IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i3-4p546-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fatigue and quality of life in women treated for various types of gynaecological cancers: a cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse
  • Karl Ove Hufthammer
  • Margrethe Elin Vika

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the prevalence of cancer‐related fatigue in women treated for various types of gynaecological cancers and, for these cancers, to assess fatigue in relation to distress, health‐related quality of life, demography and treatment characteristics. Background Advances in treatment of cancer have improved the likelihood of survival. Consequently, there are a growing number of patients who become survivors after cancer and who face side effects even years after treatment. One of the most frequently reported side effects across all types and stages of the disease is cancer‐related fatigue. Design A descriptive cross‐sectional study. Methods One hundred and twenty women treated for gynaecological cancers who were participants in an intervention study were included. Fatigue, psychological distress, health‐related QoL and demographics were assessed by questionnaires. Disease and treatment characteristics were extracted from medical records. Results Cancer‐related fatigue was reported in 53% of the women treated for gynaecological cancers, with a higher proportion in the group of cervical cancer, followed by ovarian cancer. Younger participants reported fatigue more frequently than older participants. When adjusting for age, the type of cancer a woman experiences was shown to have little impact on her risk of experiencing fatigue. The participants with fatigue reported higher levels of anxiety and depression than participants without fatigue. There was a relationship between fatigue and quality of life as measured by SF‐36 domains. Conclusion The findings underscore the importance of screening for fatigue, patient education and symptom management. This should be included in a standard procedure during treatment and follow‐up. Both somatic and psychological aspects of fatigue should be emphasised. Relevance to clinical practice The findings imply the need for health personnel to have focus on fatigue during the entire cancer trajectory of women after gynaecological cancers, as well as the need for screening, information, guidance and symptom management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Karl Ove Hufthammer & Margrethe Elin Vika, 2015. "Fatigue and quality of life in women treated for various types of gynaecological cancers: a cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 546-555, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:546-555
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12647
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tjur, Tue, 2009. "Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(4), pages 366-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Kobleder & Hanna Mayer & Larissa Gehrig & Beate Senn, 2017. "“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4890-4898, December.
    2. Chia‐Hui Yu & Tsae‐Jyy Wang & Chih‐Long Chang & Shu‐Yuan Liang & Shu‐Fang Wu & Chieh‐Yu Liu & Yu Ying Lu, 2020. "Healthy life styles, sleep and fatigue in endometrial cancer survivors: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1372-1380, April.
    3. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Gail Dunberger & Mette Linnet Olesen & Maria Østerbye & Lene Seibæk, 2019. "Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer—An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1393-1421, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingo Geishecker & Philipp J. H. Schröder & Allan S⊘rensen, 2019. "One‐off export events," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 93-131, February.
    2. Daifeng Xiang & Gangsheng Wang & Jing Tian & Wanyu Li, 2023. "Global patterns and edaphic-climatic controls of soil carbon decomposition kinetics predicted from incubation experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Laurion, Henry, 2020. "Implications of Non-GAAP earnings for real activities and accounting choices," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    4. Laura H. Antão & Benjamin Weigel & Giovanni Strona & Maria Hällfors & Elina Kaarlejärvi & Tad Dallas & Øystein H. Opedal & Janne Heliölä & Heikki Henttonen & Otso Huitu & Erkki Korpimäki & Mikko Kuuss, 2022. "Climate change reshuffles northern species within their niches," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(6), pages 587-592, June.
    5. Franziska Disslbacher & Julia Hofmann, 2021. "Einstellungen zum Wohlfahrtsstaat und dessen Finanzierung in Österreich," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 47(3), pages 329-360.
    6. Mikkel Kruuse & Kasper Reming Tangbæk & Kristjan Jespersen & Caleb Gallemore, 2019. "Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Chavez, Daniel & Palma, Marco & Collart, Alba J., 2016. "Eye Tracking to Model Attribute Attendance," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230011, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. David M. Goldberg & Nohel Zaman & Arin Brahma & Mariano Aloiso, 2022. "Are mortgage loan closing delay risks predictable? A predictive analysis using text mining on discussion threads," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 419-437, March.
    9. Huang, Francis L. & Cornell, Dewey, 2018. "The relationship of school climate with out-of-school suspensions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 378-389.
    10. Jukka Heinonen & Michał Czepkiewicz & Áróra Árnadóttir & Juudit Ottelin, 2021. "Drivers of Car Ownership in a Car-Oriented City: A Mixed-Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Johan Karlsson, 2021. "Firm size and growth barriers: a data-driven approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1319-1338, October.
    12. Finch, W. Holmes & Hernàndez Finch, Maria E. & Avery, Brooke, 2023. "Teacher support of non-native language students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-national comparison," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Haider, Saira M. & Benscoter, Allison M. & Pearlstine, Leonard & D'Acunto, Laura E. & Romañach, Stephanie S., 2021. "Landscape-scale drivers of endangered Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow (Ammospiza maritima mirabilis) presence using an ensemble modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 461(C).
    14. Tomáš Krejčí & Josef Navrátil & Stanislav Martinát & Ryan J. Frazier & Petr Klusáček & Kamil Pícha & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2021. "Spatial Unevenness of Formation, Remediation and Persistence of Post-Agricultural Brownfields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Kassas, Bachir & Palma, Marco A. & Zhang, Yvette, 2016. "The role of incentives on preference revelations in auctions versus rankings," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 73-85.
    16. Constantin, Andreea & Peltonen, Tuomas A. & Sarlin, Peter, 2018. "Network linkages to predict bank distress," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 226-241.
    17. Cheng, C.-L. & Shalabh, & Garg, G., 2014. "Coefficient of determination for multiple measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 137-152.
    18. Anaya-Boig, Esther & Douch, Jenny & Castro, Alberto, 2021. "The death and life of bike-sharing schemes in Spain: 2003–2018," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 227-236.
    19. Alexia Gaudeul, 2013. "Social preferences under uncertainty," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-024, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    20. Yosuke Tanigawa & Junyang Qian & Guhan Venkataraman & Johanne Marie Justesen & Ruilin Li & Robert Tibshirani & Trevor Hastie & Manuel A Rivas, 2022. "Significant sparse polygenic risk scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:546-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.