IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v60y2013i2p87-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formulations for dynamic lot sizing with service levels

Author

Listed:
  • Dinakar Gade
  • Simge Küçükyavuz

Abstract

In this article, we study deterministic dynamic lot‐sizing problems with a service‐level constraint on the total number of periods in which backlogs can occur over a finite planning horizon. We give a natural mixed integer programming formulation for the single item problem (LS‐SL‐I) and study the structure of its solution. We show that an optimal solution to this problem can be found in \documentclass{article}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}\begin{align*}\mathcal O(n^2\kappa)\end{align*} \end{document} time, where n is the planning horizon and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}\begin{align*}\kappa=\mathcal O(n)\end{align*} \end{document} is the maximum number of periods in which demand can be backlogged. Using the proposed shortest path algorithms, we develop alternative tight extended formulations for LS‐SL‐I and one of its relaxations, which we refer to as uncapacitated lot sizing with setups for stocks and backlogs. {We show that this relaxation also appears as a substructure in a lot‐sizing problem which limits the total amount of a period's demand met from a later period, across all periods.} We report computational results that compare the natural and extended formulations on multi‐item service‐level constrained instances. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Dinakar Gade & Simge Küçükyavuz, 2013. "Formulations for dynamic lot sizing with service levels," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 87-101, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:60:y:2013:i:2:p:87-101
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barany, I. & Edmonds , J. & Wolsey, L.A., 1986. "Packing and covering a tree by subtrees," LIDAM Reprints CORE 728, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    3. Rardin, Ronald L. & Wolsey, Laurence A., 1993. "Valid inequalities and projecting the multicommodity extended formulation for uncapacitated fixed charge network flow problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 95-109, November.
    4. Tempelmeier, Horst, 2011. "A column generation heuristic for dynamic capacitated lot sizing with random demand under a fill rate constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 627-633, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartmut Stadtler & Malte Meistering, 2019. "Model formulations for the capacitated lot-sizing problem with service-level constraints," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 1025-1056, December.
    2. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    3. Sereshti, Narges & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Jans, Raf, 2021. "The value of aggregate service levels in stochastic lot sizing problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Max Bucher & Alexandra Schwartz, 2018. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions and Improved Convergence Results for Regularization Methods for Cardinality-Constrained Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 383-410, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Céline Gicquel & Jianqiang Cheng, 2018. "A joint chance-constrained programming approach for the single-item capacitated lot-sizing problem with stochastic demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 123-155, May.
    2. Laurence A. Wolsey, 2002. "Solving Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems with an MIP Solver Using Classification and Reformulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1587-1602, December.
    3. Kerem Akartunalı & Ioannis Fragkos & Andrew J. Miller & Tao Wu, 2016. "Local Cuts and Two-Period Convex Hull Closures for Big-Bucket Lot-Sizing Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 766-780, November.
    4. Kerem Akartunalı & Andrew Miller, 2012. "A computational analysis of lower bounds for big bucket production planning problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 729-753, December.
    5. Ming Zhao & Minjiao Zhang, 2020. "Multiechelon Lot Sizing: New Complexities and Inequalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 534-551, March.
    6. Cunha, Jesus O. & Melo, Rafael A., 2021. "Valid inequalities, preprocessing, and an effective heuristic for the uncapacitated three-level lot-sizing and replenishment problem with a distribution structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 874-892.
    7. AkartunalI, Kerem & Miller, Andrew J., 2009. "A heuristic approach for big bucket multi-level production planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 396-411, March.
    8. Brahimi, Nadjib & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Nordli, Atle, 2017. "Single-item dynamic lot-sizing problems: An updated survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 838-863.
    9. Rossi, Roberto & Kilic, Onur A. & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2015. "Piecewise linear approximations for the static–dynamic uncertainty strategy in stochastic lot-sizing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 126-140.
    10. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Hande Yaman, 2012. "A Polyhedral Study of Multiechelon Lot Sizing with Intermediate Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 918-935, August.
    11. Wei, Mingyuan & Qi, Mingyao & Wu, Tao & Zhang, Canrong, 2019. "Distance and matching-induced search algorithm for the multi-level lot-sizing problem with substitutable bill of materials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 521-541.
    12. Koca, Esra & Yaman, Hande & Selim Aktürk, M., 2015. "Stochastic lot sizing problem with controllable processing times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Joseph Geunes & H. Edwin Romeijn & Kevin Taaffe, 2006. "Requirements Planning with Pricing and Order Selection Flexibility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 394-401, April.
    14. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    15. Wolosewicz, Cathy & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Aggoune, Riad, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic for an integrated lot-sizing and fixed scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 3-12.
    16. Charles, Mehdi & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia & Mazhoud, Issam, 2022. "Motivations and analysis of the capacitated lot-sizing problem with setup times and minimum and maximum ending inventories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 203-220.
    17. Sereshti, Narges & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Jans, Raf, 2024. "Managing flexibility in stochastic multi-level lot sizing problem with service level constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    18. Liu, Tieming, 2008. "Economic lot sizing problem with inventory bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 204-215, February.
    19. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2009. "Coordination of pricing and inventory control across products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 175-190, March.
    20. Chakrabarti, T. & Chaudhuri, K. S., 1997. "An EOQ model for deteriorating items with a linear trend in demand and shortages in all cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 205-213, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:60:y:2013:i:2:p:87-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.