit Zerom, 2020. "Facility Dependent Distance Decay in Competitive Location," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 915-934, December.
    16. Zvi Drezner & Dawit Zerom, 2023. "Competitive facility location under attrition," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Abdullah Dasci & Gilbert Laporte, 2005. "A Continuous Model for Multistore Competitive Location," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 263-280, April.
    18. Fernandez, Pascual & Pelegrin, Blas & Garcia Perez, Maria Dolores & Peeters, Peter H., 2007. "A discrete long-term location-price problem under the assumption of discriminatory pricing: Formulations and parametric analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1050-1062, June.
    19. Tammy Drezner & Morton O’Kelly & Zvi Drezner, 2023. "Multipurpose shopping trips and location," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 191-208, February.
    20. Lin, Yun Hui & Tian, Qingyun, 2021. "Branch-and-cut approach based on generalized benders decomposition for facility location with limited choice rule," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 109-119.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:208:y:2011:i:3:p:206-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.