IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v295y2021i3p874-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valid inequalities, preprocessing, and an effective heuristic for the uncapacitated three-level lot-sizing and replenishment problem with a distribution structure

Author

Listed:
  • Cunha, Jesus O.
  • Melo, Rafael A.

Abstract

We consider the uncapacitated three-level lot-sizing and replenishment problem with a distribution structure. In this problem, a single production plant sends the produced items to replenish warehouses from where they are dispatched to the retailers in order to satisfy their demands over a finite planning horizon. Transfers between warehouses or retailers are not permitted, each retailer has a single predefined warehouse from which it receives its items, and there is no restriction on the amount that can be produced or transported in a given period. The goal of the problem is to determine an integrated production and distribution plan minimizing the total costs, which comprehends fixed production and transportation setup as well as variable inventory holding costs. We describe new valid inequalities both in the space of a standard mixed integer programming (MIP) formulation and in that of a new alternative extended MIP formulation. We show that using such extended formulation, valid inequalities having similar structures to those in the standard one allow achieving tighter linear relaxation bounds. Furthermore, we propose a preprocessing approach to reduce the size of an extended multi-commodity MIP formulation available in the literature. Such preprocessing relies on the removal of variables based on the problem’s cost structure while preserving optimality guarantees. We also propose a multi-start randomized bottom-up dynamic programming-based heuristic. The heuristic employs greedy randomization via changes in certain costs and solves subproblems related to each level using dynamic programming. Computational experiments indicate that the use of the valid inequalities in a branch-and-cut approach significantly increase the ability of a MIP solver to solve instances to optimality. Additionally, the valid inequalities for the new alternative extended formulation outperform those for the standard one in terms of number of solved instances, running time and number of enumerated nodes. Moreover, the proposed heuristic is able to generate solutions with considerably low optimality gaps within very short computational times even for large instances. Combining the preprocessing approach with the heuristic, one can achieve an increase in the number of solutions solved to optimality within the time limit together with significant reductions on the average times for solving them.

Suggested Citation

  • Cunha, Jesus O. & Melo, Rafael A., 2021. "Valid inequalities, preprocessing, and an effective heuristic for the uncapacitated three-level lot-sizing and replenishment problem with a distribution structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 874-892.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:295:y:2021:i:3:p:874-892
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721002551
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesus Cunha & Rafael Melo, 2016. "On reformulations for the one-warehouse multi-retailer problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 99-122, March.
    2. Helber, Stefan & Sahling, Florian, 2010. "A fix-and-optimize approach for the multi-level capacitated lot sizing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 247-256, February.
    3. Albert Wagelmans & Stan van Hoesel & Antoon Kolen, 1992. "Economic Lot Sizing: An O(n log n) Algorithm That Runs in Linear Time in the Wagner-Whitin Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1-supplem), pages 145-156, February.
    4. Dellaert, N. P. & Jeunet, J., 2003. "Randomized multi-level lot-sizing heuristics for general product structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 211-228, July.
    5. VAN VYVE, Matthieu & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2006. "Approximate extended formulations," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1807, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. BARANY, Imre & VAN ROY, Tony & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1984. "Uncapacitated lot-sizing: the convex hull of solutions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 605, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Yves Pochet & Laurence A. Wolsey, 1991. "Solving Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems Using Strong Cutting Planes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 53-67, January.
    8. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    9. Simin Zhang & Haiqing Song, 2018. "Production and Distribution Planning in Danone Waters China Division," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 578-590, November.
    10. Rardin, Ronald L. & Wolsey, Laurence A., 1993. "Valid inequalities and projecting the multicommodity extended formulation for uncapacitated fixed charge network flow problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 95-109, November.
    11. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Hande Yaman, 2012. "A Polyhedral Study of Multiechelon Lot Sizing with Intermediate Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 918-935, August.
    12. Jesus O. Cunha & Rafael A. Melo, 2016. "On reformulations for the one-warehouse multi-retailer problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 99-122, March.
    13. MELO, Rafael A. & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2010. "Uncapacitated two-level lot-sizing," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2235, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    14. Li, Jianxiang & Chu, Feng & Chen, Haoxun, 2011. "A solution approach to the inventory routing problem in a three-level distribution system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 736-744, May.
    15. MELO, Rafael A. & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2012. "MIP formulations and heuristics for two-level production-transportation problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2506, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. Kerem Akartunalı & Andrew Miller, 2012. "A computational analysis of lower bounds for big bucket production planning problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 729-753, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerem Akartunalı & Ioannis Fragkos & Andrew J. Miller & Tao Wu, 2016. "Local Cuts and Two-Period Convex Hull Closures for Big-Bucket Lot-Sizing Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 766-780, November.
    2. Wei, Mingyuan & Qi, Mingyao & Wu, Tao & Zhang, Canrong, 2019. "Distance and matching-induced search algorithm for the multi-level lot-sizing problem with substitutable bill of materials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 521-541.
    3. Ming Zhao & Minjiao Zhang, 2020. "Multiechelon Lot Sizing: New Complexities and Inequalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 534-551, March.
    4. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Hande Yaman, 2012. "A Polyhedral Study of Multiechelon Lot Sizing with Intermediate Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 918-935, August.
    5. Goisque, Guillaume & Rapine, Christophe, 2017. "An efficient algorithm for the 2-level capacitated lot-sizing problem with identical capacities at both levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 918-928.
    6. Laurence A. Wolsey, 2002. "Solving Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems with an MIP Solver Using Classification and Reformulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1587-1602, December.
    7. Chen, Haoxun, 2015. "Fix-and-optimize and variable neighborhood search approaches for multi-level capacitated lot sizing problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 25-36.
    8. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    9. Kerem Akartunalı & Andrew Miller, 2012. "A computational analysis of lower bounds for big bucket production planning problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 729-753, December.
    10. Siao-Leu Phouratsamay & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Fanny Pascual, 2021. "Coordination of a two-level supply chain with contracts," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 235-264, June.
    11. AkartunalI, Kerem & Miller, Andrew J., 2009. "A heuristic approach for big bucket multi-level production planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 396-411, March.
    12. Brahimi, Nadjib & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Nordli, Atle, 2017. "Single-item dynamic lot-sizing problems: An updated survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 838-863.
    13. Ioannis Fragkos & Zeger Degraeve & Bert De Reyck, 2016. "A Horizon Decomposition Approach for the Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problem with Setup Times," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 465-482, August.
    14. Jesus O. Cunha & Rafael A. Melo, 2016. "On reformulations for the one-warehouse multi-retailer problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 99-122, March.
    15. Wolsey, Laurence A., 1995. "Progress with single-item lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 395-401, November.
    16. Alper Atamtürk & Simge Küçükyavuz, 2005. "Lot Sizing with Inventory Bounds and Fixed Costs: Polyhedral Study and Computation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 711-730, August.
    17. VAN VYVE, Mathieu & WOLSEY, Laurence & YAMAN, Hande, 2012. "Relaxations for two-level multi-item lot-sizing problem," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2012031, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    18. Jesus Cunha & Rafael Melo, 2016. "On reformulations for the one-warehouse multi-retailer problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 99-122, March.
    19. Atamturk, Alper & Munoz, Juan Carlos, 2002. "A Study of the Lot-Sizing Polytope," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6zz2g0z4, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Hadi Farhangi, 2021. "Multi-Echelon Supply Chains with Lead Times and Uncertain Demands," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:295:y:2021:i:3:p:874-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.