IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i2p2158244019853904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Needs for Bipolar Disorder From Clinicians’ Perspectives: Narrowing the Research–Practice Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Eva F. Maassen
  • Eline J. Regeer
  • Joske F.G. Bunders
  • Ralph W. Kupka
  • Barbara J. Regeer

Abstract

Research evidence is incompletely translated into clinical practice. This study aimed to explore research needs from clinicians’ perspectives in the field of bipolar disorder and their reflections on patients’ research needs as well as to unravel the potential role of researcher-clinicians, to narrow the research practice gap. Using focus group discussions (FGDs) and interviews, research needs according to psychiatrists, psychologists, and nurses working with bipolar disorder were explored. Subsequently, we interviewed researcher-clinicians to gain insights into their views on patients’ research needs. The clinicians’ research needs were clustered as: causes, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, nonpharmacological treatment, recovery, and care system, and overlapped with the research needs formulated by patients. Researcher-clinicians were able to translate patients’ needs into feasible research questions. Researcher-clinicians can serve as intermediaries between research and practice and can both integrate their practical experience into research and their research experience into practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva F. Maassen & Eline J. Regeer & Joske F.G. Bunders & Ralph W. Kupka & Barbara J. Regeer, 2019. "Research Needs for Bipolar Disorder From Clinicians’ Perspectives: Narrowing the Research–Practice Gap," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019853904
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019853904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019853904
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019853904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catharina J. van Oostveen & Nicole S. Goedhart & Anneke L. Francke & Hester Vermeulen, 2017. "Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospita," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4973-4984, December.
    2. Michelle Cleary & Glenn E Hunt & Garry Walter & Debra Jackson, 2010. "Fostering real‐world clinical mental health research," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3453-3458, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia van Kraaij & Catharina van Oostveen & Hester Vermeulen & Maud Heinen & Anita Huis & Marian Adriaansen & Jeroen Peters, 2020. "Nurse practitioners’ perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 447-458, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019853904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.